Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 68

Thread: Bisexuals hopeful as 1 of their own becomes a governor

  1. #1

    Bisexuals hopeful as 1 of their own becomes a governor

    Before Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2002, such freedoms in the US were unimaginable.
    On similar note, there is some controversy if America has elected its first bisexual or gay Prez or not yet.


    Bisexuals hopeful as 1 of their own becomes a governor

    By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer | February 14, 2015


    • Photo By Don Ryan/AP
      FILE - In this Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012 file photo, Oregon Democratic Secretary of State Kate Brown celebrates President Barack Obama's projected victory after winning her race at Democratic headquarters in Portland, Ore. The sudden advent of an openly bisexual governor in Oregon may provide a chance to broaden understanding of America's bi community.


    NEW YORK (AP) — "LGBT" has become a household term amid sweeping advances for gay rights, and yet the "B'' sometimes seems like an awkward fit. The sudden advent of America's first openly bisexual governor may provide a chance to ease the awkwardness and broaden understanding of the bi community.

    Kate Brown, Oregon's secretary of state, is in line to replace Democratic Gov. John Kitzhaber when he steps down Wednesday amid an ethics scandal. Brown, serving her second term after many years in the legislature, lives in Portland with her husband and two stepchildren and has been open throughout her political career about being bisexual.

    http://www.chron.com/news/politics/a...-a-6081324.php



    Related


    Transgender and Bisexual Join Gay in the State of the Union
    Slate Magazine (blog)-Jan 21, 2015
    Despite the impending Supreme Court showdown over marriage equality, President Barack Obama's 2015 State of the Union address ...

    Obama says struggle for marriage rights 'a story of freedom'
    Washington Blade-Jan 21, 2015

    Obama Was A Cocaine-Using Gay Hustler, Says Woman Who Claims To Have Been Hawaiian Classmate
    11/08/2013
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/1...n_4242447.html

    Joan Rivers Calls President Obama Gay, Says First Lady Is 'Tranny' (Video)

    by Ryan Gajewski
    7/3/2014 8:35pm PDT
    Joan Rivers, no stranger to controversy, told a reporter this week that President Barack Obama is gay and that first lady Michelle Obama is "a transgender."
    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/new...t-obama-716738


    Woman who called Michelle Obama "tranny" honored with Grammy, "Warrior of Truth" Awards

    Feb. 9, 2015






    Top Obama donor and US Ambassador to Belgium in child sex solicitation scandal
    U.S. Ambassador Howard Gutman: Allegations of child sex solicitation

    A leaked government memo says “(t)he agent began his investigation and had determined that the ambassador routinely ditched his protective security detail in order to solicit sexual favors from both prostitutes and minor children.”It also notes that Gutman’s “protective detail and the embassy’s surveillance detection team” knew a great deal about his actions.
    The Mail indicates that the Ambassador is “a top donor to President Obama, having raised a total of $775,000 for his 2008 campaign and inauguration committee, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

    http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/conscience-realist/2013/jun/12/report-us-ambassador-howard-gutman-solicited-child



    Fundraiser charged with child sex abuse frequently met with Obama
    Tuesday, November 25, 2014

    A prominent gay rights activist charged last week with sexually abusing a 15-year-old boy is a strong supporter of President Obama who has visited the White House more than a half-dozen times in the past two years, visitor logs show.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

  4. #3

  5. #4
    What are they hopeful for?

  6. #5
    Freedom, like anyone else. Although a lot of the time they don't know it.

    Come on USA, over here we have had the top five positions in the country occupied by women simultaneously, we have had transgendered MP's and almost anything else you can think of.

    Yet, somehow the least economically restrictive government around.
    In New Zealand:
    The Coastguard is a Charity
    Air Traffic Control is a private company run on user fees
    The DMV is a private non-profit
    Rescue helicopters and ambulances are operated by charities and are plastered with corporate logos
    The agriculture industry has zero subsidies
    5% of the national vote, gets you 5 seats in Parliament
    A tax return has 4 fields
    Business licenses aren't a thing
    Prostitution is legal
    We have a constitutional right to refuse any type of medical care

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by idiom View Post
    Freedom, like anyone else.
    I don't believe that.

  8. #7
    Okay. So if gay marriage becomes the law of the and, and she is restricted to picking either a man or a woman to marry, but not both simultaneously, is that discrimination?
    9/11 Thermate experiments

    Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

    "I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

    "We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

    "It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
    Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
    The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
    Okay. So if gay marriage becomes the law of the and, and she is restricted to picking either a man or a woman to marry, but not both simultaneously, is that discrimination?
    Sure it is. That is discrimination against polygamists...and people who marry animals.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Sola_Fide View Post
    What are they hopeful for?
    I was wondering that myself...

    Getting laid while visiting the governor's mansion?

  12. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    I was wondering that myself...

    Getting laid while visiting the governor's mansion?
    Maybe being accepted?
    There is no spoon.

  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Ender View Post
    Maybe being accepted?
    Equating a politician's similar sexual preference with your own and waving that as a banner makes about as much sense as claiming you are good at football because your last name is Brady.

    Besides, how much more "accepted" can LBGT sexual preferences be?

    It's on universal display in real life and in every form of media 24/7.
    Last edited by Anti Federalist; 02-15-2015 at 08:40 PM.

  14. #12
    Is it just me or does the premise of this article not make any sense at all? I am highly pessimistic that the election of a token bi individual will make any difference in how bi people are perceived.

    Quote Originally Posted by Anti-Federalist
    It's on universal display in real life and in every form of media 24/7.
    I'd say biphobia/bi erasure is a legitimate phenomenon, as evidenced by the fact that it is being (jokingly?) misunderstood in this very thread.
    Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just and that his justice cannot sleep forever. Thomas Jefferson

  15. #13
    ..
    Last edited by specsaregood; 05-20-2016 at 08:47 PM.

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Ender View Post
    Maybe being accepted?
    Accepted in regards to what? I thought you said you were a "minister"? Don't you know that the Bible condemns homosexuality?

  17. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Rothbardian Girl View Post
    Is it just me or does the premise of this article not make any sense at all? I am highly pessimistic that the election of a token bi individual will make any difference in how bi people are perceived.


    I'd say biphobia/bi erasure is a legitimate phenomenon, as evidenced by the fact that it is being (jokingly?) misunderstood in this very thread.
    It doesn't make sense. But I asked you why homosexuality and communism has been so historically linked and you never answered.

  18. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Sola_Fide View Post
    Accepted in regards to what? I thought you said you were a "minister"? Don't you know that the Bible condemns homosexuality?
    Do you believe in freedom or not? What consenting adults do should be their own business.

    Matthew 7:1-3

    7 Judge not, that ye be not judged.

    2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

    3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
    Last edited by Ender; 02-15-2015 at 09:04 PM.
    There is no spoon.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Ender View Post
    Do you believe in freedom or not? What consenting adults do should be their own business.

    Matthew 7:1-3

    7 Judge not, that ye be not judged.

    2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

    3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
    Whoa...wait a second. I am not talking about politics. I am a voluntarist. I am talking about morality. Don't you understand that it is okay to be against sin without supporting legislation against sins? Or did they not teach you that in seminary? By the way, what seminary did you go to?

  21. #18

  22. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Sola_Fide View Post
    Whoa...wait a second. I am not talking about politics. I am a voluntarist. I am talking about morality. Don't you understand that it is okay to be against sin without supporting legislation against sins? Or did they not teach you that in seminary? By the way, what seminary did you go to?
    Hate to tell you but this is the Political News forum- save it for the religious forum- and my life is none of your business.
    There is no spoon.

  23. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Sola_Fide View Post
    Whoa...wait a second. I am not talking about politics. I am a voluntarist. I am talking about morality. Don't you understand that it is okay to be against sin without supporting legislation against sins? Or did they not teach you that in seminary? By the way, what seminary did you go to?
    I've, at times, wondered why some voluntarists refute free will but then hold a voluntarist mindset politically. Off topic, I know, but your thought there just reminded me of it. It's kind of scwewy. Morality is nothing more than ones own perception of right or wrong. And so order in that regard would be subjective.
    Last edited by Natural Citizen; 02-15-2015 at 09:30 PM.

  24. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Sola_Fide View Post
    It doesn't make sense. But I asked you why homosexuality and communism has been so historically linked and you never answered.
    Uh, well, I apologize - I haven't happened to see your question in the thread. But I would have to question your premise as well. If you are talking about historical communist thought, homosexuality tended to be seen as the product of a decadent, bourgeois culture. Leftists in general have an extremely poor track record when it comes to defending homosexuality (among other things). Basically, Marxist-Leninists and their associated regimes tended to be much less accepting of homosexuality, particularly after Stalin came to power. Trotskyists and Marx & Engels themselves suggested the state had no right to interfere in sexual matters.

    I would also point out that although academia has largely shifted to defending LGBT rights in recent times, there is a stupid theory out there that suggests gays should automatically be socialist because "*****ness disrupts the capitalist binary"... but one look around your average gay neighborhood shows that gay business owners tend to be the first group to gentrify decaying neighborhoods - in other words, they are capitalist vanguards.

    tl;dr Communist/socialist thought is far too fractured to make any sweeping generations about their tolerance of homosexuality.
    Last edited by Rothbardian Girl; 02-15-2015 at 10:09 PM.
    Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just and that his justice cannot sleep forever. Thomas Jefferson

  25. #22
    A dem gov in Oregon bringing hope ? I think not .

  26. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Rothbardian Girl View Post
    Uh, well, I apologize - I haven't happened to see your question in the thread. But I would have to question your premise as well. If you are talking about historical communist thought, homosexuality tended to be seen as the product of a decadent, bourgeois culture. Leftists in general have an extremely poor track record when it comes to defending homosexuality (among other things). Basically, Marxist-Leninists and their associated regimes tended to be much less accepting of homosexuality, particularly after Stalin came to power. Trotskyists and Marx & Engels themselves suggested the state had no right to interfere in sexual matters.

    I would also point out that although academia has largely shifted to defending LGBT rights in recent times, there is a stupid theory out there that suggests gays should automatically be socialist because "*****ness disrupts the capitalist binary"... but one look around your average gay neighborhood shows that gay business owners tend to be the first group to gentrify decaying neighborhoods - in other words, they are capitalist vanguards.

    tl;dr Communist/socialist thought is far too fractured to make any sweeping generations about their tolerance of homosexuality.
    So the 45 goals of Communist Party in 1963 has nothing to do with homosexuality? Why does it say this?

    26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

  27. #24
    excuse me while I go look for $#@!s to give...







    nope couldn't find any.
    "I know the urge to arm yourself, because that’s what I did. I was trained in firearms. When I walked to the hospital when my husband was sick, I carried a concealed weapon. I made the determination that if somebody was going to try to take me out I was going to take them with me."

    Diane Feinstein, 1995



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Rothbardian Girl View Post
    Is it just me or does the premise of this article not make any sense at all? I am highly pessimistic that the election of a token bi individual will make any difference in how bi people are perceived.


    I'd say biphobia/bi erasure is a legitimate phenomenon, as evidenced by the fact that it is being (jokingly?) misunderstood in this very thread.
    You know what? I don't get it. I'll be honest and say I don't. Oh I get how people can be bisexual and all. I just don't see the need to broadcast it. If two people are in a same sex marriage they are in a gay relationship even if one or other bi. At least that's the case legally. Same if they are opposite sex they are in a heterosexual marriage. And outside the legal realm, who cares? Do people into BDSM need to point that out in an election campaign?
    Last edited by jmdrake; 02-16-2015 at 12:25 PM.
    9/11 Thermate experiments

    Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

    "I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

    "We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

    "It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
    Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
    The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

  30. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
    Okay. So if gay marriage becomes the law of the and, and she is restricted to picking either a man or a woman to marry, but not both simultaneously, is that discrimination?
    After "gay marriage" success, are you suggesting next battle will be over "LGBT Marriage" . Very tough question from discrimination point of view, best not to raise such explosive questions that could torment national political system.

    Brown lives in Portland, Oregon, with her husband Dan Little. She has two stepchildren, Dylan and Jessie. She identifies as bisexual and was the country's first openly bisexual statewide officeholder

  31. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by enhanced_deficit View Post
    After "gay marriage" success, are you suggesting next battle will be over "LGBT Marriage" . Very tough question from discrimination point of view, best not to raise such explosive questions that could torment national political system.
    I don't ever offer the topic up in the context of politics. I believe in absolute freedom. I am offering the topic up in the context of morality. Two different issues altogether.

  32. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Sola_Fide View Post
    I don't ever offer the topic up in the context of politics. I believe in absolute freedom. I am offering the topic up in the context of morality. Two different issues altogether.
    Figures. From the guy whose sole purpose on this board is evangelization.

  33. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty View Post
    Figures. From the guy whose sole purpose on this board is evangelization.
    No, I think the Christian worldview touches on all aspects of life.

  34. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by Sola_Fide View Post
    No, I think the Christian worldview touches on all aspects of life.

    Yes, you're evangelizing on this board. Man up and admit it.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. I'm honestly more hopeful these days
    By ghostofbort in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-20-2016, 07:01 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-21-2014, 02:54 PM
  3. Which 3 Senate races are you most hopeful for?
    By JohnEngland in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 10-13-2010, 10:10 AM
  4. Cato Tonight: Why we should be hopeful.
    By yongrel in forum Election 2008
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-04-2008, 08:54 PM
  5. Hopeful article in NY times
    By KewlRonduderules in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-10-2008, 09:15 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •