American commentator drops the F-bomb on "Zionist colonizers"

[enhanced_deficit]

Leading American writer Susan Abulhawa is denied entry to Palestine

Annie Robbins on July 30, 2015
Susan Abulhawa, the renowned Palestinian American novelist and political commentator, was denied entry to Palestine at the Allenby Bridge yesterday. Her wrath is on full display: “Denied entry to my homeland by a bunch of $#@!ing Zionist colonizers who didn’t think I was sufficiently deferential. Livid.”


Related

Palestinian infant burned to death in West Bank; IDF blames 'Jewish terror'
Jul. 31, 2015

[HankRicther12]

Personally I have no dog in the fight on the whole Israel/Palestine thing other than the fact that I hate Americans feel we need to be involved in it - but I find it funny that Jews tend to lean very liberal in America and promote all this Marxism and it's odd they work so hard to tear down Traditional White Christian America yet the traditionalists are the only one's who support their state.

All of these 3rd world immigrants they work so hard to import are mostly sympathetic to Palestine or are Muslim. I'm not one of the Jewspiracy types, but for those who are I mean I sorta get the strategy of using Marxism to tear down traditional western society, but it's kind of ironic that the only ally Jews have is traditional western society and the people they are using to destroy the West hate them. Almost seems like they are creating a Frankenstein monster.

[enhanced_deficit]

Personally I have no dog in the fight on the whole Israel/Palestine thing other than the fact that I hate Americans feel we need to be involved in it ..

If you were impacted by WTC1/2/7 events, Iraqi Freedom, TSA gropes, Barack Hussein Obama, gay wedding cakes etc, you do have a dog in the fight.

If you pay taxes, you have dog in the fight.

[HankRicther12]

If you were impacted by WTC1/2/7 events, Iraqi Freedom, TSA gropes, Barack Hussein Obama, gay wedding cakes etc, you do have a dog in the fight.

If you pay taxes, you have dog in the fight.

Which is why I said this "other than the fact that I hate Americans feel we need to be involved in it" I was merely trying to keep my post from becoming a discussion about who is right or wrong in the conflict, others can debate that, I of course am furious that my tax dollars and are used to intervene and that I get a bullseye put on my head simply for being an American due to my govts actions.

[enhanced_deficit]

Understood , I should have been more clear that this was not about right/wrong debate as you pointed out, but about financial sponsorship of foreign interventions and then facing the results.

[Christopher A. Brown]

Understood , I should have been more clear that this was not about right/wrong debate as you pointed out, but about financial sponsorship of foreign interventions and then facing the results.

Another good reason Americans need to involve themselves with the long overdue, lawful and peaceful revolution. Partisan politics are no functional. They are designed to divide and cause dysfunction and disable American from controlling America.

The lawful and peaceful revolution is about putting the states back in control through an Article V convention that is properly done by the states citizens controlling states. Only citizens can define constitutional intent.

[cindy25]

everyone should read her book, Mornings in Jenin

[unknown]

Oh dayam. Tell us how you really feel.

Also, shes cute. Amirite?

[enhanced_deficit]

Thank you for thought provoking responses.

[timosman]

Also, shes cute. Amirite?

Anything wrong with being cute ?

[DevilsAdvocate]

You know, I've never understood the objection to "colonizers". Doesn't it make sense that the dominant, more powerful cultures would expand to displace weaker cultures?

If the Romans never expanded, all of Europe might still be dominated by savage tribes. If the Europeans never expanded into America, the entire American continent might still be a dark savage place.

The testing ground for whether or not your civilization is better, is the battle field. The side that has the stronger technology, the stronger economy, the best tactical minds...etc will succeed and sweep aside the weaker culture. So for example, Germany would easily sweep aside the primitive headhunting societies in Africa. And that's just the normal, natural course of the world. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with being a "colonizer".

[timosman]

You know, I've never understood the objection to "colonizers". Doesn't it make sense that the dominant, more powerful cultures would expand to displace weaker cultures?

If the Romans never expanded, all of Europe might still be dominated by savage tribes. If the Europeans never expanded into America, the entire American continent might still be a dark savage place.

The testing ground for whether or not your civilization is better, is the battle field. The side that has the stronger technology, the stronger economy, the best tactical minds...etc will succeed and sweep aside the weaker culture. So for example, Germany would easily sweep aside the primitive headhunting societies in Africa. And that's just the normal, natural course of the world. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with being a "colonizer".

Being a military colonizer prevents you from claiming the higher moral ground. The battlefield these days is your mind and the weapon of choice is propaganda.

[enhanced_deficit]

In the mean time, in Washington DC:
(caution, many flags photos)


Inside a CUFI Summit: Christian Zionists dance the hora and prepare for end times in Washington DC
July 31, 2015

• Just some of the thousands of US and Israeli flags at the 2014 CUFI Summit
  
  http://mondoweiss.net/2015/07/christ....W5aEuqmt.dpuf

White House Sidesteps Request To 'Condemn The Apartheid State Of Israel'

The Huffington Post
Posted: 07/28/2015 12:17 PM EDT
WASHINGTON --

A petition submitted last year on the White House's "We the People"
platform requested that the U.S. government recognize “that without our
American tax dollars Israel could not conduct such criminal acts against
the civilian population of Palestine."


In its response, the White House sidestepped the main issue raised
by the petitioners and focused instead on criticizing the lack of
progress being made towards an agreement to establish an independent
Palestinian state.
The White House’s response to the petition comes ahead of the U.N. General Assembly in September, where there is speculation that France or another member country may present a resolution on Palestinian statehood.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0224d8833d581

You know, I've never understood the objection to "colonizers". Doesn't it make sense that the dominant, more powerful cultures would expand to displace weaker cultures?

Could it be some folks are not happy when their families are "colonized" by powerful cultures in following ways?

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q...hildren+images






What makes a culture more "powerful" , military might or more refined/superior outlook on life? A question for you, was Nazi culture of 1920s more powerful or Israeli culture of 1990s (pre 9/11)?

Does US currently have a powerful culture?