Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: The Silver Platter Doctrine: We Have Gone Full Circle

  1. #1

    The Silver Platter Doctrine: We Have Gone Full Circle

    Now this is interesting, I just happened across the case Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960), which finally put an end to an abusive tactic, as apparently the federal government was then exempted from the exclusionary rule or fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine; however, now, with the Patriot Acts, NDAA, et al, we see a warped-obverse version of those same tactics, albeit under a pretext and fiction of fighting a war on terrorism.

    So now rather than the state serving as an agent to the federal government, the federal government is serving a dual role to both itself and the states in an effort to illegally obtain evidence against criminals, err, terrorists, or whoever else they feel like going fishing for.

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fed.../206/case.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elkins_...atter_doctrine

    As in Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)--Overruled in Katz, MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS, dissenting. . . .

    The mail is a public service furnished by the Government. The telephone is a public service furnished by its authority. There is, in essence, no difference between the sealed letter and the private telephone message. As Judge Rudkin said below:

    "True, the one is visible, the other invisible; the one is tangible, the other intangible; the one is sealed, and the other unsealed, but these are distinctions without a difference."

    The evil incident to invasion of the privacy of the telephone is far greater than that involved in tampering with the mails. Whenever a telephone line is tapped, the privacy of the persons at both ends of the line is invaded and all conversations between them upon any subject, and, although proper, confidential and privileged, may be overheard. Moreover, the tapping of one man's telephone line involves the tapping of the telephone of every other person whom he may call or who may call him. As a means of espionage, writs of assistance and general warrants are but puny instruments of tyranny and oppression when compared with wiretapping.
    ...
    The makers of our Constitution undertook to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness. They recognized the significance of man's spiritual nature, of his feelings, and of his intellect. They knew that only a part of the pain, pleasure and satisfactions of life are to be found in material things. They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone -- the most comprehensive of rights, and the right most valued by civilized men. To protect that right, every unjustifiable intrusion by the Government upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the means employed, must be deemed a violation of the Fourth Amendment. And the use, as evidence in a criminal proceeding, of facts ascertained by such intrusion must be deemed a violation of the Fifth.
    ...
    Decency, security and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that, in the administration of the criminal law, the end justifies the means -- to declare that the Government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal -- would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this Court should resolutely set its face.
    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fed.../438/case.html
    Last edited by Weston White; 03-19-2015 at 02:30 AM.
    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding one’s self in the ranks of the insane.” — Marcus Aurelius

    They’re not buying it. CNN, you dumb bastards!” — President Trump 2020

    Consilio et Animis de Oppresso Liber



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.


Similar Threads

  1. Paul Ryan Comes Full Circle
    By AuH20 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-14-2013, 09:54 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-20-2012, 05:29 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-16-2012, 12:37 PM
  4. Now it comes full circle
    By Kraig in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-06-2009, 12:14 PM
  5. Racism - Full Circle
    By constituent in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-11-2008, 08:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •