5 Seniors Die after Flu Shot at Assisted Care Center in Georgia

[donnay]

5 Seniors Die after Flu Shot at Assisted Care Center in Georgia


Hope Assisted Living & Memory Care center near Atlanta Georgia. Image Source.

Health Impact News

Health Impact News has just received urgent information from health care workers at Hope Assisted Living & Memory Care in Dacula, Georgia. According to our informants, on Friday November 7, 2014, all the residents received flu vaccinations. They all reportedly developed a fever immediately, and within one week, five of the residents died.

According to its website, Hope Assisted Living & Memory Care specializes in Alzheimer’s and Dementia care. Our sources indicate that 5 fatalities in one week is extremely unusual, as the center “maybe loses a couple of people every 6 months or longer to Alzheimers.” One source stated to Health Impact News:

The facility is not saying they are related to the flu shot but we all know they are, and they know they are.

Healthcare workers across the U.S. fear to speak out against injuries due to vaccines, as it usually costs them their job. If you know anyone with family members at this facility near Atlanta Georgia, please demand an investigation immediately.

Hope Assisted Living & Memory Care

Some facts about the flu shot:

The flu shot is the most dangerous and deadly vaccine in the United States due to payouts from the National Vaccine Compensation program for injuries and vaccine deaths. (See: Victims Crippled and Killed by the Flu Shot Compensated by U.S. Government.)
According to the National Vaccine Information Center (NIVC), the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) received a massive 93,000 reports of adverse reactions following last year’s flu vaccine. These included 1,080 deaths and 8,888 hospitalizations.
The Fluzone flu vaccine marketed to seniors last year revealed 23 seniors died during drug trial in its package insert (See: 23 Seniors Died After Receiving Flu Shot Sold by Pharmacies.)

UPDATE: Local media in Atlanta has contacted us and are interested in interviewing family members of those who died at Hope Assisted Living & Memory Care last week. If you are a family member of a resident at Hope Center that has suffered or died since last week’s flu shot, please contact us.

Hope Assisted Living & Memory Care is now publicly threatening their own employees with legal action on their Facebook Page:


We notice in their public statement that they are not denying there was a flu shot given, or that there were 5 deaths last week. (UPDATE: They have apparently removed their Facebook Page now.)

Continued...

[Zippyjuan]

The flu shot is the most dangerous and deadly vaccine in the United States due to payouts from the National Vaccine Compensation program for injuries and vaccine deaths.

Payouts caused flu shot deaths?

According to the National Vaccine Information Center (NIVC), the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) received a massive 93,000 reports of adverse reactions following last year’s flu vaccine. These included 1,080 deaths and 8,888 hospitalizations.

VAERS incident reports are voluntary and reported reactions are not verified and are not necessarily due to a vaccine.

The Fluzone flu vaccine marketed to seniors last year revealed 23 seniors died during drug trial in its package insert (See: 23 Seniors Died After Receiving Flu Shot Sold by Pharmacies.)

No, it doesn't. From the insert:

Within 6 months post-vaccination, 93 (7.4%) Fluzone recipients experienced a serious adverse
20 event (N=1260). No deaths were reported within 28 days post-vaccination.

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Biologi.../UCM305089.pdf

According to the National Vaccine Information Center (NIVC), the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) received a massive 93,000 reports of adverse reactions following last year’s flu vaccine. These included 1,080 deaths and 8,888 hospitalizations.

Those figures were not just for one year but a sum of all reports ever made up to November, 2013. http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-dis...Influenza.aspx and note again that VAERS reports can be made by anybody (even you and I) and are not verified. 93,000 is three times more than the total annual VAERS reports filed for ALL medicines and vaccines.

https://vaers.hhs.gov/about/index

VAERS receives around 30,000 reports annually, with 13% classified as serious (e.g., associated with disability, hospitalization, life-threatening illness or death) (CDC VAERS Master Search Tool, April 2, 2008). Since 1990, VAERS has received over 200,000 reports, most of which describe mild side effects such as fever. Very rarely, people experience serious adverse events following immunization. By monitoring such events, VAERS helps to identify any important new safety concerns and thereby assists in ensuring that the benefits of vaccines continue to be far greater than the risks.

Many different types of adverse events occur after vaccination. About 85-90% of the reports describe mild adverse events such as fever, local reactions, and episodes of crying or mild irritability. The remaining reports reflect serious adverse events involving life-threatening conditions, hospitalization, permanent disability, or death, which may or may not have been caused by a vaccine.

From their FAQs:

Are all adverse events reported to VAERS caused by vaccines?


No. VAERS receives reports of many adverse events that occur after vaccination. Some occur coincidentally following vaccination, while others may be caused by vaccination. Studies help determine if a vaccine really caused an adverse event. Just because an adverse event happened after a person received a vaccine does not mean the vaccine caused the adverse event. Other factors, such as the person's medical history and other medicines the person took near the time of the vaccination, may have caused the adverse event. It is important to remember that many adverse events reported to VAERS may not be caused by vaccines. Although VAERS can rarely provide definitive evidence of causal associations between vaccines and particular risks, its unique role as a national spontaneous reporting system enables the early detection of signals that can then be more rigorously investigated.

[TheCount]

Correlation is not causation.

[Zippyjuan]

The facility is not saying they are related to the flu shot but we all know they are, and they know they are.

That is some powerful proof there!

[torchbearer]

I survived mine. jussaying.

[Zippyjuan]

Not even a arm falling off? You must have been lucky if the horror stories are true!

[torchbearer]

Not even a arm falling off? You must have been lucky if the horror stories are true!

They told me I might be sore, but I was 'sorely' disappointed.

[FindLiberty]

I think all the hyperbole and BS around getting the Flu/Flu Shot controversy is giving me flu-like symptoms.

Why can't they just spit out some hard or estimated "Flu Shot Study" numbers for a particular year?

I'm confused (that's not unusual for me), but maybe the data could be presented something like this:


In the year _______, how many people were living or hiding within the USofA? [# = 100% of total US population]

Within that year, how many people had died from the flu (or maybe the flu shot)? [# = % of total US population]

Within that year, how many people died of old age or other non-flu medical cause? [# = % of total US population]

Within that same year, how many people were born, immigrated or just appeared? [# = % of total US population]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In that same fateful year, v---- (below, an upper Age Range example might be from 60 to 125 years old)

How many people ALIVE in the US were in this ___-___ "Flu Study" age range? [# / % of total US population]

How many in that targeted age range were sampled/tracked for this "Study" data? [# / % of total "age range" population]

How many in that sampled/tracked group caught the flu (and lived/recovered)? [# / % of total in "sample/tracked group"]

How many in that sampled/tracked group didn't get the flu (ignore simple "colds")? [# / % of total in "sample/tracked group"]

Of all the people sampled/tracked, how many of them received a flu shot? [# / % of total in the sample/tracked age range]

Of those that received the flu shot, how many of them died from the flu (or shot)? [# / % of total in the vaccinated sample]

Of those that received the flu shot, how many of them died from something else? [# / % of total in the vaccinated sample]

Of all the people sampled/tracked, how many of them did not get a flu shot? [# / % of total in the sample/tracked age range]

Of those who did not get a flu shot, how many of them died from the flu? [# / % of total in the unvaccinated sample]

Of those who did not get a flu shot, how many of them died from something else? [# / % of total in the unvaccinated sample]

Of all the people sampled/tracked, how many were still alive at the year's end? [# / % of total in the sample/tracked age range]


Does my example make any sense, indicate any trends, or does it just kill the brain
of anyone who reads it?

IDK, my hunch is that the percentages are so small and close that no clear
conclusions can be reached, even if the data was accurate and unbiased.

Flu shots might prevent/cause illness and/or kill/save lives, it's partial luck!

[Working Poor]

Flu Shot Soup