Fortuyn killed 'to protect Muslims'

[timosman]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...t-Muslims.html

28 Mar 2003

A Left-wing activist confessed in court yesterday to Holland's first political assassination in 400 years, claiming that he shot Pim Fortuyn to defend Dutch Muslims from persecution.
Volkert van der Graaf, 33, a vegan animal rights campaigner, said he alone was responsible for killing the maverick protest leader last May, days before a general election in which the Fortuyn List party vaulted into second place and shattered Holland's consensus.
Facing a raucous court on the first day of his murder trial, he said his goal was to stop Mr Fortuyn exploiting Muslims as "scapegoats" and targeting "the weak parts of society to score points" to try to gain political power.
He said: "I confess to the shooting. He was an ever growing danger who would affect many people in society. I saw it as a danger. I hoped that I could solve it myself."
Mr Fortuyn's relatives wore fur coats in the high-security court to show scorn for the animal rights zealot. "I want to cause him maximum pain, I will make sure he notices me," said Jolanda Fortuyn, a sister-in-law who helped edit many of Mr Fortuyn's inflammatory books and columns.

Onlookers in the gallery shouted abuse through a glass screen, with a vehemence unusual for the Dutch. "Life! Life," chanted Fortuyn supporters, some of whom were jostled from the room by bailiffs.
Van der Graaf, who avoided eye contact with the family, could be jailed for 20 years. Holland does not practice the death penalty.
He confessed to the crime last November, after months of silence, but had never explained publicly why he reacted so violently against his victim, a gay former Marxist professor who mixed Left-wing and Right-wing ideas.
The shaven-headed Fortuyn, who used to sweep across Rotterdam in a chauffeur-driven Daimler with two King Charles spaniels by his side, relished mocking all forms of political correctness, but rarely ventured into the animal rights dispute.
His chief targets were militant Islam and the persecution of gays and lesbians. He said the emergence in Rotterdam, Amsterdam and The Hague of Muslim ghettoes resisting assimilation threatened Holland's liberal society and national cohesion.
His murder stunned the nation. Thousands queued outside the Rotterdam Stadhuis to sign a condolence book.
Mr Fortuyn's party survived 100 days in office before its coalition partners called a fresh election in January. The established parties co-opted much of Mr Fortuyn's law-and-order message, reducing his party to eight MPs.
The trial is expected to last three days, with a verdict next month. The panel of judges must decide whether Van der Graaf is mentally fit to be held accountable for the crime.

[Firestarter]

Pim Fortuyn was murderd on May 6, 2002 – not to protect Islam – but to protect the monarchy and the JSF project (Lockheed was already bribing Bilderberg cofounder Prince Bernhard in the 1960s).

First some information on Fortuyn.
Fortuyn was trying for many years - without success - to get a place in the major political parties PvdA or VVD, when he got a large following because of his articles in Elsevier (criticising Dutch politics). In November 2001 he became the election leader for Leefbaar Nederland, and after some controversial comments in February 2002, Leefbaar Nederland made him resign and then he started his own Lijst Pim Fortuyn (LPF). Fortuyn became immensely popular in a short amount of time. Fortuyn was still the election leader for Leefbaar Nederland for local elections and got 37.8% of the seats for the city of Rotterdam.
He made anti-Islam comments and he even wanted to stop immigrants coming to the Netherlands. I don’t think Fortuyn was the total racist he was made out to be: he wanted to give illegal immigrants already in the Netherlands a legal status. At first the media tried to ignore him, but when this didn’t stop his meteoric rise in popularity, they demonised him for being an extreme right racist.
Fortuyn was very good in dominating election debates; he made other politicians look like mumbling fools. Fortuyn wanted to drastically cut the money for the government. He was violently opposed to the billions for the JSF fighting aircraft.
The LPF party got 17% of the votes in the May 2002 elections even without Fortuyn.
This story on the mystery surrounding the Fortuyn murder is not bad: http://www.uspoliticsonline.net/thre...ut-do-not-show

The official story of the murder is that the lone gunman - extreme left animal rights activist Volkert van der Graaf - waited for him with a loaded gun, when Fortuyn was interviewed for the radio in the Hilversum Media Park. When Fortuyn and radio presenter Ruud de Wild came out of the studio; Volkert ran behind both Fortuyn and shot 5 bullets into Fortuyn from a distance of 1.5 meter (standing behind him).
Then Volkert ran away (chased by the chauffeur of Fortuyn, Hans Smolders) when only a few minutes later he was arrested at a Texaco gas station by the Hilversum police with the help of the ME (riot squad) and hondenbrigade (dog squad).
Volkert was released from prison in May 2014 after 12 years in jail.
The state media reported that Volkert murdered Fortuyn for his anti-Islam views. It is unlikely that an animal activist would’ve murdered Fortuyn for his anti-Islam views. Animal activists are against the Halal, Islam way of slaughter: slitting animals throat to bleed them to death.

The well-known Dutch writer Thomas Ross investigated this matter with film maker Theo van Gogh (a friend of Fortuyn who was later killed by a Muslim “terrorist”). This video of an interview of Ross is the best information I found on the Fortuyn murder (Ross wrote an article in “De Journalist” which cannot be found on the internet), but is in Dutch: http://www.saulsplace.nl/post/876738...eniaal-complot
There was obviously a cover up: there were security cameras hanging in the Media Park; the tapes were never shown. 3 eye witnesses (De Wild, Sander de Heer and Jeroen Kijk) weren’t even questioned by the police the day of the shooting. Are there many people that would testify facts that the official story of a lone crazy gunman is bogus, knowing this could get you killed?
A shell case was found 10 meter from the murder, indicating that there was a second shooter. If all the shots were fired from 1.5 meter distance it should have made more damage in Fortuyn.
One of the shots in the head of Fortuyn come from in front of him and this was removed from the autopsy report (the autopsy report is suspiciously short), indicating that there was a second shooter.
Both Ruud de Wild and Albert de Booy (of the LPF party) saw Fortuyn was already slumping his knees before Volkert started shooting, indicating that a second shooter fired before Volkert (with a gun with a silencer). I haven’t found the quotes or interviews of De Wild and De Booy.
Riot and dog squad are not part of the Hilversum police, so they never could have been involved in the arrest of Volkert (only a few minutes after the shooting).
The ambulance was kept outside, with the ridiculous story of a computer crash, Fortuyn only got medical care some 20 minutes after the shooting (while the state media claimed this was in 9 minutes); after Volkert was arrested. It must be against regulations that a gate cannot open manually in case of computer crash (not even counting that a computer crash is improbable or that it wouldn’t take 20 minutes to restart).
On the following site is interesting information: http://www.isgp.nl/2012_10_Republican_Society
This is suspect because the debunking of the investigation by Thomas Ross is severely flawed. There’s a quote from Ruud de Wild, which doesn’t prove anything. It’s claimed that Volkert first fired 4 shots (from close range), then ran away to fire some more shots. It is known that Volkert was an inexperienced shooter that ran close to Fortuyn before shooting, because he’s such a bad shot. Nobody would shoot 4 times then run away, turning back around to fire more shots. I’ve seen eye witnesses say Volkert ran away and not firing more shots.

If Fortuyn was murdered by the Dutch government an obvious motive would be his resistance towards the F-35 JSF aircraft (of Lockheed Martin). At the present already 44.8 billion euro has been invested in the development of the JSF (and still not one is commercially available). It was planned that the Netherlands would buy 85 F-35’s for €61.5 million apiece, plus an additional estimated cost of 14.6 billion euro for 30 years (for things like maintenance), leading to a total cost of 20 billion euro (so an interesting sum).
What is never mentioned is that Fortuyn was not only a member of the Republikeinse Genootschap (Republican Society), but wanted a democratically elected president better sooner than later. Why was Fortuyn so dangerous to the family that rules the Netherlands in their ruthless, dictatorial way?
King Willem III (1817-1890) married Queen Emma when he was in his 60s and infertile because of syphilis and still had 2 legitimate heirs to his throne (that died suddenly). So the daughter of Emma, the later Queen Wilhelmina (born in 1880), was an illegitimate child and wasn’t entitled to the throne (the 2 legitimate sons of Willem III had already died): http://vivanepotista.com/post/508648...orful-house-of
According to the Dutch constitution (art. 24 Grondwet) only successors of Willem I can be head of state. If Fortuyn had been elected in the parliament he could have proposed a law to force the Dutch royals out.

So there you have it.
Motive that the Dutch Royal family wanted to get rid of Fortuyn (and fast!).
Evidence that the official story is not true.
Information removed from the internet and false rumours to hide what really happened.

[Firestarter]

After Pim Fortuyn was murdered his older brother, Marten, made some political statements in which he criticised that Pim wasn’t protected and that the murder wasn’t properly investigated. In 2015 he announced that he wanted to start a new political party PMF (Pim Marten Fortuyn).
On September 10, 2016 Marten Fortuyn died when he tried to escape from the psychiatric hospital where they had locked him up earlier this year, aged 73 (in Dutch): http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/2...Fortuyn__.html

The only additional information I found about the circumstances, is that Marten Fortuyn got injured while escaping and that he had given notice that he didn’t want to be reanimated.
From these 2 “facts” I conclude that Marten suffered a heart attack while trying to escape (am I the only one that finds this strange?). It is known that heart attacks can be induced (by drugs or electricity), and it’s suspicious that so little information has been made public.
The state media has stressed that Marten had to be locked up because of a mental disease. I would like to call it another great victory for psychiatry: Marten Fortuyn will not bother the Dutch establishment anymore.

[Firestarter]

One of the strange links in the Pim Fortuyn assassination is the Republican Society (Republikeins Genootschap). Fortuyn and his associate (the also murdered) Theo van Gogh were members of the Republican Society. Fortuyn murder "conspiracy theorist" Tomas Ross (Van Gogh's friend) was also a Republican Society member.
The first TV round table interview with witnesses of the Fortuyn murder was conducted by TV personalities Frits Barend and Jan Mulder, who were also members of the Republican Society.

The attorney for Pim Fortuyn murderer Volkert van der Graaf was none other than Britta Bohler, another member of the Republican Society!
See Republican Society members Femke Halsema (chair of the Green-Left Party 2002-2010 and current mayor of Amsterdam) with Britta Bohler; and in the small picture Halsema with Petra Lievense the ex-girlfriend of Van der Graaf.



More members of the supposedly "anti-monarchy" Republican Society...
Eberhard van der Laan, former attorney, who died "of cancer" as mayor of Amsterdam.
Willem Oltmans, the self-proclaimed journalist friend of the Dutch royals, who was awarded millions for being targeted by the Dutch government, and achieved worldwide notoriety for his conspiracies on the JFK murder.

Volkert van der Graaf's animal-right-activist group Milieu Offensief (Milieu Front) was headquartered at the same address as Milieudefensie (Milieu Defense), the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth, one of the environmental groups funded by the world elite. The Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth has naturally been financed by the Dutch state lottery, Nationale Postcode Loterij (one of the biggest funders of NGO's in the whole world).
Friends of the Earth was financed and in large part run by Prince Bernhard's 1001 Club, including its members: Robert Anderson, Maurice Strong, Rockefeller, Aurelio Peccei (subordinate of Gianni Agnelli) and the American billionaire Ted Turner.

Now with the pandemic this has gotten a little less publicity, but in 2019 we were bombarded in a sudden media hysteria on the environmental disaster caused nitrates. This new scare was cooked up through a court case by the Mobilisation for the Environment (MOB) of Johan Vollenbroek (who was knighted by then-Queen Beatrix in 2008).
In one of those strange coincidences, the main lawyer for MOB is one Valentijn Wösten, who had been the lawyer for the Milieu Offensief of Van der Graaf and Sjoerd van der Wouw in the 1990's, until the murder of Pim Fortuyn: https://isgp-studies.com/pim-fortuyn-assassination
(https://archive.is/bl6BZ)



And the following attorney was without a doubt a royal spie within the Pim Fortuyn campaign, the (also) openly gay Oscar Hammerstein. In 2015, Hammerstein was knighted by Willem-Alexander.
Hammerstein was the protege of the close friend of Beatrix, the gay paedophile, money laundering attorney and judge - Frits Salomonson.

In 1994, long-time associate of Salomonson, attorney Oscar Hammerstein (who was also an executive at Janzing BV), was “investigated” by the FIOD over laundering 17.5 million guilders drug money for the organisation of Klaas Bruinsma.
The dirty money was labelled as the profits from the trade in wood and rice by Guptar, and transferred to a Swiss bank account.
In July 1995, Hammerstein was acquitted in appeal.

Drugs-profits-for-Oil-wars

[Firestarter]

Volkert van der Graaf's animal-right-activist group Milieu Offensief (Milieu Front) was headquartered at the same address as Milieudefensie (Milieu Defense), the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth, one of the environmental groups funded by the world elite. The Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth has naturally been financed by the Dutch state lottery, Nationale Postcode Loterij (one of the biggest funders of NGO's in the whole world).
Friends of the Earth was financed and in large part run by Prince Bernhard's 1001 Club, including its members: Robert Anderson, Maurice Strong, Rockefeller, Aurelio Peccei (subordinate of Gianni Agnelli) and the American billionaire Ted Turner.

It's amazing that so very often when I investigate "different" topics, I find information that links them together.

See promoters of the Nationale Postcode Loterij (from left): Joost van Lanschot (VSBfonds), Boudewijn Poelmann, Mark Rutte (MP), Alexander Rinnooy Kan (of the Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds), Fred Teeven (Secretary of State), Halbe Zijlstra (Secretary of State), and Joop van den Ende (media mogul).

The-Tides-Foundation-NWO