7th Grader Told His Star Wars Shirt Isn't Allowed In School

[Suzanimal]

ROSENBERG, TX (KTRK) -- A 7th grader in Rosenberg says he was forced by school administrators to cover up his Star Wars t-shirt.

Joe Southern says his son, Colton, wore a shirt depicting the "Star Wars - The Force Awakens" logo, along with a Storm Trooper holding a weapon, to class Thursday at George Junior High School. He's apparently worn it to school several times before without any issue.

On Thursday, though, school officials told Colton the shirt was banned because it has a gun, or at least a picture of what in the movie is weapon.

"It's political correctness run amok. You're talking about a Star Wars t-shirt, a week before the biggest movie of the year comes out. It has nothing to do with guns or making a stand. It's just a Star Wars shirt," Southern said.

A spokesperson for Lamar Consolidated Independent School District says the LCISD secondary school handbook spells out potential violations of dress code. The list includes "symbols oriented toward violence."

Administrators say they did not reprimand the student, though they could have required him to change or assigned him in-school suspension. They say they only required him to zip up his jacket.

Southern says the incident, in his opinion, amounts to a violation of the first amendment. He says the weapon shown is fictional as is the character holding it and that any implication his son would hurt anyone would be incorrect.

"He's a Boy Scout, active in church, volunteers at Brazos Bend State Park. There's not a violent bone in his body. He's just an excited kid for the movie," said Southern.

http://abc13.com/news/7th-graders-st...chool/1119401/

[sparebulb]

The parents must really care about their children by going the extra mile by putting them in public school.

[fisharmor]

IOU a rep, sparebulb

[presence]

meanwhile junior drone pilots are killin' it...

For the first time ever, the Air Force Junior ROTC instructors and cadets based at Lamar Consolidated High School earned an overall unit assessment score of “Exceeds Standards.”

[Ender]

IOU a rep, sparebulb

DONE.

[DamianTV]

So if kids dont know anything about fictional violence, they wont try to conduct real violence? Um, how about when they see cops accosting kids daily?

[jmdrake]

So if kids dont know anything about fictional violence, they wont try to conduct real violence? Um, how about when they see cops accosting kids daily?

Ya don't say?

[Occam's Banana]

Southern says the incident, in his opinion, amounts to a violation of the first amendment. He says the weapon shown is fictional as is the character holding it and that any implication his son would hurt anyone would be incorrect.

So the hell what? What if the weapon and the character were NOT fictional? What then?

Such inane quibbles only serve to suggest that incidents like this might otherwise have been acceptable ...

[VIDEODROME]

So if kids dont know anything about fictional violence, they wont try to conduct real violence? Um, how about when they see cops accosting kids daily?

I've wondered if fictional violence or even censorship makes it easier for a young person to be violent and use a weapon. What effect might there be if instances of violence were depicted say like Mr. Pink getting gut shot? It's no longer simply bang, shirt gets red stain, then the person stops moving.