Walgreens liable for employees big mouth $1.4M

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Until you post your "all other evidence",....

I guess you STILL haven't noticed that your posts are the evidence.

I won't agree with your conclusion here just yet.

Oh look, another perp pretending that he's the judge.

That doesn't mean I always am [trolling],...

At first, you named only three categories of people you belittle, including conspiracy theorists and hyperinflationists. I've now posted five more of your trolling threads, with different categories. Keep moving the goalposts.

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Because I don't know your real name.

You don't need someone's real name to turn them in. You said you worked in a law office and said you have prosecutors friends, so I would assume you know that.

[PRB]

I guess you STILL haven't noticed that your posts are the evidence.

Or, more accurately, I don't agree and admit that counts as evidence.

Oh look, another perp pretending that he's the judge.

Because accusers are always right.

At first, you named only three categories of people you belittle, including conspiracy theorists and hyperinflationists. I've now posted five more of your trolling threads, with different categories. Keep moving the goalposts.

You're conflating trolling with belittling. Nice slick move here, thinking I won't notice?

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

...thinking I won't notice?

You keep thinking I'm writing this for you. Fine; keep on talking, loose lips.

[Verdictcorrect]

I wish someone would reply to me verdict correct on my question. There have been many following posts but all seem like arguments. I would love y'all's opinion on the matter I posted about the hospital nurse and her disclosure of mental moms phi for court hearing.

[tod evans]

I wish someone would reply to me verdict correct on my question. There have been many following posts but all seem like arguments. I would love y'all's opinion on the matter I posted about the hospital nurse and her disclosure of mental moms phi for court hearing.

Try to compose your original post in a manner that follows a logical train of thought and it's likely you'll get a response or two.

All I was able to come away with was that you agreed with the verdict.

[LibForestPaul]

I doubt Walgreens was in on it. Why in the hell would they risk litigation for a stupid love triangle? I think the pharmacist knew exactly what she was doing and she should be the one held accountable.

A pharmacist, who went through four years of undergrad, and four years of doctoral study, at a state approved college, and obtained a state license to practice her trade, how could she know, without a one hour training session, that patient data is to be kept private.

[tod evans]

A pharmacist, who went through four years of undergrad, and four years of doctoral study, at a state approved college, and obtained a state license to practice her trade, how could she know, without a one hour training session, that patient data is to be kept private.

You've made a great case for pharmacist liability......

[LibForestPaul]

You've made a great case for pharmacist liability......

More curious why the state is allowing people without this knowledge obtain professional license. Seems negligent, but what do I know.