The guy has many many quotes that would get him destroyed while being vetted, he would look horrible on stage, and is poor at contentious conversation. He would be merced in debates. No thanks.
They didn't have a 0% chance of success.Originally Posted by K466
Can we please keep our EYES on the BALL and get a Paul in the White House 2016 !!!!
$#@!. :/ Rand is a Senator is he not ?
Unless you are talking about Paul Ryan I have some really bad news for you.
In New Zealand:
The Coastguard is a Charity
Air Traffic Control is a private company run on user fees
The DMV is a private non-profit
Rescue helicopters and ambulances are operated by charities and are plastered with corporate logos
The agriculture industry has zero subsidies
5% of the national vote, gets you 5 seats in Parliament
A tax return has 4 fields
Business licenses aren't a thing
Prostitution is legal
We have a constitutional right to refuse any type of medical care
That's a yes or no?
Success is strictly defined as 50.1% of the vote?
"Gradualism in theory is perpetuity in practice." ~ William Lloyd Garrison
STRATEGY: Three Essential Guidelines for the Liberty Movement
Liberty Policy Journal
Striking at the Root
I'm saying that all of the Paul campaigns had a chance of success.
Whereas, I don't think a Judge Nap campaign has any chance of success at all, so I'm not interested.
...also, I don't think it would be all that educational, Nap is not Ron.
Ron Paul had no chance of winning the white House, but a 100% chance of success in awakening, educating, uniting, organizing, and rallying an army for liberty.
I think the Judge can do this as well. A number of you have questioned his ability to carry the message. I don't really understand that. Have you watched his lectures given at the Mises Institute? He is quite a prolific author too. I think there is a good bit of substance in the Judge.
Again, I ask, was not the radical idealism Ron Paul promoted in his presidential runs the most successful event advancing the cause of liberty in recent times? If so, we need to find the next person to replicate it, and who is a better option than Andrew Napolitano for 2020?
I'm not stuck on the judge, I just haven't heard any names that would be more qualified while still sticking to Ron's strategy of radical idealism (vs. watering down the message and compromising).
Last edited by K466; 02-12-2016 at 05:41 PM.
"Gradualism in theory is perpetuity in practice." ~ William Lloyd Garrison
STRATEGY: Three Essential Guidelines for the Liberty Movement
Liberty Policy Journal
Striking at the Root
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us