Why is there so many Bernie Sanders Supporters on Youtube
Is it just me or is they're already so many Sanders supporters on Youtube, Especially Comments. Will it effect Rand Paul in the Election or is it too early. Hope Rand Paul wins the election!
What do you think on this?
Bernie Sanders has an attractive message:
"Rich people hate you; let's take their stuff."
Any more questions?
"And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works." - Bastiat
"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." - Voltaire
There are so many Bernie Sanders supporters because we live in a nation of idiots.
It's not just that. They don't like Hillary. I keep trying to tell you all. She has not worn well. She is tired, dated, and elitist. She's a money wh*re and a criminal. She should be in jail.
#NashvilleStrong
“I’m a doctor. That’s a baby.”~~~Dr. Manny Sethi
TPTB realize that Hillary is imploding so they're offering up Sanders on the left to be the Ron Paul of 2008 but hope that these progressives will gravitate back toward her if the likes of Rand gets the GOP nomination and then the media unleash their fury against him. Just a guess.
How many ya figure?
You all realize that exact same thing can and has been said about Ron and Rand Paul supporters who find them just as batty and idiotic as you all find Sanders supporters, right?
The number of youtube commenters does not translate to voters. If it did, then Ron Paul would be president. Most people in the US and elsewhere do not make comments on youtube.
Ron - maybe, but not Rand. Rand is a man with balls and a plan.Originally Posted by Mr.NoSmile
It's good that they aren't supporting Hillary.
"He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
"dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc
"You don't need a medical degree to spot obvious bullshit, that's actually a separate skill." -Scott Adams
"When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those 'different' from you, not those responsible [controllers]" -Q
"Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul
"Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."
Bernie Sanders is the left's Ron Paul.
All the things the establishment candidates are not.
He is all in on anthropogenic climate change, but he makes good points sometimes:
Makes you think where was Rand when Bernie was asking these questions ?
Sanders is a fraud. I post this far and wide. In what might have otherwise been his greatest legislative moment on behalf of the working class, he instead chose to completely screw the 99% on behalf of his banker overlords with his watered down audit the Fed amendment in May, 2011. This is a completely telling and defining moment. Sanders should be laughed out of every event that is staged for him.
like it or not, it will have an effect. Bill Maher compared Sanders to Ron on his show this week. Sanders will take independent young voters in NH. the promise of free college will get votes.
so, you all are saying Sanders bad and Rand good? Why would Bill Mahr compare Sanders to Ron?
42
Correct , he is a commie and so are the majority of americans .
+rep
He wasn't making a straight up comparison, he was essentially saying that Ron was able to inspire and get a lot of youth vote when he ran even though the age difference of the candidate and the supporters was wide. Maher remarked that he is seeing something similar happening with Sanders in terms of rally numbers growing beyond capacity of the event locations and the ages of the supporters Sanders is attracting.
I watched the interview, Sander's main key talking points was on global warming and free education/health care for all. He railed against the 1% and called for a redistribution of wealth, and used those words specifically. He said he was against TPP because of the loss of jobs of previous trade agreements like NAFTA/CAFTA and says the Saudis should deal with ISIS instead of us getting involved. He blamed the wars of Iraq and Afghanistan on the Republicans ignoring the fact that the Dems were right there voting for the wars as well.Talks about how those wars were not paid for and added to the debt, but again not being specific as to how his own programs he proposes will be paid for. He might have also said something about ponies I'm not sure.
Last edited by orenbus; 06-21-2015 at 01:20 AM.
It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds. -Samuel Adams
It's a nation of entitled, pampered cowards who want something for nothing. The only freedom they want is freedom from responsibility. What else would you expect?
Money for nothing, chicks for free.
Bernie Sanders voters should be top targets for Rand in the event of a matchup with HRC. 2 out of 3 of them will be persuadable, and HRC can't afford to lose those votes.
He is a fake "anti Establishment" candidate, stealing votes from Rand.
Just like Elizabeth Warren ?
...specifically by keeping the many antiwar Democrats from switching registration (where necessary) at primary time and helping us win the GOP nomination.
And if you and anaconda were wrong about him being a fake 'anti-establishment' choice, then he'd be getting as little attention from the media as Martin O'Malley. He is not.
Last edited by acptulsa; 06-21-2015 at 07:29 AM.
Yep.
OMG! If he gets the Brownie vote, we are sunkHe wasn't making a straight up comparison, he was essentially saying that Ron was able to inspire and get a lot of youth vote when he ran even though the age difference of the candidate and the supporters was wide. Maher remarked that he is seeing something similar happening with Sanders in terms of rally numbers growing beyond capacity of the event locations and the ages of the supporters Sanders is attracting.
I watched the interview, Sander's main key talking points was on global warming and free education/health care for all. He railed against the 1% and called for a redistribution of wealth, and used those words specifically. He said he was against TPP because of the loss of jobs of previous trade agreements like NAFTA/CAFTA and says the Saudis should deal with ISIS instead of us getting involved. He blamed the wars of Iraq and Afghanistan on the Republicans ignoring the fact that the Dems were right there voting for the wars as well.
Consider just reading the comment posters names. I think you find there are a lot less of them than you think.
What's probably happening is how we did it. Someone sees an article or a new tube or Ron/Rand is on some news program captures it and puts it on youtube and someone sees it and runs back here and says go comment n this one.
OTOH: there are TV ads out here that basically say: Let us build your business a FREE Facebook site! If you like it, we will maintain it for a low monthly free, including posting good comments on your page and driving traffic to it.... Jus saying...
-t
Lets get the elephant in the room out of the way, Bernie is the most anti-war candidate running for any party, and I'm sure the age demographic of individuals who comment on youtube is such that being anti-war weighs high on their political decision making process. I'd think it is also true that the same demographic also favors leftist economic policies.
SC being number 3 is going to shape every GOP candidates platform.
-t
It really depends, are they vying for the SC vote, or the vote of youtube commentors, or even just being themselves. The combination of anti-war and socialist policies make Bernie a little tougher to dethrone from the social media darling, even Ron may not have had as much a presence had the left had an anti-war candidate in their primary.
Sanders is in this race for one reason and one reason only: If the serious anti-war vote were to coalesce, it could win the GOP primaries for Rand Paul. Sanders is there to split the serious anti-war vote between the two parties' primaries, period.
It was almost to the point where the complete lack of an anti-war Democrat was going to make a lot of Blue Republicans. But now Democrats have their very own peacenik loser, so they can vote for peace and lose without ever having having to do something as distasteful as associate with those leftover Dubya voters they love to hate. And, yes, they are just shallow enough to consider voting for a different candidate in the same primary as 'associating with'. And just stupid enough not to see it as 'defeating those zombies once and for all'.
And they will not feel guilty about the thousands of brown babies who will then die in Hillary's next war, even though they really could have prevented it.
And no, lurking progs, this is not just as sound an argument for us supporting that clown Sanders. Only so many of us peace lovers will vote in the primaries, and the GOP vote is far, far more fractured than the Democratic Party vote. We can put Rand Paul over the top, working together. Sanders couldn't beat Clinton with a ten foot pole.
Last edited by acptulsa; 06-21-2015 at 12:44 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us