Geolocation Technology and Privacy
HEARING DATE: MARCH 2, 2016 10:00 AM
PURPOSE:
-To consider what the Fourth Amendment means in the digital age and examine the level of protection citizens have over their geolocation data.
-To review law enforcement’s use of devices, data, and technology that obtain geolocation information of individuals.
-To examine the Department of Justice’s policies and procedures governing the use of geolocation data.
BACKGROUND:
-This hearing follows an Oversight IT Subcommittee hearing on Stingray surveillance technology in October 2015.
-The Supreme Court has provided limited clarification in recent years about whether a warrant is required for law enforcement to obtain geolocation information.
-While the Court has now required a warrant for placing a GPS tracker on a private vehicle, and required a warrant before searching the contents of a cell phone, the Court has not yet weighed in on whether a warrant requirement exists for all geolocation information, such as OnStar or other wireless device transmissions that reveal geolocation over time.
Connect With Us