John Stossel ranks Rand the highest

[TheNewYorker]

http://reason.com/archives/2015/08/2...ial-candidates

My list of best to worst possible presidents:

Rand Paul (R)
Gary Johnson (Libertarian)
Carly Fiorina (R)
Jeb Bush (R)
Ted Cruz (R)
Scott Walker (R)
Rick Perry (R)
Marco Rubio (R)
John Kasich (R)
Ben Carson (R)
Bobby Jindal (R)
Jim Webb (D)
George Pataki (R)
Donald Trump (R)
Lawrence Lessig (D)
Chris Christie (R)
Martin O'Malley (D)
Lindsey Graham (R)
Lincoln Chafee (D)
Rick Santorum (R)
Jim Gilmore (R)
Bernie Sanders (Ind./D/socialist)
Joe Biden (D)
Hillary Clinton (D)
Mike Huckabee (R)
Jill Stein (Green)

[dannno]

lol...

Hillary Clinton (D)
Mike Huckabee (R)

[trey4sports]

Why is fiorina so high?

[puppetmaster]

Weird list

[cindy25]

why is Jeb so high?

[Keith and stuff]

Why is fiorina so high?

Good question. I am not sure which candidate is the best speaker on the list. Both Carly and Ted are so close in that category.

[luctor-et-emergo]

It's hard to see what standard he uses to rank people.

He got number one right.

[EBounding]

It's hard to see what standard he uses to rank people.

He got number one right.

[65fastback2+2]

It's hard to see what standard he uses to rank people.

He got number one right.

pick #1 and then throw darts at a board for the rest that dont matter

[hells_unicorn]

Why is fiorina so high?

I think Stossel doesn't see the whole NSA data-mining thing as being as big of a deal as Rand does, and that may play into him not minding Fiorina's Fascist talk about policing the internet. It's a stupid position to hold, but like everybody else, Stossel isn't perfect.

[jllundqu]

http://reason.com/archives/2015/08/2...ial-candidates

The fact that Stossel has Rand Paul and Jeb Bush in the same top 5 is all I need to know about Stossel's 'credentials'

[Brian4Liberty]

Why is fiorina so high?

Probably because Stossel is so high.

[Brian4Liberty]

[adam220891]

Jill Stein truly is terrible. Watch her YouTube videos if you want a taste.

[PCKY]

It's hard to see what standard he uses to rank people.

He got number one right.

Here's his breakdown:
But basically, I rank presidential candidates on how much they want to micro-manage our lives, or involve us in dubious foreign wars. Those who recognize the harm done by state control and government overreach gain points.
One candidate got bonus points just for not being politically correct (you know which one).