Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Mexican Firsters protest in California
http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...mps-motorcade/
A nativist protectionist. Ohhh my goodness. Well the most libertarian President of the 20th century had no problem being a protectionist.
https://coolidgefoundation.org/blog/...l-dinner-pail/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5puwTrLRhmw#t=15
And he certainly didn't have any problems with strict immigration laws
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-h...mmigration-law
Last edited by William R; 04-29-2016 at 08:45 PM.
Washington Republicans and political pundits keep depicting Paul as some kind of ideological mutation, the conservative equivalent of a black swan. They’re wrong. Ask any historically-minded conservative who the most conservative president of the 20th Century was, and they’ll likely say Calvin Coolidge. No president tried as hard to make the federal government irrelevant. It’s said that Coolidge was so terrified of actually doing something as president that he tried his best not even to speak. But in 1925, Silent Cal did open his mouth long enough to spell out his foreign policy vision, and what he said could be emblazoned on a Ron Paul for President poster: “The people have had all the war, all the taxation, and all the military service they want.”
Small government conservatism, the kind to which today’s Republicans swear fealty, was born in the 1920s not only in reaction to the progressive movement’s efforts to use government to regulate business, but in reaction to World War I, which conservatives rightly saw as a crucial element of the government expansion they feared. To be a small government conservative in the 1920s and 1930s was, for the most part, to vehemently oppose military spending while insisting that the US never, ever get mired in another European war.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...p-in-2012.html
Last edited by LibertyEagle; 04-29-2016 at 09:26 PM.
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
lol. Why don't you ask Bryan. It has never been a libertarian forum. It has been open to anyone and everyone who supported Ron Paul, when he was running. Now, it's about the guidelines. Oh, and by the way, Ender, RP would have never been elected, nor been able to stay in the House, had it not been for the gold bugs and the Birchers. They are his core; they are the remnant.
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
So you have no rational argument for why I should tolerate you, but not Mexicans.
Yo comprendo...
...but why aren't you inferior to Mexicans?
Yea...
...actually it is.
I can understand that leftists like yourself wouldn't be comfortable here.
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
Yes, you did, and not just in the post I quoted. Stop it with the strawmen, erowe. It's gotten way past being old.
Originally Posted by erowe1
I never said anything supporting either of those. But the solution to the problems of big government isn't even more big government, which is what protectionism and immigration restrictions are.
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
This is what you replied to: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...=1#post6206701
And I quoted it in the post up above.
Stop playing games, erowe.
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
Funny you should bring this up. Where did the "Texicans" come from? They were immigrants. Where from? America. Estimates are about 30k Anglos to 8k Mexicans. They had a revolution after Santa Anna dissolved the Mexican constitution. The "Texicans" also seceded from the Fed Union. Didn't work out for them.
Oh, the irony.
Connect With Us