Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Two time loser jumping in? Will Romney save the day for Hillary?

  1. #1

    Two time loser jumping in? Will Romney save the day for Hillary?

    Nice, Romney the Clown lost to John McCain. I can't think of anything much worse. Then of course we know what happened when he was the nominee. Is he going to join the race to save the day for Hillary to give her an easy win?

    http://observer.com/2015/08/will-mitt-romney-jump-in/

    As Jeb Bush struggles to carry the establishment mantle, some wonder whether the time is right for Mitt Read more at http://observer.com/2015/08/will-mit...#ixzz3kRotIxoS Follow us: @observer on Twitter | Observer on Facebook Read more at: http://tr.im/MgH4D

    There is on the edge of the spectrum a thought awakening that former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who ran for President in 2008 and 2012, might get back in the race. It comes naturally to think so. Before the race got seriously underway Mr. Romney met with Jeb Bush to consider their fates. Mr. Romney’s wife Ann went so far back then as to suggest on Cavuto that If Jeb ran, Mitt would stay out, as they both represented a similar center of establishment principles and would appeal to the same donor base. This past week, three of Mr. Bush’s key advisors have slipped away as Mr. Trump has made unprecedented advances in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, the three states, as former Governor of Texas Rick Perry has said recently, where the race to 2016 is to be won. As Mr. Trump rises, and the Real Clear Politics current average has him ahead of the pack in New Hampshire at 28.3 percent, he rises at the expense of Mr. Bush, who is at nine percent in the same poll. So as the “establishment” candidate, Mr. Bush, is suddenly being viewed as circling the drain, the frantic call goes out to Mr. Romney to enter and save the day. But Mr. Romney is not now and has never been exactly an “Eastern Establishment” candidate, to which Jeb Bush and his famous political family form and fulfill the archetype. He brings a somewhat different political ethic and conservative moral base to the Republican party, in my opinion, a heightened, seasoned and more mature sensibility and Republicans should be delighted to have him. For it is the current conservative standard that is killing Jeb; a standard advanced to the apogee of provincial incompetence by brother W., sure to be fully outlined in Dick Cheney’s new book, “Exceptional: Why the world needs a powerful America.” Mr. Romney is not now and has never been exactly an “Eastern Establishment” candidate, to which Jeb Bush and his famous political family form and fulfill the archetype. The rise of Mr. Trump brings a full repudiation of the Republican standard since the rise of the Brothers Bush. The provincialism and political cultism of this era withheld support for two runs to the presidency by Mr. Romney. While establishment conservatives were being exceptional to one another, Mr. Romney advanced by hook or by crook at a cost to himself of a rather large fortune. What a contrast to the day of Dwight Eisenhower and the post war conservatives. Mr. Eisenhower considered Romney patriarch, his father George Romney, Governor of Michigan, to be among the rare few qualified to seek the Presidency. READ Waiting for Mitt Romney: The Fixer Could Tame FIFA (and Maybe the U.S.) That current standard now wants the high-minded Mr. Romney to sally forth and save the day against what New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd calls “the Good Son” is touching, but it is not enough. Too much water under the bridge from the Not-So-Good Son, and his peripatetic sidekick in the big cowboy hat, who never fired a shot in anger except that time he shot of his 78-year old quail-hunting partner in Texas, Mr. Cheney. They will not get Mr. Romney now. Because Mr. Romney actually is “exceptional.” And it is quite unlikely after this summer that Mr. Romney could unseat Mr. Trump anyway. Mr. Trump, like Bob Dylan or Sarah Palin, is a full-bore cultural phenomenon. They appear every sixty years or so and change everything. They shatter the orthodoxies of the establishment when it is high time that they find change. Republicans actually have the advantage and the jump on the century that this metamorphosis occurs first in their camp, although it is beginning to spread to the Democrats who have pressed Howard Schultz, chairman and CEO of Starbucks, to join the Democratic primary. Maybe the third time is the charm for Mitt Romney (Getty) Maybe the third time is the charm for Mitt Romney (Getty) The new form is already taking shape and reformulating what it means to be a conservative. Mr. Trump aside, the first debate brought two new players into the limelight – neither of them politicians – from what might be called “the new normal”; surgeon Ben Carson and especially former chief of Hewlett-Packard Carly Fiorina. Her performance in the debate was exceptional. She is a rising star in America today. Unlike the crass and proudly provincial “exceptional” model of Mr. Cheney and W. Bush which time and history are rapidly leaving behind, she is urbane, tough, smart and worldly wise. She is possibly the most interesting candidate to enter national politics today since Mitt Romney joined the run for POTUS in 2008. If Mr. Romney suddenly entered today simply to defend the declining Bush dynasty against the rising New York dynamism of Mr. Trump, it would shatter the creative awakening that is happening to conservatism and paralyze the rise to positive influence of Mr. Carson and Ms. Fiorina. It is simply not in Mr. Romney’s character to do that. Mr. Romney praised Ms. Fiorina’s talent early on. He even saw the potential of a Presidential ticket with two women in 2016; Ms. Fiorina and New Hampshire Senator Kelly Ayotte. Visionary. Surely President Fiorina should call up Mr. Romney in 2017 to be her first chief of staff, to institutionalize a new political ethic in the rising chronicles of conservatism, possibly even one which could to run the century. Read more at http://observer.com/2015/08/will-mit...#ixzz3kRp0OCih Follow us: @observer on Twitter | Observer on Facebook Read more at: http://tr.im/MgH4D



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Mitt is not going to run. Most of his people are attached to other campaigns.

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by CPUd View Post
    Mitt is not going to run. Most of his people are attached to other campaigns.
    Fundraisers don't stay attached.

    They jump ship to the candidate who will both do what they want and have the best chance of winning.

    For most of the establishment/neocons, they would have no problem jumping from Bush to Romney in a second.

    Funny though, remember how 2016 was supposed to bring out all the "strong candidates" the GOP had to offer? Well that sure hasn't happened.
    The enemy of my enemy may be worse than my enemy.

    I do not suffer from Trump Rearrangement Syndrome. Sorry if that triggers you.

  5. #4
    Jesus Christ not this again...I don't believe I could take the nerve wracking, once again.

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Jesus Christ not this again...I don't believe I could take the nerve wracking, once again.
    Yeah, no chit. Romney is the GOP spoiler, not that we really have a GOP but if we did.... he's the spoiler.

  7. #6
    I thought somebody had left the door open at the Twilight Zone when Trump began surging, but I think I may have been sucked into it if Mittens actually decides to run again.

  8. #7
    Its pretty clear that the news media and elites are the ones deciding the American election your vote and votes wont even matter.

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by AngryCanadian View Post
    Its pretty clear that the news media and elites are the ones deciding the American election your vote and votes wont even matter.
    It's kind of like that one 2014 study conducted by Princeton and Northwestern University that concluded that the U.S. government does not represent the majority of American citizens. Instead, the study found that the government is ruled by the rich and powerful, or the so-called “economic elite.” Moreover, the researchers concluded that policies enacted by this governmental elite nearly always favor special interests and lobbying groups. It doesn't really take an Astrophysicist to figure this one out.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    The Bush/RNC faction sat Mitt down early this year and told him he would not be allowed to run this year. If the RNC sees Bush as dead in the water, they may hit the panic button and try to bring in Romney. It's kind of like the situation in the DNC with Clinton and Biden.

  12. #10
    All four of his supporters were pretty excited at mittromneycentralchat tonight.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul View Post
    The intellectual battle for liberty can appear to be a lonely one at times. However, the numbers are not as important as the principles that we hold. Leonard Read always taught that "it's not a numbers game, but an ideological game." That's why it's important to continue to provide a principled philosophy as to what the role of government ought to be, despite the numbers that stare us in the face.
    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    This intellectually stimulating conversation is the reason I keep coming here.

  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by CPUd View Post
    Mitt is not going to run. Most of his people are attached to other campaigns.
    14 of those campaigns are stooge RNC campaigns. If RNC dumps Jeb for Romney, many of them will migrate from the stooges to Romney. More so when the stooges fall out entirely.

  14. #12
    the more the better. only helps Rand

  15. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by cindy25 View Post
    the more the better. only helps Rand
    We shall see, i am doubtful at this point.

  16. #14
    I have to admit though, it would be awesome to see him get in, lose the primary states but have his supporters get elected RNC delegates bound to Rand on the first ballot, all the while Team Rand uses the rules that Team Mitt forced through in 2012 to repeal and replace those delegates with Rand supporters.

  17. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Suzanimal View Post
    All four of his supporters were pretty excited at mittromneycentralchat tonight.
    Damn, I still remember going to some chat there, and being kicked off in like 5 minutes for asking a pretty decent not even super critical question. Can't remember what it was, couldn't care less about the place.
    "I am a bird"

  18. #16
    Jan2017
    Member

    He was listed in that Breitbart polling I noticed . . .



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Jan2017
    Member

    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Jesus Christ not this again...I don't believe I could take the nerve wracking, once again.
    Oh, it would be fun . . . lots of walking on water between these three neocons / morons -



    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...1b0_story.html

  21. #18
    Romney is a dumbass!



Similar Threads

  1. Hillary Clinton 2016 would be a big loser in Obama-AIPAC fight
    By enhanced_deficit in forum 2016 Presidential Election: GOP & Dem
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-04-2015, 12:21 PM
  2. Tuesday's Biggest 'Loser' Is Hillary Clinton
    By Brian4Liberty in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-05-2014, 10:05 PM
  3. Romney goes to bat for Utah loser Bob Bennett
    By sofia in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-09-2010, 11:32 AM
  4. Loser Romney is beating us
    By LibertyBrews in forum Maryland
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-13-2008, 12:12 AM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-10-2008, 11:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •