[Video] Rand Paul on Face the Nation w/ John Dickerson 9/20/15

[jct74]

update:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=3&v=e4jDJhpLUqQ


--

And days after the fireworks at the second Republican primary debate, we'll also sit down with Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, who's seeking the 2016 Republican presidential nomination. We'll ask him about his own campaign, the state of the GOP race, and how he hopes to break through the noise and emerge as a real contender.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sunday-hillary-clinton/

[Jan2017]

Campaign would do good to have a sit down interview, if it is filmed as advertised in the cbs link - rather than through the camera and mics during his weekday job on Capitol Hill.Probably taped on Saturday, shown on Sunday and assures Rand starts the week in the news cycle . . . good for upcoming polling certainly.

[Liberty74]

. . . good for upcoming polling certainly.

Currently polling doesn't mean anything. I thought Trump would have imploded by the end of September yet he still holds a pretty strong lead. Carson took a hit the other night while Carly will rise because the media has been pumping her for a month now. Also, in 2011 there were 21 debates before Iowa which allowed a lot of movements up and down candidates. This year, according to Rove in a WSJ article I read yesterday said that there are only 4 more debates this year and I think 3 debates in Feb. That's it.

So it might take a while longer before Trump implodes. Even Rove thinks he will. Time will tell but right now this ignorant voters like the school kid brat style attitude with an empty suit. Regardless, plenty of time before this race is truly settled. Ron was at 3% all the way through up until Dec and in Iowa he took the lead at 24%. And all hell broke lose within the establishment and fake conservative talk radio heads.

Breitbart is reporting a poll that shows Rand has the lowest favorable at 38%. Trump increased his lead. Carly increased and Carson is going down. Rubio went up a bit and everyone else is 6% or below.

[squirl22]

I personally do not think favorability/unfavorabililty mean anything.

[mello]

Is there a youtube yet?

[timosman]

Is there a youtube yet?

The broadcast is in the morning, few hours from now.

[liberty_nc]

favorable/unfavorable doesn't mean much, most people will pick their favorite and put unfavorable for the rest on telephone polls

[libertyplz]

Bump, Rand will be on soon

Also:

[libertyplz]

They give Hillary nearly 30 minutes and when it's on CBS for everyone, and Rand will be on last half the show when some cbs stations switch to a different program... of course I'm one of the "some" that is switching so I can't see Rands interview. Just switched to some random show that is no longer face the nation

[MarcusI]

Was Rand on yet?

[MarcusI]

If not, here is a working live-stream:

http://www.time4tv.com/2013/08/cbs.php (Stream 2)

(Careful, maybe ad-/malware included, no expert on that)

[Tunink]

He was on and was awesome but only got 8 minutes to Hillarys 30 minutes.

He hit her hard and sounded rational and concise on his stances, came across very presidential.

[libertyplz]

Was Rand on yet?

I assume so, sounded like Rand was going to be on at 11am est, right as some markets switched to a different show. My CBS station switched at that time, so I don't really know, hopefully someone will provide a tube soon. If not, I think the show is rebroadcasted on CBSN at 2 pm est

[Valli6]

And their dumbass panel didn't even mention Rand. Talked about hilliary, the republican debate, asked "is Trump almost over", said, "Walker is over" and proclaimed that Rubio is really wonderful.

[libertysource]

[squirl22]

Rand did a good job, great interview.

[klamath]

favorable/unfavorable doesn't mean much, most people will pick their favorite and put unfavorable for the rest on telephone polls

Actually it is one of the worst categories to be low in. It directly reflects that Rand won't be a second choice to a large percentage. It can change, as Trump turned it around but Rand is going in the wrong direction.

[Liberty74]

I personally do not think favorability/unfavorabililty mean anything.

Most certainly the favorable and unfavorables matters. It's extremely hard to win if your favorables aren't above 50% or if your unfavorables are higher than your favorables.

Remember, Ron had 50-60% favorables in Dec. of 2011 when he took the lead in Iowa. That scared the crap out of the establishment and the elites gave right wing talk radio their marching orders to go nuclear on Ron. Everyone of them DID just that and brought out that issue of Ron Paul's newsletter that someone else wrote in it. Ron's national favorables tanked to around 40% maybe a little less. After Iowa Ron was done because the media took him out, only a miracle could have saved his campaign.

[01000110]

Good job by Rand.

Why are his favorables so low? I certainly don't get it. I guess all the republicans being polled want someone who'll bomb Iran???

[klamath]

Good job by Rand.

Why are his favorables so low? I certainly don't get it. I guess all the republicans being polled want someone who'll bomb Iran???

In a nutshell.

[Batman]

I just don't know why Republicans are digging their heels in on the Muslims. This demographic tends to be libertarian on foreign policy and economics. They live in purple states. They pay attention to current events even if they stay away from the ballot box. Bush got their vote in 2000 and they never voted for the Republican nominee again. If this becomes an issue in 2016 they could break for Bernie or Hillary in blocs.

[klamath]

I just don't know why Republicans are digging their heels in on the Muslims. This demographic tends to be libertarian on foreign policy and economics. They live in purple states. They pay attention to current events even if they stay away from the ballot box. Bush got their vote in 2000 and they never voted for the Republican nominee again. If this becomes an issue in 2016 they could break for Bernie or Hillary in blocs.

Republicans don't want libertarian on foreign policy.

[acptulsa]

..

Four hours of Sunday morning blather, and only eight minutes of it made any sense at all.

[jonhowe]

Great interview! One of the best in some time. Share this around!

[Batman]

Republicans don't want libertarian on foreign policy.

Not even Rand, it seems.

[adam220891]

Unfavorable is weird. He's generally straight forward and doesn't come across as arrogant. Many policies are populist in nature, so why the hate?

[Sola_Fide]

Rand did great.

[nikcers]

You can tell he is in the zone if he can keep this energy up he will become an unstoppable force.

[klamath]

Not even Rand, it seems.

Rand tried to move toward the majority opinion on foreign policy and it didn't work. Pretty much every hawk republican know what most libertarians don't, Rand WILL govern more non interventionist than he campaigns.

[Batman]

Majority opinion is war but people are getting tired of it fast. If he's serious about building a coalition, he needs to unite people behind a message that resonates with all voter groups and that message is going to be anti-war pretty soon.