LOL, here is the fact-filled, substantive response from kahless in her neg rep to me for my comments in above post #60:
"up yours"
Fully consistent with the type of communication of her idol Tronald Dump
Brawndo's got what plants crave. Its got electrolytes.
H. L. Mencken said it best:
“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
Consider yourself lucky I made that much of effort to write that and this post for that matter to respond to your neg rep from earlier today. As usual I get them from you for simply having an opinion on candidates not just Trump.Originally Posted by francisco
Either you are a herd follower, a socket puppet or simply suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome. This since I have been posting opinions of candidates and their policies here since 07 without issue until recently.
* See my visitor message area for caveats related to my posting history here.
* Also, I have effectively retired from all social media including posting here and are basically opting out of anything to do with national politics or this country on federal or state level and rather focusing locally. I may stop by from time to time to discuss philosophy on a general level related to Libertarian schools of thought and application in the real world.
None of the above. It's just that I'm alternately irritated and appalled that someone would post, on this forum devoted to Liberty, a never-ending stream of fawning support for an abjectly authoritarian and statist candidate, namely Trump.
Meanwhile, you still haven't posted any evidence for your allegations you made in post #54, as I noted in post #60.
Brawndo's got what plants crave. Its got electrolytes.
H. L. Mencken said it best:
“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
I'm not. I'm supporting more freedom and less government. I agree with Ron Paul's prescription of doing nothing. Check the name of the site again.
I fail to see how either of them are any farther left than Trump is. I'm not talking about contradictions, I'm talking about his blatant, proven, unmitigated, pure far-left progressivism.
No need to weep. Just ask the follow-up question, "How?"
I guess his answer is something like, "Don't give them visas." But, of course, that doesn't actually mean someone can't come here and stay here. I don't think the government should give them or anyone else visas either.
I'm not in favor of open-borders, how many times do I have to say it? Trump's problem is that he's a liar, not that he's openly saying the wrong thing on this issue (though the way he is saying it is asinine). Initially I was somewhat receptive to Trump, but the more the guy spoke, the less he appealed to me. His support of bigger government, including government programs for health care, is a complete non-starter for me.
What good is kicking out all the brown people if you're going to continue expanding the thing that draws them here? I'm not happy about all these paupers from the 3rd world flooding in to sap up all our tax money, but I'm not in favor of turning this country into a police state in order to try and stop it.
That is simply not true. I am just not going march lock step in support of the tactics and playbook of the left and MSM that were responsible for destroying Ron's campaign. I also simply do not sign on to these ridiculous conspiracy theories that Trump is to the left of Sanders, wanting to kick out Brown people or is in the race to support Hillary Clinton.
^This crap never ends. Just wait until they use it against Rand when they bring up CRA. They will drive Rand out the race with his CRA comments just like they did with Ron and the newsletters. This happens because you give credibility to the left and the mainstream media when they use these tactics against other Republicans. Again, Rand IS running to win the Republican primary.
* See my visitor message area for caveats related to my posting history here.
* Also, I have effectively retired from all social media including posting here and are basically opting out of anything to do with national politics or this country on federal or state level and rather focusing locally. I may stop by from time to time to discuss philosophy on a general level related to Libertarian schools of thought and application in the real world.
I stand with Rand here. I have proved again that I am closer to the beliefs of Rand Paul than you open border clowns that attack me for supporting Rand, Trump, Sessions and others immigration policies. You are only promoting your own policies, not Rand's and by attacking me you are attacking Rand's policies.
You had that coming after this.
Originally Posted by francisco
Last edited by devil21; 11-27-2015 at 10:28 AM.
"Let it not be said that we did nothing."-Ron Paul
"We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM. They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality."- A Quote From Some Old Book
Nothing but sock puppets and Soro's think tank posters without one ounce of evidence I have promoted Trump. Keep deflecting to bury the posts where I have proven you clowns support Socialism, open borders and are directly attacking Rand's policies.
Again the few Rand supporters left in this forum that actually post Rand's polices continue to be attacked by the pack of pretenders. This while they promote their own Progressive agenda labeling it as Rands then hide it by accusing Paul supporters of working for someone.
* See my visitor message area for caveats related to my posting history here.
* Also, I have effectively retired from all social media including posting here and are basically opting out of anything to do with national politics or this country on federal or state level and rather focusing locally. I may stop by from time to time to discuss philosophy on a general level related to Libertarian schools of thought and application in the real world.
I think you win that prize for being far left and promoting that crap on this forum via open borders.
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
Devil, again, why are you after Kahless rather than those promoting open borders on this website? It makes no sense.
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
Trump is just a rude, haughty, turd head. He's the bully in the playground. His campaign is built on making fun of and demonizing certain people. How Republicans find that compelling...I just don't understand. But, then again, they loved Bush too.
By the way, I don't support "open borders", I support private property rights.
I stand with Rand here. I have proved again that I am closer to the beliefs of Rand Paul than you open border clowns that attack me for supporting Rand, Trump, Sessions and others immigration policies. You are only promoting your own policies, not Rand's and by attacking me you are attacking Rand's policies.
You had that coming after this.
It's true, we're not talking about kicking out either white or black people, save maybe a few Haitians or African Muslims. Again, I'm perfectly fine with mass deporting people that are either imported welfare brats or dangerous, or anyone else here illegally. The problem isn't race or anything else (I'm not a progressive, no matter how much you want me to be one), my problem is that Trump is a certified left-winger on several key economic and social issues. And again, the guy is a proven liar and flip-flopper.
If Rand is going to have problems, it will most likely be because a lot of Trump supporters gave ammo to the media by making asinine comments about how similar the two are on the issues. Trump needs to go down, end of story. If you can't handle that, you don't belong here.
You may get your wish only to find you are left with far worse.
For a no fly zone over Syria potentially risking WWIII with Russia.
Bush
Carson
Christie
Clinton
Fiorina
Graham
Kasich
Rubio
Hillary Clinton
Opposing
Rand
Trump (building of safe zone for refugees)
O'Malley
Sanders
* See my visitor message area for caveats related to my posting history here.
* Also, I have effectively retired from all social media including posting here and are basically opting out of anything to do with national politics or this country on federal or state level and rather focusing locally. I may stop by from time to time to discuss philosophy on a general level related to Libertarian schools of thought and application in the real world.
I can see it now, complete with a huge sign displaying his name in block letters. Yeah, Trump's not likely ever to want to get us into a war just so he can show off his manhood.
Try reading Ron Paul's prescription in Liberty Defined. I venture to say you will not agree with it. Not at all.
You support open borders. Stop lying.
Supporting private property rights in this case, would mean you would take responsibility for those you brought into this country, by keeping them on your private property and sponsoring them to ensure they were not a drain on anyone else. You would also be held accountable if they brought any diseases into this country or harmed anyone. As in if they did, you would be strung up. Are you good with that? Liberty means being responsible for your actions.
Last edited by LibertyEagle; 11-27-2015 at 01:04 PM.
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
I frankly don't see the problem. The mealy-mouthed weasel he's making fun of, deserved to be made fun of. Deserves more than that, actually. Good for Trump.
There is no bigger bully in America than the left wing Mainstream Media. Trump is not a bully, he is a hero. The only politician with the balls to take the MSM Machine head on and beat them at their own game. That is why people love Trump. They are sick and tired of pussies and cucks that let the MSM push them around and denigrate Middle America on a daily basis.
I have, and I do. It's precisely what I've been preaching here all this time.
Here's a good synopsis.
https://www.numbersusa.com/content/n...t-we-didnt-mak
Sorry, this fear-mongering isn't going to fly with me. The notion that I have to play nice with Trump or suffer the Neo-cons is the exact same crap that Romney supporters pulled when they told me that me voting for Johnson would insure another 4-years of Obama (as if their tactics during the primary had nothing to do with what happened). I'm not riding the Trump train, and I am not riding the Neo-con train either. The fact that Trump is so tight with the Clintons is a big part of why I'm not buying any of his rhetoric.
Trump = the left-wing mainstream media.
Why does having a physical disability like that make someone deserving of mockery?
I also think to much is being made of Trump's demeanor. I think most already know that he's a dick. Being a dick isn't necessarily a disqualifier to be the GOP nominee. But you know what? Being a protectionist ought to. Do you support Trump's economic policies which pretty much amount to modern day protectionism? Can such policies be defended??
LOL, attacking the messenger is the low road, attacking the message is much more important. I have no problem though with someone taking to task a person who is spreading misinformation, but do it with some dignity man. The guy constantly comes off as juvenile and a bit of an ass.
OK, well that contradicts your position that "nothing" should be done, and your contention that Ron Paul supposedly agrees that "nothing" should be done. Actually he takes a complex, nuanced position on immigration in his book, and he advocates that the government do several things that would not be strictly libertarian and which I'm sure you would not agree with, due to your arguing against them on this forum. Maybe when Ron Paul says it you agree with it, but when anyone else does they're a Nazi? I don't know.
"mealy-mouthed weasel"
Try reading! Thanks.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us