Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 32

Thread: Is Lindsey Graham running for president to Troll Rand Paul?

  1. #1

    Is Lindsey Graham running for president to Troll Rand Paul?

    On Thursday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) launched an exploratory committee for a 2016 presidential run, as Arlette Saenz of ABC News reported.
    The committee, named "Security through Strength," will allow Graham to fundraise while he decides whether to officially launch a bid.
    The committee's website implies that a Graham presidential bid will focus on foreign policy. It quotes Graham citing Ronald Reagan's "Peace Through Strength" policy for the Cold War, and adds that for "radical Islam," whose "followers are committed to destroying us and our way of life," Graham's own policy will be "Security through Strength."

    What it means

    http://www.vox.com/2015/1/29/7944905...president-2016



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    As far as I can see, Lindsay Graham has just about enough brains to run for president because he was told to, and no more.

    And there could be an element of 'trolling Rand Paul' to it, in that it will make the whole rest of the field seem to be even more neocon than it is, thus making Rand seem 'out of the mainstream' (and they will pointedly not say to the masses that the whole of the Republican Party except Rand Paul is out of step with the bulk of the American electorate, which is why they keep losing the one nationwide general election).

    This will make those neocon interventionists look reasonable because Graham will, as usual, be foaming at the mouth more than they are. Or so they hope. But if we do our jobs right, we can paint anyone who ever agrees with the fruitcake (in more ways than one) as being the same thing only slicker. And thereby use him to further divide the idiot vote among the neocons, and drive more sane votes out of the neocon camp completely.

    So I, for one, sincerely hope he throws his tiara in the ring.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    You only want the freedoms that will undermine the nation and lead to the destruction of liberty.

  4. #3
    That effeminate hack will get eaten alive by literally every other candidate if he decides to run.

  5. #4
    It seems as though John Bolton is going to run for the same reason, just to attack Rand on the foreign policy issues.

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Traditional Conservative View Post
    It seems as though John Bolton is going to run for the same reason, just to attack Rand on the foreign policy issues.
    So instead of good cop/bad cop they're going to play smart cop/dumbass cop?
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    You only want the freedoms that will undermine the nation and lead to the destruction of liberty.

  7. #6
    Graham doesn't know how to troll. He might just raise money and spend it all on attack ads against Rand in Iowa though.
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    It's a balance between appeasing his supporters, appeasing the deep state and reaching his own goals.
    ~Resident Badgiraffe




  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    So I, for one, sincerely hope he throws his tiara in the ring.
    Lolz!
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    It's a balance between appeasing his supporters, appeasing the deep state and reaching his own goals.
    ~Resident Badgiraffe




  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by NACBA View Post
    The committee's website implies that a Graham presidential bid will focus on foreign policy. It quotes Graham citing Ronald Reagan's "Peace Through Strength" policy for the Cold War, and adds that for "radical Islam," whose "followers are committed to destroying us and our way of life," Graham's own policy will be "Security through Strength."
    What a dumbass. Rand's strategy is Peace/Strength. Graham's is War/Weakness. You can't use peace through strength as an attack against Rand. I guess its just a fundraising tag though.
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    It's a balance between appeasing his supporters, appeasing the deep state and reaching his own goals.
    ~Resident Badgiraffe






  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    On Thursday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) Adam Sutler (N-SC) launched an exploratory committee for a 2016 presidential run, as Arlette Saenz of ABC News reported. The committee, named "Security through Strength," [...]
    Last edited by Occam's Banana; 01-30-2015 at 11:04 AM.
    The Bastiat Collection · FREE PDF · FREE EPUB · PAPER
    Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)

    • "When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense, or of losing his respect for the law."
      -- The Law (p. 54)
    • "Government is that great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
      -- Government (p. 99)
    • "[W]ar is always begun in the interest of the few, and at the expense of the many."
      -- Economic Sophisms - Second Series (p. 312)
    • "There are two principles that can never be reconciled - Liberty and Constraint."
      -- Harmonies of Political Economy - Book One (p. 447)

    · tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito ·

  12. #10
    Graham won't run... he does want to throw out the neocon platform and drum up support for killing more people, though.
    There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.
    -Major General Smedley Butler, USMC,
    Two-Time Congressional Medal of Honor Winner
    Author of, War is a Racket!

    It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours.
    - Diogenes of Sinope

  13. #11
    Peter King has been talking about running too. I guess there are a lot of NeoCon doofuses who only want to be on the stage to attack Rand. They would hopefully help him get a chance to clarify it better with rebuttals though.
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    It's a balance between appeasing his supporters, appeasing the deep state and reaching his own goals.
    ~Resident Badgiraffe




  14. #12
    I think he thinks it's his turn. This is the worst reason ever.
    #NashvilleStrong

    “I’m a doctor. That’s a baby.”~~~Dr. Manny Sethi

  15. #13
    Let him/them try.

    It will be my supreme joy to witness Rand rhetorically eviscerate these poseurs for the world to witness.

    This purging finally needs to happen, once and for all.

    And please let Chris Wallace mediate.
    Last edited by georgiaboy; 01-30-2015 at 12:36 PM.
    The bigger government gets, the smaller I wish it was.
    My new motto: More Love, Less Laws

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    So instead of good cop/bad cop they're going to play smart cop/dumbass cop?
    Which cop would be the smart cop and which cop would be the dumbass cop?

  17. #15
    Yall don't get it.... he might want to go after Rand and be an attack dog, but he also is in a tremendously powerful position if he can shape the outcome of the primary in South Carolina.

    Like Romney, he will be able to negotiate a lot of things simply because he has a big hand in who wins South Carolina.
    __________________________________________________ ________________
    "A politician will do almost anything to keep their job, even become a patriot" - Hearst

  18. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by William Tell View Post
    What a dumbass. Rand's strategy is Peace/Strength. Graham's is War/Weakness. You can't use peace through strength as an attack against Rand. I guess its just a fundraising tag though.
    "Weakness Through War!" Awesome! You should send this to Rand's staff.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    A scheme for Lindsey to run just to screw up S.C. for Rand is definitely something establishment figures would do to make sure Rand doesn't get the nomination. We've seen worse and I see stuff like this all the time in our local/state GOP.
    THE SQUAD of RPF
    1. enhanced_deficit - Paid Troll / John Bolton book promoter
    2. Devil21 - LARPing Wizard, fake magical script reader
    3. Firestarter - Tax Troll; anti-tax = "criminal behavior"
    4. TheCount - Comet Pizza Pedo Denier <-- sick

    @Ehanced_Deficit's real agenda on RPF =troll:

    Who spends this much time copy/pasting the same recycled links, photos/talking points.

    7 yrs/25k posts later RPF'ers still respond to this troll

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by anaconda View Post
    "Weakness Through War!" Awesome! You should send this to Rand's staff.
    I was gonna say War/Effeminate, but censored myself.
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    It's a balance between appeasing his supporters, appeasing the deep state and reaching his own goals.
    ~Resident Badgiraffe




  22. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by anaconda View Post
    "Weakness Through War!" Awesome! You should send this to Rand's staff.
    Yes! "Do we want Peace Through Strength or Weakness Through War"?

  23. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Collins View Post
    Yall don't get it.... he might want to go after Rand and be an attack dog, but he also is in a tremendously powerful position if he can shape the outcome of the primary in South Carolina.

    Like Romney, he will be able to negotiate a lot of things simply because he has a big hand in who wins South Carolina.
    South Carolina is War Party Central. Let em have it. Rand will clean up in purple states.
    Non-violence is the creed of those that maintain a monopoly on force.

  24. #21
    Graham is running, hoping a terror attack close to the primary season will get him the nomination.

    as far as SC, its good he's running. SC will be discounted because of Graham, FL because of Jeb and Rubio. Rand could come in 2nd in SC which would be counted by the media as a win.

  25. #22
    I don't know who I rather would have jump in among the neocons. Lindsey Graham, Peter King and John Bolton are all hysterical mouth-foaming crazy with non-coherent policies. Which will make Rand seem like the only sane alternative. This is because I don't see the likes of Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz ect daring to disagree with them.

    Will Graham even be admitted into the debates? He's polling at <1%, and I don't see many of the neocon voters even bothering to support him when they have more realistic hawkish alternatives in Bush or Rubio.

  26. #23
    Does Graham spoiling, help Jeb or Rand win a 7 way race?
    BOWLING GREEN, Kentucky – Washington liberals are trying to push through the so-called DREAM Act, which creates an official path to Democrat voter registration for 2 million college-age illegal immigrants.
    Rand Paul 2010

    Booker T. Washington:
    Cast it down among the eight millions of Negroes whose habits you know, whose
    fidelity and love you have tested in days when to have proved treacherous meant the ruin of your firesides.

  27. #24


    ....who has the artistic ability to make a Miss Lindsey version of this?



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Wait which one is the smart one?

    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    So instead of good cop/bad cop they're going to play smart cop/dumbass cop?

  30. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    So instead of good cop/bad cop they're going to play smart cop/dumbass cop?
    Wait, which one is playing the smart cop?
    Too bad our elected officials are not as aggressively trying to reduce the federal deficit as they are trying to strip us of our constitutional rights.

  31. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Koz View Post
    Wait, which one is playing the smart cop?
    and while we're at it, what's a "smart cop"?

  32. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Foreigner View Post
    I don't know who I rather would have jump in among the neocons. Lindsey Graham, Peter King and John Bolton are all hysterical mouth-foaming crazy with non-coherent policies. Which will make Rand seem like the only sane alternative. This is because I don't see the likes of Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz ect daring to disagree with them.

    Will Graham even be admitted into the debates? He's polling at <1%, and I don't see many of the neocon voters even bothering to support him when they have more realistic hawkish alternatives in Bush or Rubio.
    Considering he appears on one of the Sunday morning blather shows nearly every single week (today included) I don't really expect any lamestream media outlet to refuse to point a camera at him.

    And I think you put your finger on something. I think Graham is there to appear extreme, thereby making Jeb Bush's insane imperialism seem 'moderate'--if only by comparison.

    Expect a lot of 'Rand Paul is as far out of the mainstream as Lindsey Graham' rhetoric. Unless we can nip it in the bud.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    You only want the freedoms that will undermine the nation and lead to the destruction of liberty.

  33. #29
    I hope he doesn't run... it would split the libertarian vote between the two of them...
    It's all about taking action and not being lazy. So you do the work, whether it's fitness or whatever. It's about getting up, motivating yourself and just doing it.
    - Kim Kardashian

    Donald Trump / Crenshaw 2024!!!!

    My pronouns are he/him/his

  34. #30

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Rand Paul on Lindsey Graham
    By opinionatedfool in forum Rand Paul Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-17-2015, 04:15 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-21-2015, 02:43 PM
  3. Lindsey Graham is running against Ron Paul
    By Brian4Liberty in forum Ron Paul Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-09-2014, 04:07 PM
  4. Sen. Lindsey Graham: Condi Rice Should Run for President
    By TaftFan in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-21-2014, 02:28 AM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-07-2013, 11:43 PM

Select a tag for more discussion on that topic

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •