It's in the article posted yesterday - https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/03/...tarians-trump/
"What about the Presidential race in the fall, when there will be a Libertarian Party candidate in contention? My colleagues and I at LFT have decided that the sole purpose of this organization is to help Mr. Donald Trump attain the Republican Party’s nomination for president. When and if that occurs, we plan to disband LFT. We confine ourselves toward working toward the day when Mr. Trump receives the nomination of the Republican Party for president — and nothing else."
The article is kind of contradictory, with Ralph Raico earlier quoted as saying "The Queen of Chaos would be the most dangerous person ever to fill the office of president." So I'm not sure why Block would disband it after the primaries if they're in agreement about that. Then again, I can't see any way trump's nomination will affect the RNC and the party apparatus one way or another, certainly not as much as RP activists and the later Tea Party did at least temporarily.
To me there's not a dime's worth of difference between Hillary, trump, Cruz, Kasich et al. I set Sanders apart because of my extreme distaste for the brazen promotion of socialism. I don't want socialism to be fashionable. I'd even rather see someone at least try to disguise it like trump and the rest do. But if LfT find Hillary so (relatively) horrifying, why don't they push through to the end for trump? It's sad to see some of the most visible spokesmen of Austrian economics displaying such a lack of common sense.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us