Trump has supported nearly all of Obama's economic policy agenda

[TaftFan]

Auto bailouts? Check.
Bank bailouts? Check.
Stimulus package? Check.
Government-run healthcare? Check.
Progressive taxation? Check.
Hands off unfunded liabilities? Check.

http://www.redstate.com/diary/southe...policy-agenda/

[hells_unicorn]

Nearly? Try the whole 9 yards.

[Brett85]

Fantastic article. +Rep. Spread this far and wide!

[LibertyEagle]

People don't care.

They see the alternative being another frickin' Bush or Hillary. Who would all continue Obama's crappy economic plan and likely make it even worse. So, it basically makes it a non-issue.

But, contrary to them, Trump is talking about renegotiating our rotten trade deals and doing something to curb the illegal alien invasion of our country. That puts him in positive territory.

I want Rand to be up there in the position that Trump is. I hope and pray that he can get there.

[Brett85]

People don't care.

They see the alternative being another frickin' Bush or Hillary. Who would all continue Obama's crappy economic plan and likely make it even worse. So, it basically makes it a non-issue.

According to the article that TaftFan wrote, (and numerous other sources) Trump is far more liberal on economic issues than even Jeb Bush. So it certainly does matter. People need to wake up.

[Sola_Fide]

People don't care.

They see the alternative being another frickin' Bush or Hillary. Who would all continue Obama's crappy economic plan and likely make it even worse. So, it basically makes it a non-issue.

But, contrary to them, Trump is talking about renegotiating our rotten trade deals and doing something to curb the illegal alien invasion of our country. That puts him in positive territory.

I want Rand to be up there in the position that Trump is. I hope and pray that he can get there.

Negotiate trade deals? What do you think ridiculously high tariffs are going to do to the market of everyday things that everyone buys? This is supposed to be an answer to our economic woes?

[LibertyEagle]

According to the article that TaftFan wrote, (and numerous other sources) Trump is far more liberal on economic issues than even Jeb Bush. So it certainly does matter. People need to wake up.

Are you advocating for Bush or Hillary?

[William Tell]

Are you advocating for Bush or Hillary?

[fr33]

Are you advocating for Bush or Hillary?

Are you not advocating for both?

[LibertyEagle]

Yeah well, it sounds like it.

According to the article that TaftFan wrote, (and numerous other sources) Trump is far more liberal on economic issues than even Jeb Bush. So it certainly does matter. People need to wake up.

Here's the deal, folks. I want Rand to get the nomination. But, something is going to happen soon in our favor, or he is going to start being left out of debates. What then? Perhaps you choose to vote for whatever nutty libertarian the LP will be running; who doesn't have a chance in hell. I'd rather just not vote if those are my choices.

[hells_unicorn]

People don't care.

They see the alternative being another frickin' Bush or Hillary. Who would all continue Obama's crappy economic plan and likely make it even worse. So, it basically makes it a non-issue.

But, contrary to them, Trump is talking about renegotiating our rotten trade deals and doing something to curb the illegal alien invasion of our country. That puts him in positive territory.

I want Rand to be up there in the position that Trump is. I hope and pray that he can get there.

The assertion is correct, people don't care. The next step is figuring out how to fix that, and I'd argue complementing Trump on being a good liar (he ain't doing squat about the invasion of the Aztec gangs) is not the way to go about it. Sooner or later somebody has to put their foot down and call BS on this cult of celebrity nonsense., and that begins with telling some really gullible people what they don't want to hear.

[LibertyEagle]

Are you not advocating for both?

I think the problem is that you must have skipped your Reading classes.

Listen very closely. Rand has TWO PERCENT. If that doesn't improve, we are going to either get someone like Bush or Trump as the R nominee. In that scenario, I prefer Trump. Note that I didn't say I thought he would be some fab President, because I know he wouldn't. He's definitely a big government guy. But, I already know for sure what Bush would be supporting and no thanks.

[LibertyEagle]

The assertion is correct, people don't care. The next step is figuring out how to fix that, and I'd argue complementing Trump on being a good liar (he ain't doing squat about the invasion of the Aztec gangs) is not the way to go about it. Sooner or later somebody has to put their foot down and call BS on this cult of celebrity nonsense., and that begins with telling some really gullible people what they don't want to hear.

Maybe. But, what usually happens to the person bearing the bad news is not that they jump into the lead. Because they have been focused on bringing that person down, instead of putting forth their own message. But, it would help whomever is next in line.

[Sola_Fide]

Yeah well, it sounds like it.




Here's the deal, folks. I want Rand to get the nomination. But, something is going to happen soon in our favor, or he is going to start being left out of debates. What then? Perhaps you choose to vote for whatever nutty libertarian the LP will be running; who doesn't have a chance in hell. I'd rather just not vote if those are my choices.

Well, I agree with that. I won't vote either.

[hells_unicorn]

Maybe. But, what usually happens to the person bearing the bad news is not that they jump into the lead. Because they have been focused on bringing that person down, instead of putting forth their own message. But, it would help whomever is next in line.

Nobody is getting any kind of message out with Trump sucking up all the oxygen. Personally, I'd prefer it if Bush or Walker tries to take Trump down and either 2 or all 3 of them end up destroying each other in the process, but we should probably be hitting Trump while simultaneously getting Rand's message out. Contrasts need to be drawn before choices are made.

[GunnyFreedom]

People don't care.

They see the alternative being another frickin' Bush or Hillary. Who would all continue Obama's crappy economic plan and likely make it even worse. So, it basically makes it a non-issue.

But, contrary to them, Trump is talking about renegotiating our rotten trade deals and doing something to curb the illegal alien invasion of our country. That puts him in positive territory.

I want Rand to be up there in the position that Trump is. I hope and pray that he can get there.

So what you are saying is that it may be true that he totally supports Obama's economic policies right down the line, but it doesn't matter because he talks good?

[GunnyFreedom]

Are you advocating for Bush or Hillary?

So if you don't like Trump you must support HillaBush? Really? Isn't that the exact same illogical BS they spammed at us for supporting Ron Paul? We didn't like McCain so we must support Obama? Seriously?

[LibertyEagle]

So what you are saying is that it may be true that he totally supports Obama's economic policies right down the line, but it doesn't matter because he talks good?

So if you don't like Trump you must support HillaBush? Really? Isn't that the exact same illogical BS they spammed at us for supporting Ron Paul? We didn't like McCain so we must support Obama? Seriously?

You really should read the posts better.

[GunnyFreedom]

You really should read the posts better.

I read just fine, thanks. I am allergic to hypocrisy is all. Ahhchoo.

[LibertyEagle]

I read just fine, thanks. I am allergic to hypocrisy is all. Ahhchoo.

No ya don't. But, go ahead and pontificate some more, Gunny.

[GunnyFreedom]

No ya don't. But, go ahead and pontificate some more, Gunny.

You just keep telling yourself that sweet cheeks, I am sure it will help you sleep at night. And remember, you've brought every last bit of this on yourself. Think about that the next time you decide to attack people for refusing to support a progressive liberal wearing a Republican mask.

[LibertyEagle]

You just keep telling yourself that sweet cheeks, I am sure it will help you sleep at night. And remember, you've brought every last bit of this on yourself. Think about that the next time you decide to attack people for refusing to support a progressive liberal wearing a Republican mask.

I never suggested you, or anyone else, support anyone but Rand.

I don't know what's with you. Is this where you get your rocks off and feel like a big man twisting other people's stance?

Big fish. Little pond. Enjoy.

[cindy25]

Auto bailouts? Check.
Bank bailouts? Check.
Stimulus package? Check.
Government-run healthcare? Check.
Progressive taxation? Check.
Hands off unfunded liabilities? Check.

http://www.redstate.com/diary/southe...policy-agenda/

same would apply for Dole, McCain, ROMNEY

[GunnyFreedom]

I never suggested you, or anyone else, support anyone but Rand.

I don't know what's with you. Is this where you get your rocks off and feel like a big man twisting other people's stance?

Big fish. Little pond. Enjoy.

I'm sorry, I can't hear you over all your panty-bunching and sexual perversion accusations. All that malignant narcissism you've been spewing at people lately must be getting in the way of your critical introspection capacity. You just can't fathom that all of this is your doing can you? Lil miss n'er do wrong. Smdh

[LibertyEagle]

same would apply for Dole, McCain, ROMNEY

Yeah, unfortunately, and most of the candidates running this time too. The only one who believes totally different than that is Rand.

[Origanalist]

You really should read the posts better.

I read them the same way.

[LibertyEagle]

I'm sorry, I can't hear you over all your panty-bunching and sexual perversion accusations. All that malignant narcissism you've been spewing at people lately must be getting in the way of your critical introspection capacity. You just can't fathom that all of this is your doing can you? Lil miss n'er do wrong. Smdh

Excuse me, you must have me confused with someone who gives a rat's ass what you think of me.

[LibertyEagle]

I read them the same way.

Can't help ya then. I said it as clearly as I could. If you and Gunny want to read something else into it, go right ahead.

[Origanalist]

Are you advocating for Bush or Hillary?

Why would you ask Brett85 if he was advocating for Bush or Hillary?

[GunnyFreedom]

Excuse me, you must have me confused with someone who gives a rat's ass what you think of me.

It must be hard to walk carrying around all of that self-centered pride.