How to win the war on the war on terror

[jmdrake]

Okay. It's obvious to everyone here that Rand and Ron Paul are 100% right on what caused ISIS and how to stop it. The problem is that boobus Americanus is looking for "Well what are you going to do" as opposed to long winded lectures on "What should we not have done that we did already." It's like this. You've got a patient dying of lung cancer. He's still smoking. Obviously he needs to quit smoking. But you know what he wants to hear from his doctor first? "Doc what are you going to do?" Patients need hope. People need hope. Sometimes hope comes from a placebo. Make people think you are doing something effective and, if it's a problem that will fix itself if you just stop smoking (or doing whatever unhealthy behavior you are doing), then maybe they'll stick with the program long enough for it to work.

Here's an example of Rand Paul not saying what he would actually do about ISIS.



Now to be fair, this was so early in the game that he couldn't talk about things like pressuring our allies to stop finding ISIS and ISIS related groups, not letting refugees in from countries that are breeding grounds for terrorism, or cooperating with Putin against ISIS. (I don't know if Rand said that last one, but he should.) Here are a few things Rand should have said in the above interview that would have been proactive. He eventually said one or more of these.

1) Arm the Kurds. Rand pointed out that the Shiites didn't stand and fight. But the Kurds did. (And Rand later stated "arm the Kurds")

2) Stop arming the rebels. Rand kind of said that in the interview but not forcefully enough.

3) End the policy of regime change in Syria and cooperate with the Assad regime against the insurgency. To my knowledge Rand hasn't said that. It's a gutsy move. But it's true. Assad isn't the problem in Syria. He's the solution.

Please post other proactive ideas in this thread. I think they should be compiled into a blog. The domain name StopISISNow.com is still available for $2.95. StopISIS.com is available as well...for $1,895.00. I think "StopISISNow.com" is good enough. StopTerrorism.com is taken but StopTerrorism.info is available. We do ourselves no good reaching republican voters with websites like "antiwar.com" or "noninterventionism.com." Folks need to hear what a liberty candidate will do about radical Islamic terrorism, not just what he won't do.

[TheNewYorker]

Make sure you register the domain anonymously, else ISIS can get your address.

[ILUVRP]

everyone learns in econ 101 --power is money -- , to defeat isis stop their money flow , we know where their oil fields ( that they took over ) in iraq and syria are at , just bomb the $hit out of them , if isis takes over more oil fields bomb them too .

[Peace&Freedom]

How about EndFalseFlags.com? That proposes a course of action Rand could take to expose the covert op manufactured threats that would work, but of course he will not pursue that option.

[thoughtomator]

The way to win the "War on Terror" is to stop making fear-based decisions and be rational instead.

If it were named properly it would be the "War of Terror", if it were understood properly the aim would be clear that the point of the "war" is to make you afraid and compliant so that you submit to tyranny.

The common sense solution to the problem of terrorism is to reduce the power of government and to reduce the number of Muslims, which are the two essential components in making terror attacks happen. Naturally, the elites want to do the exact opposite of that, increase the powers of government and import more Muslims.

[Ronin Truth]

If war is the rich man's terror, and terror is the poor man's war, then just give the poor men enough money to not be poor any longer.

[r3volution 3.0]

www.pornsexfreecreditreportcureforbaldness.com

...if you want to maximize traffic

[jmdrake]

www.pornsexfreecreditreportcureforbaldness.com

...if you want to maximize traffic

LOL. Well the nightly news gives us terrorporn.com.

[Cabal]

Don't make it to specific, for starters. Make it as general as possible while maintaining clear reference. So, right away, "StopTerrorism" is preferable to "StopISISNow." Alternatively, you could get both (and others) and just have it all redirect to the same domain.

[Cabal]

How about EndFalseFlags.com? That proposes a course of action Rand could take to expose the covert op manufactured threats that would work, but of course he will not pursue that option.

I wouldn't recommend this, personally. This makes it sound fringe and aligned with a conspiracy-theory narrative right out of the gate.

[Peace&Freedom]

I wouldn't recommend this, personally. This makes it sound fringe and aligned with a conspiracy-theory narrative right out of the gate.

Of course the MSM liars have made all references to the reality of covert ops "sound fringe." After all, the truth is 'out there.' But it's still the truth, and exposing it is still the real key to ending the war on terror.

42 FALSE FLAGS OFFICIALLY ADMITTED TO

[jmdrake]

everyone learns in econ 101 --power is money -- , to defeat isis stop their money flow , we know where their oil fields ( that they took over ) in iraq and syria are at , just bomb the $hit out of them , if isis takes over more oil fields bomb them too .

You know what? I proposed this in July 2015 and I was right. You proposed it again in December 2015 and you were right. If Rand had made something like this a centerpiece of his campaign he would be in the top running right now. The only caveat is that any strikes should have been done in coordination with the Assad regime in Syria and the Al Maliki regime in Iraq.