View Poll Results: Libertarian opinion of Elizabeth Warren

Voters
77. You may not vote on this poll
  • Love her

    1 1.30%
  • Hate her

    59 76.62%
  • Don't care

    17 22.08%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 47 of 47

Thread: Claim: Libertarians love Elizabeth Warren

  1. #31
    I don't hate her.

    She needs to get a real damn job though.

    That and people who enjoy bossing people around, or who think themselves as wise enough to fully comprehend the intricacies and the variables of human behavior are the last sort of people I'd ever want to be around. Goddamned Rousseaus.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #32
    I understand liking a principled progressive; they're anti-war, against drug prohibition, against subsidy and against big banks (sometimes even anti-Fed). Justin Raimondo made a good argument explaining why he supported Ralph Nader a few elections ago, and Dennis Kucinich was more of a liberty-ally than 90% of neocons.

    Elizabeth Warren on the other hand, isn't a principled progressive. She's too afraid to even come out for legalizing weed. I think a big chunk of her supporters among Democrats don't even actually know who she is or what she's about. I have lots of progressive friends who seem to think she's come out against the drug war, called for massive monetary reform, auditing the Fed, withdrawing all the troops, all sorts of BS she never did. Preogrssives just hear she's "one of us" from liberal blogs and just fill in the blanks, regardless of the truth.
    NeoReactionary. American High Tory.

    The counter-revolution will not be televised.



  4. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  5. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by ThePaleoLibertarian View Post
    I understand liking a principled progressive; they're anti-war, against drug prohibition, against subsidy and against big banks (sometimes even anti-Fed). Justin Raimondo made a good argument explaining why he supported Ralph Nader a few elections ago, and Dennis Kucinich was more of a liberty-ally than 90% of neocons.

    Elizabeth Warren on the other hand, isn't a principled progressive. She's too afraid to even come out for legalizing weed. I think a big chunk of her supporters among Democrats don't even actually know who she is or what she's about. I have lots of progressive friends who seem to think she's come out against the drug war, called for massive monetary reform, auditing the Fed, withdrawing all the troops, all sorts of BS she never did. Preogrssives just hear she's "one of us" from liberal blogs and just fill in the blanks, regardless of the truth.
    A lot like how the GOP Establishment has some Tea Partiers convinced that some serious establishmentarians are actually Tea, I suppose.

  6. #34
    I have a very strong dislike for her, and here's why...because Elizabeth Warren talks about government exactly the same way that Mike Huckabee talks about Jesus. The difference being that Mike Huckabee's faith in Jesus - no matter how strong - can help or hurt nobody besides Mike Huckabee himself; yet history is rife with bloody reminders that one misguided idealogue's faith in government can spell death and destruction for millions.
    Last edited by BuddyRey; 02-02-2015 at 08:09 PM.
    "When it gets down to having to use violence, then you are playing the system's game. The establishment will irritate you - pull your beard, flick your face - to make you fight, because once they've got you violent then they know how to handle you. The only thing they don't know how to handle is non-violence and humor. "

    ---John Lennon


    "I EAT NEOCONS FOR BREAKFAST!!!"

    ---Me

  7. #35
    If she was in the vain of Dennis Kucinich or Mike Gravel, she'd be on my radar. But I honestly don't know enough about her to care.

  8. #36
    Hate her! Socialist Nazi!

  9. #37
    The opposite of BOTH love and hate is indifference.

  10. #38
    worst kind of communist progressive

    more pelosi than kucinich

  11. #39
    I had no place to vote ... There are some things about Warren that I do like. I do like her plans to break up the banksters, resulting in a break up of the Federal Reserve. I do like that Obama worked 24/7 to convince her to run against Hiltary the Hun and she wouldn't be swayed. I don't know nearly enough about her, but would like to know more .. She is very well spoken, well educated, very impressive. And I am registered as a Libertarian. I do not believe she is bought and paid for. There may be some political issues I do not agree with her; but I believe she is honest in her views and not tainted by Globalist interests. For this reason, I would consider voting for her. Other than Rand Paul, all other candidates are simple New Orleans whores.

    Who cares that she mentioned she is an American Indian. I'm half American Indian ... Anyone born in the United States should have Indian blood in them.

  12. #40
    Account Restricted. Admin to review account standing


    Posts
    1,125
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    ...unfortunately, i suspect replacing 'elizabeth warren' with 'ted cruz' would have yielded many more 'love him' votes...

    ...ime, sadly, 'liberty' voters are as clueless as warren voters...



  13. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  14. #41
    Hate is too strong a word. She's just the latest in a long line of corporatist stooges pretending to be against them. Lenin described the phenomenon.

  15. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by H. E. Panqui View Post
    ...unfortunately, i suspect replacing 'elizabeth warren' with 'ted cruz' would have yielded many more 'love him' votes...

    ...ime, sadly, 'liberty' voters are as clueless as warren voters...
    Actually I have a feeling you would've had more "hate him" votes.

    Guess one of us needs to start that poll to see who's money's on the right horse.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sister Miriam Godwinson View Post
    We Must Dissent.

  16. #43
    Folks can CLAIM anything.

  17. #44
    She was against Audit the Fed. Have no interest in her.

  18. #45
    I voted "Don't Care" because I simply don't.

    I do think she's an imbecile and a typical self-hating nitwit (she's white as can be but tries to act Native American). Typical proggy, though. Nothing to like about them.
    They tend to line with us on social issues not because they like liberty, but *usually* because they're so enamored with taking down religious dogma (I'm not going to argue about that, I'm just stating what I believe is many of their reasons for doing what they do).
    Welcome to the R3VOLUTION!

  19. #46
    Nope. She's a socialist.

  20. #47
    I like Warren. In many ways I think she's spot on with our problems. I think she's naive and foolish with her solutions; in essence she among those that believes regulation can win the arms race against regulatory capture. I disagree. But she's good people. I often cringe but I'll listen and nod at times; between pondering how I'd interject. I'd love for her to come to the side of liberty; she'd be a great ally if she saw the light.

    She's among the principled liberals. I disagree wholeheartedly, but I can respect that she's rooted in a philosophy. In general I find the Grayson/Warren/Kucinich/Sanders liberal wing classier than the overtly crony liberal establishment Hillary/Kerry/Biden/Obama crowd.


    I'll choose not to vote in the poll.

    Warren isn’t wrong to complain that big business has too much influence over public policy.
    But that influence isn’t the result of insufficient government intervention.
    It’s the result of a government that is too massive and too willing to intrude in free markets.
    http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/2014/12/what-elizabeth-warren-missed-in-her-big-bank-tirade/

    Last edited by presence; 08-02-2015 at 09:49 AM.

    'We endorse the idea of voluntarism; self-responsibility: Family, friends, and churches to solve problems, rather than saying that some monolithic government is going to make you take care of yourself and be a better person. It's a preposterous notion: It never worked, it never will. The government can't make you a better person; it can't make you follow good habits.' - Ron Paul 1988

    Awareness is the Root of Liberation Revolution is Action upon Revelation

    'Resistance and Disobedience in Economic Activity is the Most Moral Human Action Possible' - SEK3

    Flectere si nequeo superos, Acheronta movebo.

    ...the familiar ritual of institutional self-absolution...
    ...for protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment...


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


Similar Threads

  1. Elizabeth Warren On The Record
    By PAF in forum 2016 Presidential Election: GOP & Dem
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-31-2015, 08:41 PM
  2. How the GOP Invented Elizabeth Warren
    By NACBA in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-13-2015, 12:18 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-15-2012, 09:35 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-15-2012, 09:04 AM
  5. Elizabeth Warren Was Right! Except...
    By Xerographica in forum Political Philosophy & Government Policy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-23-2011, 04:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •