Rand Paul slams Clinton: Benghazi 'preclude[s] her from even being considered for higher office'
By Caitlin Dickson
If
Rand Paul were commander in chief, his strategy for fighting
Islamic militants in the Middle East would start with the
Kurds.
“I would arm the Kurds directly,” the Republican senator and potential presidential candidate told Yahoo Global News Anchor
Katie Couric. The two sat down in Washington on Wednesday, just hours after the FBI announced it had arrested three men charged with plotting to join the Islamic State, or ISIS, and stage attacks against the United States.*
Despite
urging Congress to make an official declaration of war — for the first time since World War II — against
ISIS last November, the Kentucky senator’s
reputation as an isolationist still precedes him. Dismissing that as a
“mischaracterization,” Paul told Couric he’s
not willing to send American troops to fight anywhere if the people who live there are not also willing to fight.
And he believes the Kurds — the disenfranchised ethnic groups whose Iraqi contingent has been fighting ISIS for months — are particularly up to the task.
“The only people over there that can fight and have been showing some ability to fight are the Kurds,” Paul said. “The president has been sending weapons to Baghdad. They’re not adequately getting to Kurdistan. I would fund them directly. I would take some of the weaponry that we have left over in Afghanistan and I would send that directly to the Kurds.”
But at home where, Couric pointed out, the
FBI is currently involved in
over a thousand counterterrorism cases in all 50 states, Paul made clear that even the threat of ISIS was not enough to shake some of his staunchest convictions. These include his dedication to sending
“a clear signal to the president that it’s unacceptable for him to write the law,” even at the risk of defunding the
Department of Homeland Security.
Another conviction is his staunch opposition to the
Patriot Act, which Couric said a high-level law enforcement source cited as influential in apprehending the three men arrested Wednesday.
“I think you can have the Constitution. You can have the level that says you have to have probable cause and you have to call a judge,” he said. “You have to name the person that you’re interested in investigating. You can do all of that and stop terrorists at the same time.”
“People weren’t doing their jobs, and they went crazy-hysterical after 9/11, saying, ‘Oh, we need all these new powers.
Please, give us your liberty, you know, in exchange for security,’” he continued. “But really
they weren’t doing their job [and that] is why we didn’t catch terrorists before.”
Perhaps most unwavering of all Paul’s convictions is his firm belief that former Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton is to blame for the 2012 terror attack on the U.S. Embassy in
Benghazi and that her
failure to “defend our ambassador,” should “preclude her from even being considered for the higher office.”
“The biggest mistake Hillary Clinton made, and I think this will be an albatross over her neck for the rest of the campaign — I don’t think she’ll be able to overcome this — is that
when she was asked to provide security for Benghazi, she didn’t do it,” he said.
Certain about the future of the Clinton campaign, Paul was decidedly less declarative when asked about his own White House aspirations.
“Sometime in March, in April, we’re going to make a firm, final decision,” he said. “I’m someone who wants to defend the country, but I’m not eager for war. And we’ll make that presentation to the people and see if it resonates.”
He may not be ready to announce his candidacy, but Paul showed
he’s adept at dodging uncomfortable questions [
] when Couric brought up recent comments his father, former Republican Representative and three-time presidential candidate
Ron Paul, made claiming that members of the
Congressional Black Caucus were
only anti-war “because they want all of that money to go to food stamps.”
“I have a great relationship, you know, with the Congressional Black Caucus,” Paul replied when pressed for a comment on his father’s words.
“I am probably the leading voice among Republicans for reforming the criminal justice system. I’m the only Republican who has been saying over and over again that the war on drugs has had a disproportionate impact on people of color. I’ll continue to fight those battles, and I think I’ll be judged on my own actions.”
A diversion, for sure, but a smooth one. Not only did he manage to avoid being implicated in
his father’s indiscretion, [
] Paul planted the seed for his next sitdown with Couric, this time accompanied by his unlikely partner in criminal justice reform, Democratic
Senator Cory Booker.
Also Wednesday, Couric talked to the bipartisan duo about the
Redeem Act, the
comprehensive sentencing reform bill that Paul and Booker co-sponsored over the summer. The Redeem Act aims to crack down on the country’s recidivism epidemic by providing nonviolent offenders who’ve served their time the opportunity to expunge their records and, ideally, become gainfully employed.
This serious, and potentially historic, piece of legislation is the product of an unlikely collaboration that blossomed, of all places, on Twitter.
“[Paul] has the same penchant that I do to use that platform for important policy issues but [also] just to be yourself and joke around,” Booker told Couric. “So, I got up in his
Festivus list of grievances, and I let him have it back. And before you knew it we were talking about drug policy reform.”
http://news.yahoo.com/katie-couric-i...160100857.html
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Brett85
Connect With Us