Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Former CIA Boss and 4-Star General: U.S. Should Arm Al Qaeda

  1. #1

    Former CIA Boss and 4-Star General: U.S. Should Arm Al Qaeda

    Sounds like a plan. Besides, what difference, at this point, does it make?

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-0...d-arm-al-qaeda

    Former CIA boss and 4-star general David Petraeus – who still (believe it or not) holds a lot of sway in Washington – suggests we should arm Al Qaeda to fight ISIS.

    He’s not alone …

    As we’ve previously shown, other mainstream American figures support arming Al Qaeda … and ISIS.

    The U.S. actually did knowingly support Al Qaeda in Libya. And also in Syria.

    And we actually ARE supporting ISIS to some extent.

    Truly, America’s foreign policy is insane.
    Based on the idea of natural rights, government secures those rights to the individual by strictly negative intervention, making justice costless and easy of access; and beyond that it does not go. The State, on the other hand, both in its genesis and by its primary intention, is purely anti-social. It is not based on the idea of natural rights, but on the idea that the individual has no rights except those that the State may provisionally grant him. It has always made justice costly and difficult of access, and has invariably held itself above justice and common morality whenever it could advantage itself by so doing.
    --Albert J. Nock



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    For many years, the (completely unremarkable) Nieuport-Delahaye 52 biplane was somewhat famous for having been built in another country (France) and having been used on both sides of a civil war (in Spain in the late thirties). But given our taste for arming both sides of civil wars, I'm sure that is becoming common with American warplanes--or will soon become common.

    And may God have mercy on our souls.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    You only want the freedoms that will undermine the nation and lead to the destruction of liberty.

  4. #3
    I don't see any downside. For the military contractors.
    The proper concern of society is the preservation of individual freedom; the proper concern of the individual is the harmony of society.

    "Who would be free, themselves must strike the blow." - Byron

    "Who overcomes by force, hath overcome but half his foe." - Milton

  5. #4
    seriously???? is that the only idea they can ever come up with???? arm these guys until they dont do what we want then declare them terrorists after they hurt people using weapons and training WE gave them.. circles circles circles.. mother$#@!.
    The ultimate minority is the individual. Protect the individual from Democracy and you will protect all groups of individuals
    Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual. - Thomas Jefferson
    I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

    - Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear

  6. #5
    I thought it was illegal or some $#@! to give money or weapons to our declared enemies or known terrorist organizations.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by specsaregood View Post
    I thought it was illegal or some $#@! to give money or weapons to our declared enemies or known terrorist organizations.
    It's also illegal or some $#@! for the government to take control of the press, disarm the populace, ensconce themselves in homes or cars seized under pretext of a war--like a war on drug dealers, conduct searches without either warrant or probable cause, force us to reveal our passwords so evidence against us may be gleaned from our devices, have the services of a jury not made partial by publicity or by having information on things like nullification withheld from them, be charged fees in connection with a criminal prosecution beyond reasonable and proper fines as proscribed, or project itself into matters that should be a matter for states, or for the consciences of individual citizens.

    Gave 'em an inch and look at their miles of dust!
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    You only want the freedoms that will undermine the nation and lead to the destruction of liberty.

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by specsaregood View Post
    I thought it was illegal or some $#@! to give money or weapons to our declared enemies or known terrorist organizations.
    We'll have to impose strong sanctions against ourselves for aiding terrorists. Maybe Lindsey Graham, Tom Cotton and Ted Cruz will lead the fight in the Senate for hardcore sanctions and strongly worded letters with threats.
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Pharma-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul

    Proponent of real science.
    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    It's also illegal or some $#@! for the government to take control of the press, disarm the populace, ensconce themselves in homes or cars seized under pretext of a war--like a war on drug dealers, conduct searches without either warrant or probable cause, force us to reveal our passwords so evidence against us may be gleaned from our devices, have the services of a jury not made partial by publicity or by having information on things like nullification withheld from them, be charged fees in connection with a criminal prosecution beyond reasonable and proper fines as proscribed, or project itself into matters that should be a matter for states, or for the consciences of individual citizens.

    Gave 'em an inch and look at their miles of dust!
    One does have to wonder though; if Al Qaeda was behind the WTC attacks why are the families of 911 victims and all the politicos and talking heads that can't wait to mention the 9/11 attacks at every chance not up in arms over this? Why is this idea not ridiculed and folks like the general in the OP not laughed out of town?



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by specsaregood View Post
    One does have to wonder though; if Al Qaeda was behind the WTC attacks why are the families of 911 victims and all the politicos and talking heads that can't wait to mention the 9/11 attacks at every chance not up in arms over this? Why is this idea not ridiculed and folks like the general in the OP not laughed out of town?
    What do you mean al Qaeda? That was ISIS, wasn't it? We haven't ever been at war with Eurasia! We have always been at war with Eastasia!

    Damn it, they airbrushed Beria out of the picture. Therefore, he never existed. Don't make us adjust your attitude.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    You only want the freedoms that will undermine the nation and lead to the destruction of liberty.

  12. #10
    Betray us.

    Name fits 'em

  13. #11
    Just drop a couple million guns over there, and a couple billion rounds of ammo. Don't give any other weapons. Bomb anyone entering or existing the area. Come back in 3 years, and clean up.

    Sounds like a plan!

  14. #12

  15. #13
    Don’tworry, according to Dr. Baltar (and his inner Six), they only need the nuclear warhead to be used as part of their Cylon detector…

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucille View Post
    Sounds like a plan. Besides, what difference, at this point, does it make?

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-0...d-arm-al-qaeda
    We did that, and see where we got us? We armed ISIS, see where we got us? This guy must be living 12 years in the past. the U.S. has armed all the "alleged" terrorist groups. We even armed the drug cartels in Mexico via "Fast and Furious". Anyone else need arms? Just let the U.S. Feds know and we'll deliver in exchange for a few million in our personal bank accounts. Our meaning, Holder, Obama; et al.

  17. #15



Similar Threads

  1. Lt. General Hamid Gul on Alex Jones: CIA Run Al-Qaeda
    By Warlord in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-14-2013, 02:05 PM
  2. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 09-05-2011, 10:31 AM
  3. General Betray-us links Iran to Al Qaeda
    By sofia in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-17-2010, 05:32 PM
  4. Top cop: Talk to al-Qaeda boss
    By Liberty Star in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-10-2008, 08:20 AM
  5. four-star general says McCain doesnt understand IRAQ
    By dirtyp in forum Other Presidential Candidates
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-03-2008, 03:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •