Meet the Billionaire Pedophile Pal of Donald Trump

[Mike4Freedom]

McConnell was the only Republican running when Rand endorsed him. Bevin entered the race after Rand's endorsement. So how is that a concession?

Anyways that isn't what your fellow Trump supporter stated but nice try with the white knight attempt.

Trump also donated 60000 to mitch mcconnels superPAC. He donated 50000 in 2013 and 10000 in 2014. Nothing but crickets from the media about these donations. The media is painting trump as anti-establishment. It is all a big WWF act.

[devil21]

Of course he could have. He was doing it successfully for a while. He was giving voice to issues that matter to the average person, which is what made him at one point the leading candidate for the GOP nod.

And then for some inexplicable reason, he abandoned that. He decided to reshape himself to make him more palatable to DC insiders, the RNC, and media pundits - and in doing so lost the mantle of the outsider's voice. By the time the debates rolled around he had abandoned almost everything that distinguished him from just another DC politician.

Whatever route Rand chose, TPTB and media were going to promote the exact opposite. If Rand had chose the bombastic Trump-esque route (probably not possible since Rand is logical and not capable of carnival-barker antics but just for argument sake) the media would have called him a dangerous lunatic that's not Presidential and wouldn't you like a polished and calm candidate like this CFR puppet instead?

[Cleaner44]

By association I'm sure we could pin Ron Paul and Rand Paul the same way.

For sure. From what I hear Jesus was pals with prostitutes.

[juleswin]

Isn't it weird that Trump and the Clintons are not just sharing the same political views, but the same friends and the same scandals. A vote for Trump is a vote for Clinton.

[juleswin]

All this talk about sex scandals and no talk of Virginia Roberts? what gives?

Now I wonder if Gary Johnson would bring her to the debates. That would be one heck of a move by him.

[enhanced_deficit]

Isn't it weird that Trump and the Clintons are not just sharing the same political views, but the same friends and the same scandals. A vote for Trump is a vote for Clinton.

EM.
There are some noteable exceptions:





Some of SWC Hillarry's "friends"/"bosses"/political bed-fellows have been accused of far far more heinous crimes against underage children of color than are being alleged in OP news.

Caution: Very graphic content involving children

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/201...-15droneC1.png

http://gopthedailydose.com/wp-conten...obamadrone.png

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...dd008e92ef.jpg

[Zippyjuan]

Epstein is more of a Clinton buddy than Trump's.

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

Epstein likes to tell people that he's a loner, a man who's never touched alcohol or drugs, and one whose nightlife is far from energetic. And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges. "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,'' Trump booms from a speakerphone. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life."

[enhanced_deficit]

Not sure what is the relevance here or what you were trying to say. All children adore their parents.

[KEEF]

Whatever route Rand chose, TPTB and media were going to promote the exact opposite. If Rand had chose the bombastic Trump-esque route (probably not possible since Rand is logical and not capable of carnival-barker antics but just for argument sake) the media would have called him a dangerous lunatic that's not Presidential and wouldn't you like a polished and calm candidate like this CFR puppet instead?

[lilymc]

nice.. Trump for the win!

What is "nice", Trump singing the praises of a pedophile?

[RonPaulMall]

If Rand had chose the bombastic Trump-esque route (probably not possible since Rand is logical and not capable of carnival-barker antics but just for argument sake) the media would have called him a dangerous lunatic that's not Presidential and wouldn't you like a polished and calm candidate like this CFR puppet instead?

In other words, they would have tried the same strategy that they used on Trump which Trump successfully countered.

[CPUd]

AQUA BUDDHA

[dannno]

Epstein is more of a Clinton buddy than Trump's.

Ya wtf..

[John F Kennedy III]

I agree with this. Rand didn't move an inch. The same Rand we had in January was the same Rand in 2015, 2012, 2010.

That's absolutely not true. Have you forgotten the exodus of members who refused to support Rand when he suddenly changed on several issues, endorsed Romney, sucked up to Israel, etc?

[eleganz]

He could sacrifice babies to Satan on live TV for all it matters.

Trump has made himself into the vessel for decades of built-up anti-establishment resentment, and it will not go away easily.

Could have been Rand, but he liked Mitch McConnell more than he liked us.

Silly to say. Rand's endorsement of the turtle did not kill his chance at the nomination. Rand was set up pretty nicely until Trump joined the race.

[eleganz]

That's absolutely not true. Have you forgotten the exodus of members who refused to support Rand when he suddenly changed on several issues, endorsed Romney, sucked up to Israel, etc?

You know whats absolutely not true? That the membership of RPF is in anyway representative of the GOP electorate.

Jesus people quit living in the libertarian bubble.


Edit : Got a neg rep for calling John F Kennedy III out for making silly comparisons. Nice!

[alucard13mm]

You know whats absolutely not true? That the membership of RPF is in anyway representative of the GOP electorate.

Jesus people quit living in the libertarian bubble.


Edit : Got a neg rep for calling John F Kennedy III out for making silly comparisons. Nice!

Wow eleganz you are back haha. You dissapeared for months.

[alucard13mm]

Silly to say. Rand's endorsement of the turtle did not kill his chance at the nomination. Rand was set up pretty nicely until Trump joined the race.

Cruz as well. Cruz, trump and rand all wanted the same base of voters. I think rand wouldve had a chance against trump if cruz wasnt there.

[devil21]

In other words, they would have tried the same strategy that they used on Trump which Trump successfully countered.

Huh? The media gave Trump all the attention he wanted and barely covered anyone else in the race. It was plain to see that the media purposely set Trump up to be the nominee.

[GunnyFreedom]

That's absolutely not true. Have you forgotten the exodus of members who refused to support Rand when he suddenly changed on several issues, endorsed Romney, sucked up to Israel, etc?

Yes, I very clearly remember a pluck-ton of people throwing him under the bus because he said the exact same things as Ron, but said them in :gasp: Republican instead of Libertarian. I remember it like it was yesterday. Most of those same people are now Trumpaloompas.

[Ender]

Huh? The media gave Trump all the attention he wanted and barely covered anyone else in the race. It was plain to see that the media purposely set Trump up to be the nominee.

Yep.

I've been saying this from the beginning but whenever I do, I'm called all the TrumpLingo bad names.

[John F Kennedy III]

Yes, I very clearly remember a pluck-ton of people throwing him under the bus because he said the exact same things as Ron, but said them in :gasp: Republican instead of Libertarian. I remember it like it was yesterday. Most of those same people are now Trumpaloompas.

Also not true.

[fcreature]

McConnell was the only Republican running when Rand endorsed him. Bevin entered the race after Rand's endorsement. So how is that a concession?

Anyways that isn't what your fellow Trump supporter stated but nice try with the white knight attempt.

What the revisionists forget to mention is that Rand's endorsement of McConnell effectively got Bevin elected as governor. Bevin never would have been elected had Rand not done that. He would have lost his Senate race, and then would have lost the gubernatorial race. Instead Bevin got the full support of the Paul & McConnell political machines in KY. Rand has shaped Kentucky Republican politics magnificently, even moving them to a republican nomination process.

This McConnell endorsement issue has been nothing more than a distraction talking point used by opposition. It's a shame that people here buy into it. Not surprising though, because they're also the same people pushing Trump right now.

[fcreature]

That's absolutely not true. Have you forgotten the exodus of members who refused to support Rand when he suddenly changed on several issues, endorsed Romney, sucked up to Israel, etc?

haha are you referring to those same members who came back supporting Trump because he's "anti-establishment".

Sheesh. This is the false reality we're subjected to around here now.

[GunnyFreedom]

Also not true.

lol, well oh kay then.

[John F Kennedy III]

haha are you referring to those same members who came back supporting Trump because he's "anti-establishment".

Sheesh. This is the false reality we're subjected to around here now.

No idea who came back doing what. Awesome though to see people pretending Rand has been exactly the same since 2010 when that's clearly not the case. Well to anyone who is being honest with themselves anyway.

[fcreature]

No idea who came back doing what. Awesome though to see people pretending Rand has been exactly the same since 2010 when that's clearly not the case. Well to anyone who is being honest with themselves anyway.

Perhaps you should elaborate a bit. As of now, you've provided no facts that back up your claims.

[John F Kennedy III]

Perhaps you should elaborate a bit. As of now, you've provided no facts that back up your claims.

I don't care to. It's simple enough for anyone to go through old forum threads and see the differences. Gunny was around then, he's just being utterly dishonest.

[GunnyFreedom]

No idea who came back doing what. Awesome though to see people pretending Rand has been exactly the same since 2010 when that's clearly not the case. Well to anyone who is being honest with themselves anyway.

If I were self deluding then I would probably back Johnson. Kind of like some others around here.

[GunnyFreedom]

I don't care to. It's simple enough for anyone to go through old forum threads and see the differences. Gunny was around then, he's just being utterly dishonest.

Bull$#@!. Quote me where I have ever told a lie, or retract your bogus accusation. I am one of the few (5-10% of us) who have remained intellectually ideologically and internally consistent since 2004 at least. I don't know WTF happened to YOU, but your accusations of dishonesty reflect more on your broken brain than they do anything about me.