Originally Posted by
hells_unicorn
What if I told you that disseminating false views of prophecy, even when done unintentionally, gives God's enemies cause to blaspheme and hinders the progress of the church? And does a person who habitually takes the Lord's name in vain by holding to such views really love God?
True enough, I hope someone else in this thread heeds these words.
Fanaticism has a definition, and it applies to the ravings that I responded to earlier. People that have no control over their zeal and begin spouting nonsensical word salads about signs and symbolism with little doctrinal basis aren't bringing glory to God. Furthermore, your objection regarding complacency is perfectly fitted for Pre-trib. fanatics who think they can be swooped up by simply regurgitating scripture by rote and behaving as they choose. This is not my position, and if you thought it was, you may want to do some hard thinking about who is blind here.
Wizardwatson doesn't think that Paul was a valid apostle, so your admonishments are woefully misdirected here. And this isn't about being 100 percent correct, this is about accepting or rejecting the teachings of a 19th century Heresiarch who helped perpetuate the sort of antinomian lawlessness that you are seeing unfold in American Christianity.
Wizzy just predicted the fulfillment of the entire Prophecy of Revelation in the near future based on news headlines, so admittedly he made a massive error and yet you see fit to defend him. If he's wrong about this and somebody does something stupid or dangerous based on a lie, there will be consequences.
When you've read as much church history as I have and you've seen all of the similar parallels that were drawn to similar past events in anticipation of judgment day, you tend to take stuff like this with a massive grain of salt. This sort of irrational anticipation and careless speculation about providence is exactly what led to the birth of all the American cults (Mormonism, Jehova's Witness, ect.) that have been leading the unregenerate astray. I feel perfectly safe in treating all of the stuff you've cited with a healthy degree of skepticism, and in no way shape or form does my lack of frantic anticipation of the end affect my zeal for the Christian faith, quite the opposite actually.
I won't be shocked by it, nor will I be shocked by them being marked by the consequences of their deviations from orthodoxy (Matthew 5:19). Seeking after what is sufficient is the beginning, but not the end of faith, and those who come to know that they have erred are bound to correct their thoughts and actions in accordance with repentance unto life. Knowing all of the damage that has come to the Christian Faith within the past 200 years with the rise of Premillennialism, I can not in good conscience openly condone it being taught, nor shrink away when challenged on the proper constitution of the Christian faith, as noted by Paul in Ephesians 2:19-22, as a church fitly framed and growing together, and one that does not seek after private interpretations of prophecy (1 Peter 11:20).
I think I've stated my piece on this matter, and will bow out of further discussion as things are beginning to veer a little off-topic.
Connect With Us