By backtracking on ISIS, Rand helped seal his single digit status. The whole framework of the debate is war hawk heaven ("there's an evil radical irrational group out there, they can't be reasoned with, they just want to kill us, they could be anywhere, so we have to fight them forever, everywhere on earth, until we win"). Rand can't get through until he short-circuits this "threat-threat-threat" narrative, as it is the foundation justifying ongoing, unending, unlimited militarism and surveillance. With 800,000 dead civilians on the Mideast side after 15 years of war, who actually has been threatened more?
It's all about keeping the US enmeshed in war and empire, and justifying the above civilian body count. Pointing out that the US/West created ISIS cuts through this scam like butter, as it points out there IS a scam going on, and that there is a rational covert op basis for their actions,
not craziness. The beheadings are done for their manipulative effect, not out of hateful insanity (obviously the US establishment only care about them for their pro-war usefulness, as they have not been upset about the Saudi government performing mass executions by beheading). ISIS, like Al Qaeda before it, is a cynical invention of moderate, secular intelligence, not radical religion. Sen Gillibrand has admitted who created ISIS, and Putin has pointed out that most of the ISIS fighters are simply paid mercenaries, in this amazing monologue:
For further background reading:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-isi...xposed/5436019
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-cont...-version11.pdf
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/11/...rld-order.html
Originally Posted by enhanced_deficit
Just checked old news, Trumpster may be more dangerous candidate than SWC team's projections so far.
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us