Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: FBI admits that ALL its forensic experts exaggerated hair evidence at every criminal trial

  1. #1

    Angry FBI admits that ALL its forensic experts exaggerated hair evidence at every criminal trial

    Oops.

    FBI admits that ALL its forensic experts exaggerated hair evidence at every criminal trial for nearly 20 years

    By Wills Robinson

    The FBI and Justice Department have admitted forensic examiners from a DNA unit gave flawed evidence at nearly all United States criminal trials spanning 20 years.

    It has been reported that 26 employees in the agency's microscopic hair comparison laboratory overstated forensic matches so they favored prosecutors in the 1980s and 1990s.

    Research involving the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and the Innocence Project say that 95 per cent of 268 trials reviewed had been impacted.

    The Washington Post reported that of the 200 convictions affected, 32 defendants were sentenced to death - 14 of which have since been executed or died behind bars.

    Those who are still alive have been sent letters explaining the errors and how they can used further DNA testing to prove the evidence.

    The mistakes do not automatically prove the convict's innocence.

    Continued...
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    The mistakes do not automatically prove the convict's innocence.
    No but they DO prove malice on the part of government and her agents.

    I'd like to suggest that every prosecutor involved be required to provide private legal counsel of the convict's choice out of his own pocket, no public-pretenders and no tax-dollars.

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by tod evans View Post
    No but they DO prove malice on the part of government and her agents.

    I'd like to suggest that every prosecutor involved be required to provide private legal counsel of the convict's choice out of his own pocket, no public-pretenders and no tax-dollars.
    And they do prove criminal negligence under color of law. Some rat bastards should be in prison but not a thing will be done.

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by phill4paul View Post
    And they do prove criminal negligence under color of law. Some rat bastards should be in prison but not a thing will be done.
    And this is why every government employee's home address and familial ties must be public record....



Similar Threads

  1. Forensic evidence tampering is widespread in US
    By dude58677 in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-10-2016, 09:03 PM
  2. FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades
    By Suzanimal in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-09-2015, 11:26 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-19-2015, 09:20 AM
  4. Experts: No evidence of Iranian nuclear weapons program
    By Alabama Supporter in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2007, 09:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •