Why we SHOULDN'T eat three meals a day: Sticking rigidly to breakfast, lunch and dinner may be damaging our health
By Madlen Davies
Eating three meals a day is as much a part of our routine as getting up in the morning and going to sleep in the evening.
Now, experts have warned eating breakfast, lunch and dinner may be damaging our health.
In fact, there is no evidence eating three square meals a day is beneficial to the body’s needs for energy, the website Mother Jones reports.
In fact, skipping meals and fasting could actually be better for health than sticking to rigid eating patterns.
Historian Abigail Carroll told journalist Kiera Butler that these meals are cultural constructions European settlers enforced on Native Americans.
In her new book, ‘Three Squares: The Invention of the American Meal’, Ms Carroll said the settlers ate meals at regimented times and considered this more ‘civilised’ than the natives whose eating patterns varied with the seasons, and included fasting.
A quirk of history has meant this pattern has been heralded as healthy, when in fact there is no evidence for this assertion, Ms Carroll said.
Continued...
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us