Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The Latest Argument Against Apple's New Encryption: It's for Perverts

  1. #1

    The Latest Argument Against Apple's New Encryption: It's for Perverts

    American government officials' renewed war on encryption just got a little zanier.

    After more than six months of complaints, we know US government officials, including the FBI director, President Barack Obama, as well as the head of the NSA, are not happy about Apple’s decision to turn encryption on by default on its new iPhone operating system, which makes it technically impossible for Apple to access the data the request of the police.

    We also know that, in practice, they’re asking for impossible solutions, using fear mongering and hyperbolic statements such as “encryption threatens to lead us all to a very dark place,” or simply misleading or wrong examples to support their arguments.

    But a Massachusetts prosecutor, who is scheduled to testify at a House hearing on encryption on Wednesday, is taking the arguments a step further into bizarre territory.

    If encryption becomes widespread, according to Daniel Conley, the Suffolk County District Attorney in Massachusetts, perverts that take surreptitious pictures of women’s intimate parts on public transportation—also known as “upskirting”—will never be prosecuted.

    If the offender’s phone can’t be searched pursuant to a warrant, then the evidence won’t be recovered and this practice will become absolutely un-chargeable as a criminal offense,” Conley, who is also a board member of the National District Attorneys Association, will tell the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, according to the written testimony he submitted ahead of the hearing.

    Conley, however, doesn’t mention that the pictures might be in the pervert's cloud storage (phones sometimes have cloud backups turned on by default), which would potentially put them at the reach of police forces. He also doesn't explain how often his district prosecutes these types of cases.

    But this is far from the only questionable claim in Conley’s written testimony, however.

    The prosecutor also said that if phone encryption had been widespread at the time of the Boston bombings, history might have played out differently.

    With widespread encryption, “the apprehension of those responsible for the Boston Marathon bombings would have been very much in doubt.”

    “Were law enforcement blocked from obtaining [phone] evidence, or if other companies were allowed to make their own determinations as to what video or other evidence law enforcement was and was not permitted to see,” Conley argues, “the apprehension of those responsible for the Boston Marathon bombings would have been very much in doubt.”

    The truth, however, is far from Conley’s speculation.

    In fact, Dzhokar Tsarnaev did use encryption. He used it on his computer, but the technology was exactly the same: it made it harder for anyone to access the data stored on his laptop.

    Yet investigators were able to get in because, as it turns out, Tsarnaev was bad at passwords—just like the rest of us. The one he chose to encrypt and (in theory) lock down his computer was “AllahuAkbar1”—an easy one to crack—according to a digital forensics consultant who testified at Tsarnaev’s trial on Tuesday.
    "let them search you,touch you,violate your Rights,just don't be a dick!"~ cdc482
    "For Wales. Why Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world. But for Wales?"
    All my life I've been at the mercy of men just following orders... Never again!~Erik Lehnsherr
    There's nothing wrong with stopping people randomly, especially near bars, restaurants etc.~Velho

  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    I didn't even start using a lock code until it was keyed to a backdoorless encryption scheme. All this foofaraw is doing is letting me know that Apple was not lying about their new encryption standards.

  4. #3
    Pictures are forever.A gentleman only puts mirrors on the toes of his shoes.
    Inspired by US Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, this site is dedicated to facilitating grassroots initiatives that aim to restore a sovereign limited constitutional Republic based on the rule of law, states' rights and individual rights. We seek to enshrine the original intent of our Founders to foster respect for private property, seek justice, provide opportunity, and to secure individual liberty for ourselves and our posterity.

    A police state is a small price to pay for living in the freest country on earth.

Similar Threads

  1. The BEST Pro-Encryption Argument Ever!
    By Son_of_Liberty90 in forum Privacy & Data Security
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-17-2016, 12:31 PM
  2. Massie: I Stand with Apple in Protecting Encryption
    By presence in forum Thomas Massie Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-17-2016, 09:30 AM
  3. Rand Paul on APPLE / FBI and Encryption
    By presence in forum Rand Paul Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-20-2016, 04:22 PM
  4. Justin Amash Defends Apple On Encryption
    By tsai3904 in forum Justin Amash Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-18-2016, 12:26 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts