Reply With Quote
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Last edited by mello; 04-07-2015 at 02:56 PM.
Just watching coverage of the The Five on Fox and when Juan Williams was going on and on about Hillary, the rest of them where talking about the authenticity that she lacks but that Rand has plenty of it. Dana Perino pointed out how Rand can actually beat Hillary in PA which I was happy to see/hear on a mainstream outlet. If we can get these commentators to actually mention Rand's abilities against Hillary, this will go a long way to helping the cause.
I think Rand's only path to a primary victory involves endlessly touting the polls where he's the best candidate to take Hillary on in the swing states and light blue states.Originally Posted by FSP-Rebel
ABC News:
Last edited by mello; 04-07-2015 at 04:24 PM.
Bloomberg:
Last edited by mello; 04-07-2015 at 04:24 PM.
Wall Street Journal:
Last edited by mello; 04-07-2015 at 04:23 PM.
Fox Business:
CNN:
Peter Schiff:
CNN front page. Coup.
In New Zealand:
The Coastguard is a Charity
Air Traffic Control is a private company run on user fees
The DMV is a private non-profit
Rescue helicopters and ambulances are operated by charities and are plastered with corporate logos
The agriculture industry has zero subsidies
5% of the national vote, gets you 5 seats in Parliament
A tax return has 4 fields
Business licenses aren't a thing
Prostitution is legal
We have a constitutional right to refuse any type of medical care
NBC:
Fox News:
NewsMax:
NewsMax @ 2:05
MSNBC:
Hardball 4/6:
Fox Business:
Karl Rove on Fox News: Rand will go after "isolationist, pro dope independents in New Hampshire"
Rush Limbaugh:
Fox News:
Krauthammer on Rand Paul:
Fox News Strategy Room:
Hardball with Chris Mathews:
http://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/...y-424542787511
I heard on the radio in regards to Rand's announcement
Four out of ten republicans would consider voting for Rand Paul. 25% would NEVER vote for Rand Paul. I am intriqued why they used two different way to describe it. Why not 40% and 25%?
Posting Permissions
Connect With Us