Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: U.S. court: law enforcement officers can shoot you in the back

  1. #1

    U.S. court: law enforcement officers can shoot you in the back

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Friday ruled that federal law enforcement officers cannot be sued for shooting a black 16-year-old four times in 2007 as he attempted to drive away from them after the officers had asked to speak to him.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the three deputy U.S. marshals had sufficient justification to use deadly force when they fired on Michael Fenwick.

    The ruling comes at a time when law enforcement's use of deadly force has been widely debated in the aftermath of the shooting death of an unarmed black 18-year-old man in Ferguson, Missouri by a white police officer last August.

    In the January 2007 incident in Washington, Fenwick drove away from the officers after they had asked to speak to him. The officers, Andrew Pudimott, Jeremy Fischer and John Mickle, ordered Fenwick to stop. He ignored them, and clipped Pudimott with the side mirror of the car as he drove past.

    The officers then opened fire, hitting Fenwick four times. He recovered from the injuries.

    Fenwick filed a civil lawsuit against the officers after he was convicted in criminal court of armed assault on Pudimott. The weapon Fenwick was convicted of using was the car itself.

    In Friday's ruling, the three-judge panel held that Fenwick had not shown that the officers had violated the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable search and seizure.

    Judge David Tatel said the evidence cited by the officers that Fenwick was driving recklessly and that the officers were concerned he could endanger members of the public showed that there was not a clearly established constitutional violation.

    But Tatel noted that the ruling should not be broadly applied to "shield from liability every law enforcement officer ... who fires on a fleeing motorist out of asserted concern for other officers and bystanders."


    Fenwick's attorney, David Shurtz, said in an interview that the appeals court declined to consider video showing evidence indicating the officers opened fire "when they were in no fear of bodily harm."


    The case is Fenwick v. Pudimott, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 13-5130.
    http://news.yahoo.com/u-court-backs-...163139134.html
    "IF GOD DIDN'T WANT TO HELP AMERICA, THEN WE WOULD HAVE Hillary Clinton"!!
    "let them search you,touch you,violate your Rights,just don't be a dick!"~ cdc482
    "For Wales. Why Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world. But for Wales?"
    All my life I've been at the mercy of men just following orders... Never again!~Erik Lehnsherr
    There's nothing wrong with stopping people randomly, especially near bars, restaurants etc.~Velho



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Of course we can.

    STFU and comply and you have nothing to worry about.

    Or maybe you do.

    Tough $#@!ing $#@!. - Officer Friendly.

  4. #3

  5. #4
    But Tatel noted that the ruling should not be broadly applied to "shield from liability every law enforcement officer ... who fires on a fleeing motorist out of asserted concern for other officers and bystanders."
    Meanwhile, Judge Tatel established by his findings a shield of liability for every future law enforcement officer who fires on a fleeing motorist out of asserted concern for other officers and bystanders.

    ...If a citizen cannot get away with it, neither should an uniformed officer be able to.
    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding one’s self in the ranks of the insane.” — Marcus Aurelius

    They’re not buying it. CNN, you dumb bastards!” — President Trump 2020

    Consilio et Animis de Oppresso Liber

  6. #5
    This is exactly why there was a call in NY to kill two cops for every one citizen killed by a cop. When the courts continue to rule like this, someone is gonna bump up the numbers up to three, then four, then 10, then they will go after the judges, lawyers and even court clerks. This can only escalate to very violent destruction, and it is NOT the path we need to be on.
    1776 > 1984

    The FAILURE of the United States Government to operate and maintain an
    Honest Money System , which frees the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, is the single largest contributing factor to the World's current Economic Crisis.

    The Elimination of Privacy is the Architecture of Genocide

    Belief, Money, and Violence are the three ways all people are controlled

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Our central bank is not privately owned.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    This is exactly why there was a call in NY to kill two cops for every one citizen killed by a cop. When the courts continue to rule like this, someone is gonna bump up the numbers up to three, then four, then 10, then they will go after the judges, lawyers and even court clerks. This can only escalate to very violent destruction, and it is NOT the path we need to be on.
    In my opinion this is where the true responsibility for what we're enduring now lies...

  8. #7
    I could give a #### what color any of these people were, but jfc , shooting someone in the back for leaving the scene of nothing ?
    Welcome to the 60's .

    The excuse that officers were in danger, such complete ####### bs, you just can't make this #### up folks.


    ..

  9. #8
    Bonnie And Clyde over nothing oh....wait, there is something, we need to make sure any possible parking tickets are paid....
    ....open fire boys......!!!!!



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.


Similar Threads

  1. List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States
    By Neil Desmond in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 01-12-2014, 11:59 AM
  2. 160 Law Enforcement Officers died on the job in 2010--up 37%
    By teacherone in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-28-2010, 07:39 PM
  3. Supreme Court Cuts Back Officers’ Searches of Vehicles
    By Reason in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-15-2009, 12:40 AM
  4. Supreme Court Cuts Back Officers’ Searches of Vehicles
    By Reason in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-02-2009, 07:19 PM
  5. Bulk Emailing US Soldiers/Veterans and Law Enforcement Officers?
    By Biodemocracy in forum News About The Official Campaign
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-14-2007, 10:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •