Just my thoughts. This was a question in an article. It seems everytime there is a murder, one group wants to call another a terrorist, thug, mentally ill, and the other tries to explain why it wasn't. As if charging someone with murder wasn't enough. But that's a different topic...
I've noticed that the media seems to have an agenda based on the race or ethnicity of murderers.
1. If the murderer is brown and named Mohammed, obviously he is a terrorist and we need people with uniforms and guns* to invade 10 countries overseas, strip search you at airports and listen to your phone calls.
2. If the murderer is has African heritage, obviously he is a thug and we need more people with uniforms and guns* with more power to subjugate constitutional rights so a hoard of them don't over run your gated communities.
3. If the murderer is white, obviously he is mentally ill and we need to check up on people's mental stability with people with uniforms and guns* and disarm the supposed free people of this country and drug them.
It's become a very noticeable pattern to me. The media seems ignores crimes committed that go against this formula.
*Throughout history these people with uniform and weapons have a history of committing worse crimes.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us