Should Trump supporters be banned from this forum?

[phill4paul]

That was never the issue with you. You would make innuendos about Rand, not backed by facts and when that was pointed out to you, you would just run off and post the very same thing in another thread. You did this CONSTANTLY.

Asking a real question that you really wanted answered was never the question. That was also told you many, many times.

Annnnd, panty buncher is back picking on her usual targets. Life must be a laugh riot in your household.

[LibertyEagle]

Annnnd, panty buncher is back picking on her usual targets. Life must be a laugh riot in your household.

I was responding to a post, Phill. Sorry if that twists your panties.

[heavenlyboy34]

This is a divide and conquer tactic. But it's more than that. This whole thing is a smokescreen to cover the fact that this economy has been micromismanaged to death.

It is.

The xenophobes undoubtedly approve. But please, God, somebody tell Rand Paul that the vast majority of the people recently turning xenophobic just want jobs, and the reason they don't have them isn't because of this ten or twenty or even thirty million--otherwise known as three or four or five percent of the people within these borders. Hate to quote Slick Willie, but the fact is, 'It's the economy, stupid!' And the way to trump this distraction is to say flat out that Rand Paul will give us the freedom to fix this economy, and fix it so well that we'll be begging for immigrants again before we know it.

I'd love to believe this, but AF and others have documented in many ways that the majority of American people don't really want freedom. They want bread, circuses, and saaaaaafety.

[cajuncocoa]

That was never the issue with you. You would make innuendos about Rand, not backed by facts and when that was pointed out to you, you would just run off and post the very same thing in another thread. You did this CONSTANTLY. And a great deal of the time, you were doing it in RAND's own subforum.

Asking a real question that you really wanted answered was never the question. That was also told you many, many times.

You realize you're in the minority opinion (possibly of one) here, don't you? And now you're just making stuff up to cover your ass. Most people who contacted/repped me after I posted this recognized the hypocrisy.

[phill4paul]

I was responding to a post, Phill. Sorry if that twists your panties.

Don't twist. Don't bunch. I don't wear panties. See you a week form now when you come to bitch and moan again.

[LibertyEagle]

You realize you're in the minority opinion (possibly of one) here, don't you? And now you're just making stuff up to cover your ass. Most people who contacted/repped me after I posted this recognized the hypocrisy.

Oh, I'm sure your fan club did. I got plenty of +reps when I called you out back then when you were doing it. You stopped when Bryan bought the forums and stopped you posting your crap in Rand's subforum.

[cajuncocoa]

Oh, I'm sure your fan club did. I got plenty of +reps when I called you out back then when you were doing it. You stopped when Bryan bought the forums and stopped you posting your crap in Rand's subforum.

At least I have a fan club. And Bryan didn't stop me. I stopped myself when I decided that, in spite of not being all that I wanted him to be, I would settle for what Rand is. You're still lying about what I did though. I complained when Rand said something that was out-of-tune with my idea of a liberty position.

When are you going to do something similar to all the Trump supporters running around this place? When are you going to give them the same treatment you gave me? Let's talk about what you're not doing.

[phill4paul]

It's taken me awhile but I've decided on "Yes." Just a temp ban.

[phill4paul]

Oh, I'm sure your fan club did. I got plenty of +reps when I called you out back then when you were doing it. You stopped when Bryan bought the forums and stopped you posting your crap in Rand's subforum.

Your panties are in a bunch because her fan club is bigger than your fan club. Despite all the sock puppets your fan club owns.

[LibertyEagle]

Your panties are in a bunch because her fan club is bigger than your fan club. Despite all the sock puppets your fan club owns.

You have confused me with someone who gives a crap.

[heavenlyboy34]

Quite the forum drama we've got going on in here, I see!

[phill4paul]

You have confused me with someone who gives a crap.

Your the one that comes here to post when your panties get in a bunch. I post fairly often. Sometimes on things not even related to other posters or their comments.

[LibertyEagle]

When are you going to do something similar to all the Trump supporters running around this place? When are you going to give them the same treatment you gave me? Let's talk about what you're not doing.

I haven't seen many posting in Rand's subforum. That was what you did.

[LibertyEagle]

Your the one that comes here to post when your panties get in a bunch. I post fairly often. Sometimes on things not even related to other posters or their comments.

When my name is called out, I will respond. Sorry if you hate it.

[acptulsa]

Quite the forum drama we've got going on in here, I see!

Still can't match that silly-assed soap opera about Donald and Megyn and when Rupert is going to find out Megyn's pregnant and whether Carly is going to realize it's Donald's baby, though.

[cajuncocoa]

I haven't seen many posting in Rand's subforum. That was what you did.

But while grassroots organizers are trying to get things going for Rand on this board (not just in his own sub forum) with less than 6 months to go to the Iowa caucuses, you sit on your hands while RPF members use this board to openly support a candidate running in opposition to Rand. You see no hypocrisy in that, huh? Like I said, you may be in a minority of one (leaving out the Trump supporters, of course.)

[LibertyEagle]

But while grassroots organizers are trying to get things going for Rand on this board (not just in his own sub forum) with less than 6 months to go to the Iowa caucuses, you sit on your hands while RPF members use this board to openly support a candidate running in opposition to Rand. You see no hypocrisy in that, huh? Like I said, you may be in a minority of one (leaving out the Trump supporters, of course.)

Is that how you make your posts, Cajun? You find out which way the popular wind is blowing and post accordingly?

I don't care if I am in the minority, or the only one, who does or says something.

[cajuncocoa]

Is that how you make your posts, Cajun? You find out which way the popular wind is blowing and post accordingly?

I don't care if I am in the minority, or the only one, who does or says something.

No, LE. It just turns out that way because I'm usually right and people like me.

Now, are you going to address the hypocrisy, or are you going to just keep deflecting the issue?

[acptulsa]

No, LE. It just turns out that way because I'm usually right and people like me.

And people like you because you're always willing to entertain the possibility that you're wrong, and when you finally figure out that you are you're perfectly willing to admit it.

Among other things.

[Barrex]

You are all stupid.


Could you help with promotion of money-bomb? Even 15 minutes will matter.

[JK/SEA]

btw...i'm switching from gin to vodka this week...

[LibertyEagle]

No, LE. It just turns out that way because I'm usually right

Because you agree with the mob. Congrats.

and people like me.

Now, are you going to address the hypocrisy, or are you going to just keep deflecting the issue?

There isn't anything hypocritical in what I did. When there is, I would be happy to address it.

You posted most of your Rand hate in Rand's subforum ad nauseum. The vast majority of the Trump posts have been outside of Rand's subforum. Get the difference?

[rg17]

The Trump supporters are getting worse and worse by day!

[David Sadler]

I voted Yes. I think anything against group think is bad! All none Rand supporters should be banned. This is a forum dedicated to the maintenance of Paul Inc

I join in solidarity with those who think this is a forum dedicated to continuing to restore and grow a liberty movement - not a family dynasty.

[wizardwatson]

I join in solidarity with those who think this is a forum dedicated to continuing to restore and grow a liberty movement - not a family dynasty.

It's about credibility, not nepotism.

Keep practicing.

[acptulsa]

It's about credibility, not nepotism.

And if he personally ever had any, he certainly spent it all. Both Donny and Davey.

[Sola_Fide]

I join in solidarity with those who think this is a forum dedicated to continuing to restore and grow a liberty movement - not a family dynasty.

Then you should leave, because you are a complete statist and don't promote liberty at all.

[Rad]

Then you should leave, because you are a complete statist and don't promote liberty at all.

Do you want me to leave? :O

[r3volution 3.0]

btw...i'm switching from gin to vodka this week...

Boooo

[enhanced_deficit]

Interesting results.