Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 210 of 295

Thread: GMO labeling on the Ballot in Oregon

  1. #181
    5100 and some change in the vote total difference. Closing in as ballots are counted.

    Yes 738,323 49.83%
    No 743,505 50.17%

    Gonna get jiggy now...

    Contested votes (only) by county minus those which have been remedied thus far...

    Multnomah 2956
    Lane 1573
    Washington 1570
    Clackamas 1129
    Jackson 838
    Marion 810
    des Chutes 586
    Josephine 404
    Linn 322
    Yamhill 316
    Douglas 243
    Benton 187
    Coos 167
    Polk 152
    Klamath 143
    Lincoln 118
    Umatilla 109
    Tillamook 96
    Columbia 81
    Hood River 64
    Union 59
    Curry 44
    Wasco 42
    Clatsop 33
    Jefferson 30
    Crook 26
    Baker 16
    Grant 11
    Lake 5
    Harney 4
    Morrow 3
    Wallowa 3
    Wheeler 1


    Yes No Total
    Baker 2,313 32.16% 4,879 67.84% 7,192
    Benton 19,431 52.10% 17,862 47.90% 37,293
    Clackamas 73,943 46.97% 83,491 53.03% 157,434
    Clatsop 7,174 50.45% 7,046 49.55% 14,220
    Columbia 9,097 45.18% 11,040 54.82% 20,137
    Coos 10,977 45.93% 12,924 54.07% 23,901
    Crook 2,819 31.13% 6,237 68.87% 9,056
    Curry 5,132 52.44% 4,655 47.56% 9,787
    Deschutes 31,583 46.40% 36,490 53.60% 68,073
    Douglas 16,778 40.65% 24,494 59.35% 41,272
    Gilliam 211 23.37% 692 76.63% 903
    Grant 1,040 31.52% 2,260 68.48% 3,300
    Harney 791 26.35% 2,211 73.65% 3,002
    Hood River 4,487 53.59% 3,886 46.41% 8,373
    Jackson 44,418 54.99% 36,354 45.01% 80,772
    Jefferson 2,234 32.31% 4,680 67.69% 6,914
    Josephine 16,503 48.85% 17,277 51.15% 33,780
    Klamath 8,278 36.13% 14,632 63.87% 22,910
    Lake 938 29.12% 2,283 70.88% 3,221
    Lane 84,728 57.60% 62,378 42.40% 147,106
    Lincoln 10,387 52.70% 9,321 47.30% 19,708
    Linn 16,362 37.60% 27,159 62.40% 43,521
    Malheur 2,395 31.60% 5,183 68.40% 7,578
    Marion 42,712 41.66% 59,811 58.34% 102,523
    Morrow 853 26.87% 2,322 73.13% 3,175
    Multnomah 181,207 62.41% 109,122 37.59% 290,329
    Polk 12,803 41.82% 17,815 58.18% 30,618
    Sherman 205 22.70% 698 77.30% 903
    Tillamook 4,806 44.77% 5,930 55.23% 10,736
    Umatilla 6,029 31.70% 12,987 68.30% 19,016
    Union 3,382 32.70% 6,961 67.30% 10,343
    Wallowa 1,294 35.58% 2,343 64.42% 3,637
    Wasco 3,645 39.62% 5,556 60.38% 9,201
    Washington 93,698 48.31% 100,267 51.69% 193,965
    Wheeler 229 32.21% 482 67.79% 711
    Yamhill 15,441 41.49% 21,777 58.51% 37,218
    Totals: 738,323 49.83% 743,505 50.17% 1,481,828
    Last edited by Natural Citizen; 11-13-2014 at 11:46 PM.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #182
    Wow! That's amazingly close to my projection! (post #128) Looks like I'm going to be even more accurate than I thought.
    I have an autographed copy of Revolution: A Manifesto for sale. Mint condition, inquire within. (I don't sign in often, so please allow plenty of time for a response)

  4. #183
    Quote Originally Posted by invisible View Post
    Wow! That's amazingly close to my projection! (post #128) Looks like I'm going to be even more accurate than I thought.
    The remaining votes to be tallied may be majority YES. Will be close, for sure. Phone calling is in overdrive with regard to those contested ballots. Transporting people if need be. People are on it. Funds are sufficient so that it may continue. Will see how it pans out.
    Last edited by Natural Citizen; 11-14-2014 at 01:29 AM.

  5. #184
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural Citizen View Post
    The remaining votes to be tallied may be majority YES. Will be close, for sure. Phone calling is in overdrive with regard to those contested ballots. Transporting people if need be. People are on it. Funds are sufficient so that it may continue. Will see how it pans out.
    I don't claim to be an expert on statistical matters, but it seems intuitive to me that the remaining votes will tend to have a yes / no distribution that closely follows the totals for the county they came from, just as my original projection did. I'm not so sure that people voting one particular way would be any more or less inclined to verify their contested ballots. I think which counties have more or less of their ballots completely thrown out will make more difference, again because this will follow the percentage of the vote totals in each county.
    I have an autographed copy of Revolution: A Manifesto for sale. Mint condition, inquire within. (I don't sign in often, so please allow plenty of time for a response)



  6. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  7. #185
    Quote Originally Posted by parocks View Post
    Whether it's God, or Evolution, that made potatoes the way they are, humans were created, or evolved, to eat potatoes without bacteria genes in them.

    Nobody has any idea about any of the weird stuff that happens to humans from eating something that is very similar to actual food, but is different in quite significant ways.

    We have no idea what effect this "food" has on us or on other animals or plants. It's hurting us.
    GMO's screws with our DNA and genetic expression. The Biotechs are playing God and the people have done just fine without these evil corporations molesting our foods. When I say, "MonSatan" I really mean it.
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  8. #186
    Its interesting to see the Paulites struggle with their hatred for government and love for transparency.

  9. #187
    Quote Originally Posted by invisible View Post
    I don't claim to be an expert on statistical matters, but it seems intuitive to me that the remaining votes will tend to have a yes / no distribution that closely follows the totals for the county they came from, just as my original projection did. I'm not so sure that people voting one particular way would be any more or less inclined to verify their contested ballots. I think which counties have more or less of their ballots completely thrown out will make more difference, again because this will follow the percentage of the vote totals in each county.
    Well. We get to be a bit selective at this point in the game, invisible. Agreed on your points, though.

  10. #188
    Quote Originally Posted by invisible View Post
    I don't claim to be an expert on statistical matters, but it seems intuitive to me that the remaining votes will tend to have a yes / no distribution that closely follows the totals for the county they came from, just as my original projection did.
    Looks like some of these counties which had previously been majority NO are changing to majority YES. Will update those numbers a little later.

  11. #189
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural Citizen View Post
    Looks like some of these counties which had previously been majority NO are changing to majority YES. Will update those numbers a little later.
    Interesting, TY. I look forward to your updates.
    I have an autographed copy of Revolution: A Manifesto for sale. Mint condition, inquire within. (I don't sign in often, so please allow plenty of time for a response)

  12. #190
    Quote Originally Posted by invisible View Post
    Interesting, TY. I look forward to your updates.
    Some relevant reading while we wait for some of these...


    Among their fellow non-party voters, 1.2 percent either forgot to sign their ballots or had signatures that didn't match their registration card.

    In second place, Independents had 1.1 percent, Democrats with .07 percent and Republicans with .06 percent.

    A new law allows the problem ballot list to be publicly released before the deadline passes and allows campaign representatives to call you and urge you to fix issues and be counted. Campaign representatives also may offer to drive voters to elections offices, though they're not allowed to pressure them on their votes on the way.
    Are you on the list? Elections offices release names of Oregon voters with problem ballots
    Last edited by Natural Citizen; 11-14-2014 at 08:23 PM.

  13. #191
    Quote Originally Posted by invisible View Post
    Plugging these new numbers into my spreadsheet as per post #86, my projection now looks like:
    yes - 738277 = 49.85%
    no - 742799 = 50.15%
    Currently...

    Yes 740,917 49.85%
    No 745,456 50.15%

    Very good grasshoppa.

    More to count as we move toward the 18th deadline...
    Last edited by Natural Citizen; 11-14-2014 at 07:43 PM.

  14. #192
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural Citizen View Post
    Currently...

    Yes 740,917 49.85%
    No 745,456 50.15%

    Very good grasshoppa.

    More to count as we move toward the 18th deadline...
    But if some of the "no" counties are now swinging towards "yes", and the difference is something like 1% of the county's vote total (at least that's how I read post #190 - and you forgot the link btw, so no idea where that came from), that should be more than enough to throw the final result to more than 50% yes. But of course, the presentation of the numbers is still confusing enough to make any sort of accurate projection impossible at this point. When that first 1000 votes got mysteriously added to the no total, I entered that into my spreadsheet just to see what happened, and it changed the final result by something like .08%, so a couple thousand more yes votes will tip the balance.
    I have an autographed copy of Revolution: A Manifesto for sale. Mint condition, inquire within. (I don't sign in often, so please allow plenty of time for a response)



  15. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  16. #193
    Quote Originally Posted by invisible View Post
    When that first 1000 votes got mysteriously added to the no total, I entered that into my spreadsheet just to see what happened, and it changed the final result by something like .08%, so a couple thousand more yes votes will tip the balance.
    Yep. That erroneous 1000 vote addition to NO was caught and subsequently removed, thankfully. I'm keeping my battle helmet on just in case.

    Sorry for not linking to that snippet in the earlier post. I never forget to source what I share here. Was incompetence on my part. It was from an online newspaper in Oregon. I'll have to try remember which one and go look for it and then I'll add it to post 190.

  17. #194
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural Citizen View Post
    Yep. That erroneous 1000 vote addition to NO was caught and subsequently removed, thankfully. I'm keeping my battle helmet on just in case.

    Sorry for not linking to that snippet in the earlier post. I never forget to source what I share here. Was incompetence on my part. It was from an online newspaper in Oregon. I'll have to try remember which one and go look for it and then I'll add it to post 190.
    Oh, I didn't think you quoted something inaccurately, or anything like that. I just would find the article interesting to read!
    I have an autographed copy of Revolution: A Manifesto for sale. Mint condition, inquire within. (I don't sign in often, so please allow plenty of time for a response)

  18. #195
    Quote Originally Posted by invisible View Post
    Oh, I didn't think you quoted something inaccurately, or anything like that. I just would find the article interesting to read!
    Yes, I know that you didn't. I added a link to the thing in post 190, btw. Speaking off the record, it could be considered reasonable for one to wonder if the No On 92 folks may have had some people working in some of these critical counties and questioning the signatures on the ballots of the YES On 92 Demographic. I only mention this because of the number of contested votes in particular counties. Again, I'm mentioning this off the record but it certainly would be reasonable for one to consider the phenomenon given the percentage of remedied YES votes of contested ballots.
    Last edited by Natural Citizen; 11-16-2014 at 12:54 AM.

  19. #196
    Quote Originally Posted by invisible View Post
    ...a couple thousand more yes votes will tip the balance.
    Looking better. Nobody is paying attention.
    Last edited by Natural Citizen; 11-16-2014 at 12:36 AM.

  20. #197
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural Citizen View Post
    Looking better. Nobody is paying attention.
    What do you mean? Who is not paying attention, to what?
    I have an autographed copy of Revolution: A Manifesto for sale. Mint condition, inquire within. (I don't sign in often, so please allow plenty of time for a response)

  21. #198
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    GMO's screws with our DNA and genetic expression. The Biotechs are playing God and the people have done just fine without these evil corporations molesting our foods. When I say, "MonSatan" I really mean it.
    God clearly and plainly gave us dominion over the plants and the animals. You're such a keen researcher - how did you miss that?

    The human genome has been mapped, go look for yourself and see what percentage of genes have genetically transferred from plants. Scientists aren't worried about horizontal gene transfer. And it was happening long before GMO foods were introduced to the world.

    You're not going to start expressing the genes that were inserted/modified because you eat GMOs. Changes in your nutrient intake may cause changes in expression, some of which may be persistent, but everything you eat “can change your DNA” in that sense. Diet is and always has been one of environmental factors that affect genetic expression. But unless you're ingesting pure plutonium or nitrous acid, it's not altering your genome, but its expression.

    Next life, try to make it past 8th grade.

  22. #199
    Quote Originally Posted by parocks View Post
    We have no idea what effect this "food" has on us or on other animals or plants. It's hurting us.
    No it isn't. In our diets every day for an entire generation now, not one disease or illness linked to it. Although I do believe I could make the case that eating organic makes people into simpletons.

  23. #200
    It speaks largely to the ability of the leftists to poll correctly when every single poll shows 85 - 90% of voters support labeling, yet it almost always fails miserably at the ballot box, even in the cherry-picked proving grounds of liberalism. Science is hard.

    They can't get this nonsense passed in Washington and California? *snicker*

    Now I suppose one of our regulars will come and direly warn us that it doesn't matter anyway - there is some wave of something coming to take over regardless. Because freedom.
    Last edited by angelatc; 11-16-2014 at 03:13 AM.



  24. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  25. #201
    Quote Originally Posted by angelatc View Post
    It speaks largely to the ability of the leftists to poll correctly when every single poll shows 85 - 90% of voters support labeling, yet it almost always fails miserably at the ballot box, even in the cherry-picked proving grounds of liberalism. Science is hard.

    They can't get this nonsense passed in Washington and California? *snicker*

    Now I suppose one of our regulars will come and direly warn us that it doesn't matter anyway - there is some wave of something coming to take over regardless. Because freedom.
    If you believe that eliminating fraud is strictly a liberal issue, would you like to buy some "fudge"?
    I have an autographed copy of Revolution: A Manifesto for sale. Mint condition, inquire within. (I don't sign in often, so please allow plenty of time for a response)

  26. #202
    Quote Originally Posted by angelatc View Post
    God clearly and plainly gave us dominion over the plants and the animals. You're such a keen researcher - how did you miss that?

    The human genome has been mapped, go look for yourself and see what percentage of genes have genetically transferred from plants. Scientists aren't worried about horizontal gene transfer. And it was happening long before GMO foods were introduced to the world.

    You're not going to start expressing the genes that were inserted/modified because you eat GMOs. Changes in your nutrient intake may cause changes in expression, some of which may be persistent, but everything you eat “can change your DNA” in that sense. Diet is and always has been one of environmental factors that affect genetic expression. But unless you're ingesting pure plutonium or nitrous acid, it's not altering your genome, but its expression.

    Next life, try to make it past 8th grade.
    Exogenous plant MIR168a specifically targets mammalian LDLRAP1: evidence of cross-kingdom regulation by microRNA
    http://www.nature.com/cr/journal/v22...r2011158a.html

    Growing fatter on a GM diet
    http://sciencenordic.com/growing-fatter-gm-diet

    Scientists: New GMO wheat may 'silence' vital human genes
    http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/332822

    Complete Genes May Pass from Food to Human Blood
    http://www.plosone.org/article/info%...l.pone.0069805

    The Very Real Danger of Genetically Modified Foods
    http://www.theatlantic.com/health/ar...-foods/251051/

    Genetically modified wheat potentially silence our genes
    http://www.inbi.canterbury.ac.nz/Doc...t-20120828.pdf

    Scientists discover double meaning in genetic code
    http://www.washington.edu/news/2013/...-genetic-code/

    Confirmed: DNA From Genetically Modified Crops Can Be Transferred Into Humans Who Eat Them
    http://livefreelivenatural.com/confi....T66yOeAF.dpuf

    Ten Scientific Studies Prove that Genetically Modified Food Can Be Harmful To Human Health
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/ten-sci...health/5377054

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=zvgmV8MGrAU

    I don't know about you, but I am not comfortable being a lab rat. I rather let nature take it's course not MonSATAN.

    Hosea 4:6
    "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children."
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  27. #203
    Quote Originally Posted by invisible View Post
    What do you mean? Who is not paying attention, to what?
    Oh. I'm sorry, invisible. I was kind of just typing to myself there. Heh. What I meant was that I've read many, many recent articles where the authors have said that the bill has failed and what they do is follow that line with "So then the question becomes..."

    Of course we know that questions don't become anything even if this particular citizens initiative happens to not pass. Questions don't go away. But there is a silly phenomenon that we have where we just listen to the news and when they tell us it's over, then, by gosh, it must be over. And so we stop paying attention. I suppose that I was thinking more along the lines of our professionals in journalism. Many just write it up and call it a day.

    Comparable to what I had shared with PRB in post #151, I suppose.

  28. #204
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    E

    I don't know about you, but I am not comfortable being a lab rat. I rather let nature take it's course not MonSATAN.

    Hosea 4:6
    "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children."
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    E

    I don't know about you, but I am not comfortable being a lab rat. I rather let nature take it's course not MonSATAN.
    You've got a new juevenile catch phrase to go along with big pHARMa and all the others you cling to. How very liberal of you. Actually though, I love it - it only underscores that you're an ideologue through and through, not interested in facts, only using these forums to further your personal agenda of expanding government and restricting free markets.

    17 years in the food supply and not a single health incident. Nada, none, zip. Nobody suing because GMOs gave them the morgellons or gluten intolerance. Not a single lawsuit? In America? Go figure.

    The fact remains that the free market is always a better tool to decide these things. Nobody cares what you want and nobody shoudl have to hear it day after day after day. Go graze, go eat organic, and leave my damned food alone.

    Hosea 4:6
    "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge,
    *Snort* Says the high school dropout who would rather see children in Africa die from starvation and go blind rather than let them eat Golden Rice? Or is "Ignorance is intelligence!" some deep liberal Orwellian philosophy? I mean, you guys don't have to trust the scientists, but unless you can either disprove the entire scientific method, or produce something that resembles an iota of proof of your hypothesis, that's all you have. A hypothesis, which is unsupported by anything resembling evidence. Which makes it a flawed hypothesis. As in - there is no evidence that horizontal gene transfers are any more or less "dangerous!!!!" than vertical gene transfers.

    Gen. 1:28) "
    “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth."
    (Gen. 1:26) “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth"

    (Psalm 8
    4.What is man that You are mindful of him, And the son of man that You visit him?
    5.For You have made him a little lower than the angels, And You have crowned him with glory and honor.
    6.You have made him to have dominion over the works of Your hands; You have put all things under his feet...

    So the people in these forums screeching that GMOs are dangerous and bad, simply because they are not smart enough to understand basic science are here doing Satan's work. Either they're intentionally evil, driven by only by their own self interest, or he has made them into blind tools.
    Last edited by angelatc; 11-16-2014 at 01:57 PM.

  29. #205
    Current ballot count has yet to be released. Most recently...

    Yes 740,917 49.85%
    No 745,456 50.15%


    Aside - 2 developers sue Hawaii county to halt GMO law

    Previously...Maui GMO ban passes


    The first ballots to be counted show 58 percent of voters oppose the ban. But, by the third printout, there were 50 percent "yes" votes. It appears that the initiative has passed.

    Maui is home to farms owned by national companies like Monsanto and a Dow Chemical subsidiary, which produce new varieties of genetically engineered seeds


    If one reflects on this lawsuit and others that will certainly follow as the people introduce more of these citizens initiatives, it begs the question of the rule of law. Is justice something that is to be purchased without deliberation? And what of the courts and so called unbiased judges who dispense it? We know much of the revolving door that exists within these companies, the courts and government bodies. The phenomenon that we see with regard to these companies and major block/share holders (yet to be known) who use patent law to undermine the ability of the people to grow and eat what they want in a way that stimulates control of the food supply in their corrporate socialist/mercantilist favor could be said to be a direct contradiction of the old endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness gag. We like to think that America is a Republic but this is a phenomenon that only resides on paper it would seem.

    But I digress. Is a debate for another day and I suppose that I ask it here given debate that we see in some recent postings from the evangelical community with regard to "life". At the moment it's important to focus on the subject here, which, of course, would be the peoples right to know what they consume. To participate in a genuine free market system where a mechanism for choice exists and freedom to choose establishes the winners and losers. Mercantilist infrastructure that we have at the moment in the way that was described here actually protects these industries from the free market. And spending $25 million from out of state to oppose a citizens initiative for a right to know and make an informed choice is demonstrative of this mercantilist model.
    Last edited by Natural Citizen; 11-16-2014 at 08:37 PM.

  30. #206
    Quote Originally Posted by angelatc View Post
    No it isn't. In our diets every day for an entire generation now, not one disease or illness linked to it. Although I do believe I could make the case that eating organic makes people into simpletons.
    Quote Originally Posted by angelatc View Post
    You've got a new juevenile catch phrase to go along with big pHARMa and all the others you cling to. How very liberal of you. Actually though, I love it - it only underscores that you're an ideologue through and through, not interested in facts, only using these forums to further your personal agenda of expanding government and restricting free markets.

    17 years in the food supply and not a single health incident. Nada, none, zip. Nobody suing because GMOs gave them the morgellons or gluten intolerance. Not a single lawsuit? In America? Go figure.
    [...]
    *Snort* Says the high school dropout who would rather see children in Africa die from starvation and go blind rather than let them eat Golden Rice? Or is "Ignorance is intelligence!" some deep liberal Orwellian philosophy? I mean, you guys don't have to trust the scientists, but unless you can either disprove the entire scientific method, or produce something that resembles an iota of proof of your hypothesis, that's all you have. A hypothesis, which is unsupported by anything resembling evidence. Which makes it a flawed hypothesis. As in - there is no evidence that horizontal gene transfers are any more or less "dangerous!!!!" than vertical gene transfers.
    [...]
    So the people in these forums screeching that GMOs are dangerous and bad, simply because they are not smart enough to understand basic science are here doing Satan's work. Either they're intentionally evil, driven by only by their own self interest, or he has made them into blind tools.
    I'd love to see you go tell Taleb what an unscientific dumbass and tool of Satan he is: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...id=13012333374

    See you on your next drive-by!
    Based on the idea of natural rights, government secures those rights to the individual by strictly negative intervention, making justice costless and easy of access; and beyond that it does not go. The State, on the other hand, both in its genesis and by its primary intention, is purely anti-social. It is not based on the idea of natural rights, but on the idea that the individual has no rights except those that the State may provisionally grant him. It has always made justice costly and difficult of access, and has invariably held itself above justice and common morality whenever it could advantage itself by so doing.
    --Albert J. Nock

  31. #207
    .3% separates the YES ballots from the NO ballots. Out of state companies who had spent millions of dollars to oppose this citizens initiative scrambling to make sure that Contested NO ballots are being remedied. Heh...
    Last edited by Natural Citizen; 11-17-2014 at 01:52 PM.

  32. #208
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural Citizen View Post
    .3% separates the YES ballots from the NO ballots. Out of state companies who had spent millions of dollars to oppose this citizens initiative scrambling to make sure that Contested NO ballots are being remedied. Heh...
    Still the same count and percentages given in post #205, then?
    I have an autographed copy of Revolution: A Manifesto for sale. Mint condition, inquire within. (I don't sign in often, so please allow plenty of time for a response)



  33. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  34. #209
    Quote Originally Posted by invisible View Post
    Still the same count and percentages given in post #205, then?
    No update until probably this evening on official count. .3 % was the last official update which was prior to the weekend. The purpose of that last posting was just to mention that the NO folks are now scrambling to remedy the contested NO ballats. Something they had neglected. It just felt kind of naked to not share some sort of number.

    As was mentioned .2% renders an automatic recount. Anything outside of .2% would need to be funded.
    Last edited by Natural Citizen; 11-17-2014 at 02:18 PM.

  35. #210
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural Citizen View Post
    .3% separates the YES ballots from the NO ballots. Out of state companies who had spent millions of dollars to oppose this citizens initiative scrambling to make sure that Contested NO ballots are being remedied. Heh...
    why you no liek free speech and free market?
    pcosmar's lie : There are more votes than registered Voters..

Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. GMO labeling to qualify for WA. ballot
    By RPfan1992 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-21-2013, 09:30 AM
  2. OREGON: Powerful Group Aims Marijuana Measure at 2014 Ballot
    By presence in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-31-2013, 10:12 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-26-2010, 12:09 PM
  4. Is Ron On Oregon Ballot??
    By sharkcity in forum Oregon
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-01-2008, 07:50 AM

Select a tag for more discussion on that topic

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •