With Rand out of the race, it's pretty obvious that whoever wins, from whichever party, is going to be horrible.
With respect to policy, I don't think it much matters who wins: they're all about the same on the important issues.
However, it could matter a great deal with respect to how the liberty movement is positioned going forward.
For instance, if a GOPer wins we may have to wait 8 years for another attempt at the Presidency (primarying a sitting President is rarely attempted, for good reason). On the other hand, a GOPer win carves out a bigger space for a conservative/libertarian opposition movement within the GOP, as developed in the latter years of the Bush administration (whereas, with a Democrat in office, the party tends to rally together, united by a common enemy). Another angle: if it's a GOPer, do we want somebody who pays lip service to libertarian positions (to give the ideas wider currency), or an overt establishment type (because a fake libertarian would just give libertarian ideas a bad name)? Lots of considerations...
...I don't yet have a definite opinion, myself.
Your thoughts?
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us