Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
The Secret US Prisons You’ve Never Heard of Before | Will Potter | TED Talks
Posted on September 9, 2016by David Robinson
Investigative journalist Will Potter is the only reporter who has been inside a Communications Management Unit, or CMU, within a US prison. These units were opened secretly, and they radically alter how prisoners are treated — even preventing them from hugging their children.
Potter, a TED Fellow, shows us who is imprisoned here, and how the government is trying to keep them hidden. “The message was clear,” he says. “Don’t talk about this place.”
“What people in power do when no-one is watching!”
Francis Schaeffer Cox is a libertarian political prisoner who was sentenced to 26 years. He is being held in USP Marion, IL with an expected parole date of 10/03/33.
h
Francis Schaeffer Cox is being held in the CMU in the Marion facility. He is decidedly a POLITICAL PRISONER suffering at the whim of the crime syndicate called our federal government.
That crime syndicate is a mostly foreign owned, for profit corporation masquerading as our government. Schaeffer spoke out about those crimes while he was in Montana on December 9th 2009. If you want the real story from the source, you can watch his inspiring Montana speech here.
If you don’t believe what I said about our so called “federal government” being a crime syndicate you need to read the articles on this website
by Judge Anna Von Reitz from Big Lake Alaska.
Or you can go to her website at annavonreitz.com
Pfizer Macht Frei!
Openly Straight Man, Danke, Awarded Top Rated Influencer. Community Standards Enforcer.
Quiz: Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!
Short Income Tax Video
The Income Tax Is An Excise, And Excise Taxes Are Privilege Taxes
The Federalist Papers, No. 15:
Except as to the rule of appointment, the United States have an indefinite discretion to make requisitions for men and money; but they have no authority to raise either by regulations extending to the individual citizens of America.
"Outbreeding", lol....birth rates are tied to infant mortality rates in humans, and poorer countries therefore have 5-6 kids per family...but only 2 on average survive to reproduce (same for richer countries). The difference is the richer countries only need to have about 2 kids on average to reach that 2 kids reproducing. Lower child mortality.
This is hard wired in mammals...if you shoot a lot of local coyotes, for example, the females go into heat earlier and have larger litters. Humans are no different. It's not races outbreeding...it's out-birthing. We hit global peak child a long time ago, hence the overpopulation thing is a myth. All countries will be having 2 kids and 2 survive to reproduce, or less, by 2040-2050. Then population worldwide declines slowly. Watch this video:
Umm, this is completely not the case currently. Let me first state the obvious:
• Birth rates in humans are tied to.... how many human females give birth. That is the only thing it's tied to. It's what the term means!
OK, now that we have that cleared up, is it true what you say: are all the kids in poor countries just dying off, and the attrition means the surviving-children rate is the same as the rich countries, and their populations are staying stable?
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!
AAahhhh ha ha ha. Ho ho ho ho ho.
No, the population growth rate varies a *lot* in different countries.
Now we all love Professor Rosling [mostly for the lovely animated charts he uses in his "the world is getting richer and poverty will be cured soon (except in Africa)" video]. So let's just use an example straight from the talk you posted: in Bangladesh in just the last few decades, population has gone from 50 million to 150 million (!!!).
Not by having two surviving kids each it didn't!!!!!!
That is true for coyotes. It is not true for rabbits (or if it is, the change is extremely minor and thus undetectable by any test we could devise). Rabbits have a more r-selected reproduction strategy. They are shooting to have maximum offspring in minimum time, all the time. Always, always.This is hard wired in mammals...if you shoot a lot of local coyotes, for example, the females go into heat earlier and have larger litters. Humans are no different.
Humans can change between strategies. Really, humans can do whatever we jolly well want because we have big brains and free will. But some people will choose an r strategy, and others a K strategy. This will be largely determined by biology, if there is no conscious awareness of the phenomenon (and there mostly isn't). Some people will just reproduce and reproduce until they reach the brink of starvation. Starvation is the only factor that ever will put a limit on their increase. All human populations would probably be naturally inclined to do this, actually, in the absence of powerful cultural technologies throwing a big monkey wrench into nature's gears.
OK, this is going to get too long if I try to explain everything. Bottom line:
• Some populations are growing much faster than others. Fact.
• Things are not as simple nor as deterministic as you say (All the growth is coming to an end. "All countries will be having 2 kids and 2 survive to reproduce, or less, by 2040-2050. Then population worldwide declines slowly.")
What determines population growth or shrinkage? Human Action. Human Choices. Individual judgment calls and life decisions. Are you really so sure you know exactly what all humans are going to be choosing? Tomorrow much less thirty years from now?
Anyway, what is going on right now -- by everyone's admission and as the clear facts clearly show! -- is that blacks and asians in various third world peasant countries in Africa and Asia are greatly out-reproducing the Caucasians in Europe and its outposts. Even if everything in the future turns out exactly as Rosling prophesies, that means that in 2050 when the world human population finally levels off, it will be a population with billions and billions more negroid and asiatic humans and not billions more - actually fewer! In absolute numbers! -- white caucasoid humans.
That is just the fact.
Last edited by helmuth_hubener; 09-30-2016 at 02:01 PM.
Connect With Us