Prevent Megyn Kelly From Hosting Any Further REPUBLICAN Debates.

[timosman]

42,981 supporters

https://www.change.org/p/news-corp-r...blican-debates

Megyn Kelly characterizes the Presidential selection process as "fun", dismissing the millions of Americans that find it much more serious. We deserve better than Megyn Kelly. Below, please find a list of reasons we believe Megyn Kelly should be barred from all future debates:

Megyn Kelly had a clear agenda: attack Donald Trump. Even if she “attacked equally”, we’re not looking for a hatchet-man; we’re looking for a moderator to thoroughly, and fairly, vet the Presidential candidates.
With over 90 million Americans out of the labor force, they are more concerned with their future than whether or not someone engaged in name calling.
She tenaciously covered (to the point of voyeuristic obsession) Mr. Trumps past rather than his vision for the future.
Megyn Kelly's feeling, however valid, should come second to the interest of our Nation.
She focused on candidates personally, rather than politically.
Megyn Kelly failed to cover many things more relevant to a Presidential candidate. For example, Marco Rubio’s gang of eight bill, Jeb Bush’s fascination with common core and feckless immigration policy, Rand Paul’s specific position on constitutional issues, Ted Cruz's track record of telling the truth on everything he's ever done, politically, Ben Carson's honest, calm and collected "outsider" approach (mixed with his questionable second amendment stance), etc.
Ultimately, neither she nor Fox News lived up the "fair and balanced" standard: were it not for closing statements, the American people may have viewed an entire debate without understanding a single issue for which the candidates stand.

While her disdain for Mr. Trump was evident, this petition is a call for truly fair and balanced coverage of all candidates. Therefore, and as evidenced by her clear bias and poor performance, Megyn Kelly should be barred from hosting or moderating all future Republican Presidential debates.

[Brian4Liberty]

Isn't it kind of short-sighted to blame this entirely on Megyn Kelly? I am a long time critic of her biased, attack dog act, but everyone should know that she doesn't control the agenda. She happily goes along with it, but it's not her choice alone. Far from it.

And it's interesting that the obvious agenda was to attack both Trump and Rand, but people only care about Trump.

[cajuncocoa]

LOL...I'm pretty sure FoxNews isn't going to be persuaded by an online petition.

[jj-]

She happily goes along with it, but it's not her choice alone. Far from it.

So what?

She should still be attacked for being a willing participant.

You think only the bigger orchestrators should be attacked? One doesn't exclude the other. Your view is incomprehensible. So many people here seem asleep.

[jj-]

LOL...I'm pretty sure FoxNews isn't going to be persuaded by an online petition.

I'm pretty sure a drop in ratings from conservative viewers will hurt her very much.

[Brian4Liberty]

So what?

She should still be attacked for being a willing participant.

You think only the bigger orchestrators should be attacked? One doesn't exclude the other. Your view is incomprehensible. So many people here seem asleep.

Did I say that she should be free and clear? Your reading comprehension needs some work.

[heavenlyboy34]

C'mon! Faux Nooz stupidity is the only interesting thing about the debates! We even get funny memes from them.

[Smitty]

The wench needs a job in the kitchen of a Cracker Barrel makin' sausage gravy.

[cajuncocoa]

I'm pretty sure a drop in ratings from conservative viewers will hurt her very much.

If I were going to boycott or petition them, it would have been over their treatment of Ron, not Trump.

[jj-]

If I were going to boycott or petition them, it would have been over their treatment of Ron, not Trump.

I'm just saying it could hurt her ratings even if Fox news doesn't cancel the program. To your point, when someone is guilty, I don't care who punishes them, although I know many don't have that view.

[staerker]

So what?

She should still be attacked for being a willing participant.

You think only the bigger orchestrators should be attacked? One doesn't exclude the other. Your view is incomprehensible. So many people here seem asleep.

Kind of like how Trump was a willing participant in bribery?

[kahless]

A few hours later.

Sounds like Ailes trying to stop the Megyn Kelly thing from spiraling out of control any further.

[dannno]

[Danke]

Change.org? Really?

[wizardwatson]

Did I say that she should be free and clear? Your reading comprehension needs some work.

The wench needs a job in the kitchen of a Cracker Barrel makin' sausage gravy.

I'm torn between Megyn "the Fox News anchor" that I hate, and Megyn "the attack dog moderator that made the Donald and all his supporters whine" that I love.

[timosman]

A few hours later.

Sounds like Ailes trying to stop the Megyn Kelly thing from spiraling out of control any further.

[timosman]

Change.org? Really?

The government has the answers to all our problems. We just need to vote harder.

[Ronin Truth]

Step 1 - Buy enough Fox stock for a controlling interest.

[Dianne]

Step 1 - Buy enough Fox stock for a controlling interest.

The Saudi's beat us to that.

[heavenlyboy34]

Step 1 - Buy enough Fox stock for a controlling interest.

OP should start a chipin or kickstarter or something...

[wizardwatson]

Holy cow, the Megyn Kelly Facebook page has nothing since debate prep posts, but the 13,000 comments on that last post appear to be 99% whining on behalf of Trump.

Of course I had to convey my appreciation for her treatment of Trump, it seemed only fair.

In the course of finding her Facebook page though I came to know some disturbing facts:

Her kids names are Edward, Thatcher, and Yardley.

Yuck! I'm going to assume these were all her husbands picks. I like thinking about her in a positive light.

[notsure]

I don't know what y'all are talking about. Besides the fact that Rand wasn't given as much time as the other candidates and got skipped questions, it was a pretty good debate. Moderators were about equally tough on all the candidates. I think Rand may have even gotten some softball questions, compared to the other candidates.

[heavenlyboy34]

I don't know what y'all are talking about. Besides the fact that Rand wasn't given as much time as the other candidates and got skipped questions, it was a pretty good debate. Moderators were about equally tough on all the candidates. I think Rand may have even gotten some softball questions, compared to the other candidates.

You have awful low standards for what a "good" debate is, then.

[notsure]

A few hours later.

Sounds like Ailes trying to stop the Megyn Kelly thing from spiraling out of control any further.

Trump is whining too much. He looks desperate reaching for straws like that. If he can't handle a few tough questions in the primary, how is he going to be able to take on Hillary in the general. This man is a loser.

[notsure]

You have awful low standards for what a "good" debate is, then.

Well, why was it a bad debate? I actually appreciated the moderators grilling the candidates like they did.

[notsure]

I'm just saying it could hurt her ratings even if Fox news doesn't cancel the program. To your point, when someone is guilty, I don't care who punishes them, although I know many don't have that view.

How has Megyn Kelly ever mistreated or been unfair to Paul?

[EBounding]

Trump is whining too much. He looks desperate reaching for straws like that. If he can't handle a few tough questions in the primary, how is he going to be able to take on Hillary in the general. This man is a loser.

It just shows how tuff he is and can't be bought.

[wizardwatson]

Trump is whining too much. He looks desperate reaching for straws like that. If he can't handle a few tough questions in the primary, how is he going to be able to take on Hillary in the general. This man is a loser.

I know, right.

And he's even bragging on twitter how he tattle-taled on Megyn to her boss. Most guys who feel the need to project power are cowards to begin with. Over-compensation is a trait of those that lack real potency.

What's even more hilarious to me is watching all of Trump's supporters whine right along with him.

From: "Finally someone with some balls!"

To: "Not fair Megyn, you aren't being nice! Waaaaaaaaaaaah."

Priceless.

[wizardwatson]

Here's how a man handles bitches trying to front



Eat your heart out whiney Trumpnicks

[Carlybee]

It just shows how tuff he is and can't be bought.

That's because he's the buy-ER not the buy-EE.