Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
That would be the absolute worst thing Rand could do and would marginalize him for the duration of Trump's term. Rand needs to get over losing the primary. His defeat had nothing to do with Trump and there is absolutely no reason for sour grapes. The coming Trump Presidency presents a golden opportunity for the liberty movement (as today's fantastically anti-interventionist FP speech confirmed) and Rand would be spiting his face if he continues to harbor resentment against Trump. People like Molyneux, Rockwell, and Alex Jones are already using the Trump train to their own benefit. Rand needs to hop on board.
What a load of horse$#@!. You can't use trump, he uses you. The end. Alex Jones, Rockwell and the lot are fools for thinking any different. The guy cares nothing about liberty, and in fact may be doing this whole thing for $#@!s and giggles at our expense. And also, Rand needs to go his own way and support what he believes in, he would be a terrible soldier. What Rand believes in, for the most part, is 180 removed from what Trump believes in.
You make it sound like its personal. Rand doesnt care about the personal thing, what is galling is that bastard stole the fire of a movement and is going to deploy it to harm our freedom.
Last edited by WTLaw; 04-27-2016 at 07:36 PM.
“I don’t think that there will be any curtailing of Donald Trump as president,” he said. "He controls the media, he controls the sentiment [and] he controls everybody. He’s the one who will resort to executive orders more so than [President] Obama ever used them." - Ron Paul
* See my visitor message area for caveats related to my posting history here.
* Also, I have effectively retired from all social media including posting here and are basically opting out of anything to do with national politics or this country on federal or state level and rather focusing locally. I may stop by from time to time to discuss philosophy on a general level related to Libertarian schools of thought and application in the real world.
Anything else is in fact helping an interventionist like Hillary win the Presidency and that is a fact since the race now comes down to Hillary vs Trump. Like some of the others here you are have demonstrated your a fraud and not true to the beliefs of non-intervention preached by the Pauls over the years.
You are choosing a candidate that is against auditing the fed and wants to shoot Russian planes out of the sky. Yes, fraud indeed.
* See my visitor message area for caveats related to my posting history here.
* Also, I have effectively retired from all social media including posting here and are basically opting out of anything to do with national politics or this country on federal or state level and rather focusing locally. I may stop by from time to time to discuss philosophy on a general level related to Libertarian schools of thought and application in the real world.
I'm not choosing a candidate that is anything of the type. Your "You're either with Trump or you're with Hillary" false paradigm is what proves that you are the fraud in the liberty movement. This very forum is "NON-SUPPORTIVE" of Trump. That does not mean that this site is "for Hillary." Logic fail.
Rand should be the bigger man and do the right thing.
Attila the Trump is the future of the GOP.
Donald Trump > SJW ass-tears
* See my visitor message area for caveats related to my posting history here.
* Also, I have effectively retired from all social media including posting here and are basically opting out of anything to do with national politics or this country on federal or state level and rather focusing locally. I may stop by from time to time to discuss philosophy on a general level related to Libertarian schools of thought and application in the real world.
My goodness, if this is true, the loss of principles is complete. Any respect I had left for this man, as his father's son, would be gone. If you guys support this guy for President again over an actual liberty candidate, out of some nonsense nepotism-esque worship of his last name, I swear you are all dead to me. Endorsing the nominee is different than endorsing before the Convention is over. This is horrid.
How can any liberty candidate do this? How can you endorse an authoritarian whose rhetoric borders on fascism (deportation of millions, mostly peaceful religious minority on a registry, economic nationalist protectionism, 3 chances to denounce Putin killing journalists and not denouncing it, calling it "leadership", drug warrior, etc, etc., etc.)? Some of you people have lost your minds judging by the posts I've seen over the last several months, if indeed you ever had your minds to begin with!Rand To Endorse Trump
By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
April 28, 2016
Before Indiana, according to supposed insiders.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/politica...endorse-trump/
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
Lew Rockwell just lost some credibility in my book as a news source. The article Lew's post is based on is garbage clickbait with zero substance to it. The article is based entirely on a quote from Charles Krauthammer that mentioned Rand's name but said nothing about him endorsing Trump.
Does Lew post crapola like this on his blog all the time? I haven't seen anything like it before but I don't visit his blog very often either.
Last edited by jct74; 04-30-2016 at 02:24 PM.
It's a shame the chairman of the misses institute would involve himself in such BS, I don't think I will be donating anymore, clearly Trump is not an Austrian.
Connect With Us