Promises, promises.Originally Posted by BenMuldowney
How ever will we get along without the most nervous person in the whole room screaming that everyone else is a 'nellie'?
you will do just fine... sitting there in defeat clinging to a future that never comes, listening to judas goats that laugh at you behind closed doors.
You bet. And all just so we can look at the likes of you later, and say, 'When it was not yet too late and everyone with actual cojones was fighting, what were you up to?
oh.. i'll be there.... i just wont be part of the group that clings to stupid strategies. if the gop commits fraud this time around... ill do what i did last time and call them out in the middle of the room and not care if they send the sgt at arms to me twice.
Uh huh.oh.. i'll be there.... i just wont be part of the group that clings to stupid strategies. if the gop commits fraud this time around... ill do what i did last time and call them out in the middle of the room and not care if they send the sgt at arms to me twice.
If we're all just a bunch of thumb-sitters, why do you spend so many hours of every day coming here and telling us we've lost and we might as well sit on our thumbs? Why don't you go to a gamer forum and tell them they should play games, or an anime forum and tell them they should watch anime, or a model railroad forum and tell them they should build little trains? It makes just as much sense.
Rand has no choice. It's a kamikaze attack, quite frankly.
Oh, you think that only white people like liberty and people of a different colour are authoritarian. Got it.
Well, good. Now that he has killed himself in your mind, you can stop wasting your time here and go the $#@! away.
I'm glad you finally achieved closure. If you have. If you keep intruding upon our denial, even though our horse is presumably dead, however, we will know you're scared of the Zombie Apocalypse. Or you are scared Rand isn't as dead as you obviously want him to be.
ive been here 2 days in recent yrs and you translate that to every day? and i got involved in the 2012 election. and before that did a ton of other related work since 2006.
Big stupid miscalculation by Rand and his 'advisers'. Why don't they get that these are the disenfranchised voters they should be going after? If anything, Rand should echo Trump's general positions in the campaign and dish them out in a polished way. People want the TRUTH and are tired of PC nonsense. This is the anger Trump is tapping into, and with Rand attacking Trump, makes himself look like an establishment insider. Total losing strategy! Rand was honestly standing up there on stage defending the REPUBLICAN leadership (eg.. the healthcare interruption). Rand is chipping away at his own anti-establishment brand, and it is a sad sight to see.
Let's see. Rand Paul was a fool to attack, a fool not to attack, he had no choice but to attack but attacking did him in, he should go back to the substance that his father used to win us over, he should stop confusing idiot voters with substance, he should jump, he should not jump, and mostly we should all just give up and go away. In fact, everyone has given up on us and just gone away, except that here they all still are.
I think we got the message already. Repeating it isn't going to cause us to stop smelling the bull$#@! within it.
^This exactly.
I think people also all too well remember the blatant miscalculations from Ron's 2012 campaign and after seeing this it sure does not instill confidence for the campaign to make the right decisions going forward.
* See my visitor message area for caveats related to my posting history here.
* Also, I have effectively retired from all social media including posting here and are basically opting out of anything to do with national politics or this country on federal or state level and rather focusing locally. I may stop by from time to time to discuss philosophy on a general level related to Libertarian schools of thought and application in the real world.
No one is saying NOT to attack. Attack the ESTABLISHMENT. Look who's the talk of the town recently. Trump, Ted F'n Cruz, Fiorina. Do you notice a link? They're ALL attacking the status quo and their policies. Goodness, some of you really have your blinders on.
Trump is anti-establishment, but he gets 24/7 coverage even though we all know that true anti-establishment candidates Must Not Be Named? Fiorina is attacking someone? Trump is launching substantive attacks--attacking Kelly instead of Murdoch, attacking Clinton without ever having mentioned state secrets or Benghazi (the two areas where she is most vulnerable)?
Who has blinders on again?
Rand should have created a controversy with his mouth. If you want to create media attention, that's how you do it.
Just what I'd expect from someone who has admitted he wants Rand to lose, the establishment to win, and the nation to then burn to the ground.
I agree with the premise of your post but Fiorina popularity is purely news media - Foxnews creation. Over the last year the most blatant promotion of a 0 polling candidate I have ever seen in my life time beside her history of failure.
* See my visitor message area for caveats related to my posting history here.
* Also, I have effectively retired from all social media including posting here and are basically opting out of anything to do with national politics or this country on federal or state level and rather focusing locally. I may stop by from time to time to discuss philosophy on a general level related to Libertarian schools of thought and application in the real world.
You're lamenting that Trump stole all the media exposure, but you never wanted to ask 'Why?' I'm telling you why. He doesn't care about focus groups or polls. Then he double downed on the statements after being nationally crucified.
It is the 'perception' of being anti-establishment. This is the GOP crowd we are talking about, they don't do substantive. Rand sounds like a milquetoast Republican with a cute slogan of 'different kind of republican'. I'm reporting from the ground here, this is how people perceive it. Of course, all of us here are wise to it, but just go ask your average GOPer what he thinks. This is the crowd Rand wants and sold out the libertarian base for, isn't it?
I never wanted Rand to lose. If I did, I would have never contributed to his campaign. Rand has done that by his lonesome.
i know how the different demographics vote in this country. this isnt rocket science.
GREAT POSTS!!!!
wow.. some people are getting it.. THANK GOD!
Yet you and the same 'minorities that you detest' suffer from the same syndrome.
so recognizing how different ethnicities, genders and age groups vote is a syndrome? and now i detest minorities because i see how they are used by the media/progressives? you are an ^%&^$#... do not type to me again.
Like your hero Donald Trump, I do not care. So here is a question that I want to know, why has not any conservative candidate attemping to build bridges with minorities groups. I mean not all African-American supports gay marrige and Asian-Americans are starting to get annoyed with racial quotas.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us