Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: USDA Gives $3.8 Million in Grants to Develop and Promote Nanotech in Food

  1. #1

    USDA Gives $3.8 Million in Grants to Develop and Promote Nanotech in Food

    Nanotech is increasingly being pursued for use directly in the food we eat, rather than just in the packaging.

    According to Popular Mechanics: “The most commonly used nanoparticle in foods is titanium dioxide. It’s used to make foods such as yogurt and coconut flakes look as white as possible, provide opacity to other food colorings, and prevent ingredients from caking up. Nanotech isn’t just about aesthetics, however. The biggest potential use for this method involves improving the nutritional value of foods.

    “Nano additives can enhance or prevent the absorption of certain nutrients. In an email interview with Popular Mechanics, Jonathan Brown, a research fellow at the University of Minnesota, says this method could be used to make mayonnaise less fattening by replacing fat molecules with water droplets.”

    There has been a 1000% increase in nanotech used for food since 2008 and is now being deployed by major companies including Kraft, General Mills, Hershey, Nestle, Mars, Unilever, Smucker’s and Albertsons.


    What are the real implications of this? There’s one thing for sure; the element of power is a very necessary thing to consider. With all technology like this, monopolization and hierarchical structures are a potential problem. The USDA and other health oversight agencies have a long track record of approving controversial practices used in our food that later turn out to have deadly health and environmental impacts. Understanding the current players in the agro-tech business including Monsanto and Syngenta, you can see how this could end badly.

    The implications of this are significant for the future of Agorism, sustainable food, independent agricultural business, monopolization of food, the health of the people consuming this food, and much more.

    No one is saying that nanotech in food is inherently bad, but with the history of the organizations funding this technology, people are naturally suspicious. More research is needed and concerns must be addressed before nanotech in our food becomes our next big mistake.


    Continued - USDA Gives $3.8 Million in Grants to Develop and Promote Nanotech in Food



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Oh brother. Get government out of our food supply and their crony friends.
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    Oh brother. Get government out of our food supply and their crony friends.
    To develop and promote...

  5. #4
    Monsanto is Running the USDA: Two GMO Crops Approved This Year
    While other nations ban GMOs'



    by Christina Sarich | InfoWars | May 29, 2015

    In case it didn’t make it to your news table, the United States Department of Agriculture (headed by Tom Vilsack, Monsanto’s best buddy) has recently (in January) approved two more Monsanto-owned genetically modified crops – new strains of both GM corn and soy. Is it any question now who is running our government in the US? Monsanto is calling the shots, not the people who vote for Congress and Senate members.

    “Today [January], the U.S. Department of Agriculture approved the sale and planting of Monsanto’s genetically engineered dicamba-tolerant soybeans and cotton. This approval follows that of 2,4-D tolerant soybeans and corn, billed as the next generation of herbicide-tolerant crops to tackle glyphosate (Roundup)-resistant weeds. Dicamba-tolerant soy and cotton are simply the latest example of USDA’s allegiance to the biotechnology industry and dependence upon chemical solutions. This continues the disturbing trend of more herbicide-tolerant crop approvals taking place under President Obama’s watch.”

    Food & Water Watch Executive Director Wenonah Hauter declared in a press statement that the green light is:

    “simply the latest example of USDA’s allegiance to the biotechnology industry and dependence upon chemical solutions. This continues the disturbing trend of more herbicide-tolerant crop approvals taking place under President Obama’s watch.”

    Should we be surprised though, when the main man heading the Department of Ag is a member of one of the biggest biotechnology industry groups, the Biotechnology Industry Organization, who once named Vilsack Governor of the Year? Vilsack is also the founder and former chair of the Governor’s Biotechnology Partnership. So more GMO crop approval – of course!

    Continued..
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-21-2014, 12:37 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-16-2013, 11:38 AM
  3. USDA advertizes 'free food' in foreign countries
    By BAllen in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-18-2013, 07:58 AM
  4. 10 States That Rely The Most On Food Stamps: USDA
    By Anti Federalist in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 05-15-2011, 09:08 PM
  5. USDA: Food Prices to Increase 3.5%
    By bobbyw24 in forum Economy & Markets
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-27-2011, 09:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •