View Poll Results: Gary/Weld 2016?

Voters
63. You may not vote on this poll
  • No

    22 34.92%
  • Yes

    25 39.68%
  • Undecided

    16 25.40%
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 89

Thread: Will you vote for Gary/Weld 2016?

  1. #31
    Heck yeah!

    The most experienced LP ticket with two very popular 2-term liberal Republicans governors in each of their states. They'll be getting good media exposure because of this which should give them poll ratings well over the 15% necessary to get into the rigged presidential debates.

    A win/win ticket in my book (which is based on realism, not idealism).



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by William Tell View Post
    force bakers to make gay Nazi cakes.
    I can't wait for the day that this is the most pressing issue in American.



  4. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  5. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by farreri View Post
    I can't wait for the day that this is the most pressing issue in American.
    Exactly

  6. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by andy2044 View Post
    As a proud and devout Catholic, I cannot. As a proud libertarian, I cannot.
    The not pro life thing was a major sticking point for me. But considering the alternatives last time and this I went with Johnson and will agian. He's not going to be potus anyway so in the end it really doesn't matter.

  7. #35
    Hell no. This is the philosophically weakest ticket a third party has fielded in at least twenty years.

  8. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by farreri View Post
    Heck yeah!

    The most experienced LP ticket with two very popular 2-term liberal Republicans governors in each of their states. They'll be getting good media exposure because of this which should give them poll ratings well over the 15% necessary to get into the rigged presidential debates.

    A win/win ticket in my book (which is based on realism, not idealism).
    I don't think they will make the debates, but might get the 5%.

    Quote Originally Posted by farreri View Post
    I can't wait for the day that this is the most pressing issue in American.
    Unfortunately, the media has to power to make it one.

  9. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by farreri View Post
    I can't wait for the day that this is the most pressing issue in American.
    So... you don't live in North Carolina then.

  10. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by andy2044 View Post
    Darrell Castle by a landslide?
    CP not on the ballot in NC. NC has the most restrictive ballot access in the US.

  11. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by farreri View Post
    I can't wait for the day that this is the most pressing issue in American.
    Maybe they could be talked into supporting mandatory veganism.
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    It's a balance between appeasing his supporters, appeasing the deep state and reaching his own goals.
    ~Resident Badgiraffe




  12. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
    Hell no. This is the philosophically weakest ticket a third party has fielded in at least twenty years.
    What do you mean by that?

    Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
    So... you don't live in North Carolina then.
    How would Gary supporting that issue change what NC has already done?



  13. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  14. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by William Tell View Post
    Maybe they could be talked into supporting mandatory veganism.
    Where did that come from?

  15. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by William Tell View Post
    Maybe they could be talked into supporting mandatory veganism.
    At last government would be for the good of livestock. But the sheeple will still get screwed.
    "The Patriarch"

  16. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    At last government would be for the good of livestock. But the sheeple will still get screwed.
    They have been taking a pretty good care of canines.

  17. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by farreri View Post
    What do you mean by that?
    Gary Johnson's understanding of "liberty" seems to be "the stuff I like to do, and damn people who want to do other stuff." He is as irresponsible with the Constitution as both Major Parties. This cake baking gay marriage bathroom bull$#@! is front and center right now in NC, in large part because of our own stupidity, but that does not negate the fact that the federal government is acting in contravention to the pursuant powers per Article 6 of the US Constitution, and that over the last 6-odd years Johnson has consistently advocated continuing - if not expanding - the unconstitutional social enforcement policies of the Obama administration.

    How would Gary supporting that issue change what NC has already done?
    These are prominent issues in this state because the federal government is actively working to enforce these illegitimate powers on our State. One of the biggest threats NC faces today is federal overreach, and the federal is overreaching like a colonoscopy into NC right now around these very issues. The ones that Gary Johnson supports and has decreed "Constitutional Rights." WHy am I going to vote for more of the same garbage that Obama is already doing?

  18. #45
    I will be voting for Gary Johnson. He may be the best president we have had in modern times by a large margin.

    He's no Ron Paul but if he's half the candidate Ron was then he is a huge improvement to any other choice.
    Last edited by Mikezelot; 05-29-2016 at 11:03 PM.

  19. #46
    Nope. Principle before party. Even if it is a third party. The L.P. had an excellent chance to be relevant. TMOT would have been a better choice than Johnson/Weld. Even if Grayson would have been the V.P. pick I might have considered the L.P. As it stands, nope. Just nope.

  20. #47
    "Hey, let's support a ticket as antigun as Clinton!"

    said no candidate ever with a hope in hell of drawing any of the conservative vote.

    lol

    I'm starting to think the real function of Parties et al is a corporate suicide pact.

    Step 1) Every participating Party commits suicide by nominating the worst candidate possible.

    Step 2) Whicher candidate survives the suicide attempt, is made leader of the Planet the following January.

  21. #48
    is he the least evil? can't say yet. but I would like to see him in the debates. this could easily be a 5 way race, with a socialist (Green Party) and/or fascist (Bill Kristol's party)



  22. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  23. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
    "Hey, let's support a ticket as antigun as Clinton!"

    said no candidate ever with a hope in hell of drawing any of the conservative vote.

    lol

    I'm starting to think the real function of Parties et al is a corporate suicide pact.

    Step 1) Every participating Party commits suicide by nominating the worst candidate possible.

    Step 2) Whicher candidate survives the suicide attempt, is made leader of the Planet the following January.
    Makes sense to me. Whichever $#@!ty candidate that wins has a "mandate of the people." Who can argue with that?

  24. #50
    Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
    WHy am I going to vote for more of the same garbage that Obama is already doing?
    You seriously trying to tell me they are one in the same?

  25. #51
    I wonder who all the Negative Nancy's think we should vote for instead?

  26. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by farreri View Post
    You seriously trying to tell me they are one in the same?
    Insofar as expanding the unconstitutional federal reach over "morality" yes. Indeed, Johnson may be more of a statist than Obama. Obama would not even imagine federally forcing a Jew to bake a Nazi cake, but Gary Johnson can. In the area of the federal government enforcing 'morality' against the several states, Johnson is a bigger threat than Obama.

  27. #53
    Quote Originally Posted by farreri View Post
    I wonder who all the Negative Nancy's think we should vote for instead?
    Isn't that the exact same argument the Demoblicans have used to make us vote for them for like...oh, 40 years now?
    http://glenbradley.net/share/aleksan...nitsyn_4-t.gif “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

  28. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
    Insofar as expanding the unconstitutional federal reach over "morality" yes. Indeed, Johnson may be more of a statist than Obama. Obama would not even imagine federally forcing a Jew to bake a Nazi cake, but Gary Johnson can. In the area of the federal government enforcing 'morality' against the several states, Johnson is a bigger threat than Obama.

  29. #55
    Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
    Isn't that the exact same argument the Demoblicans have used to make us vote for them for like...oh, 40 years now?
    Sure. So who should I vote for instead?

  30. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by farreri View Post
    You seriously trying to tell me they are one in the same?
    Insomuch as neither one is what they claim to be. pretty much.
    "The Patriarch"



  31. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  32. #57
    Quote Originally Posted by farreri View Post
    Sure. So who should I vote for instead?
    What would happen if you didn't vote? Would there be a permanent mark of shame on your family tree?
    "The Patriarch"

  33. #58
    Quote Originally Posted by farreri View Post
    Sure. So who should I vote for instead?
    I'm voting for "Giant Meteor."

  34. #59
    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    Insomuch as neither one is what they claim to be. pretty much.
    Gary is/was the CEO a pot company. I feel pretty confident he's pro-pot--just like he claims.

  35. #60
    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    What would happen if you didn't vote? Would there be a permanent mark of shame on your family tree?
    Should I feel ashamed for voting for Gary last time?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •