Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 5% Propylene Glycol: Europe Recalls Tainted Whiskey; Ships to US for Sale?

  1. #1

    5% Propylene Glycol: Europe Recalls Tainted Whiskey; Ships to US for Sale?

    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/antifre...ry?id=26574180
    How an Antifreeze Ingredient Led to a Whiskey Recall in Europe

    Oct 30, 2014, 4:10 PM ET
    By GILLIAN MOHNEY Gillian Mohney More from Gillian »
    Digital Reporter





    via Good Morning America






    A bottle of Fireball Whisky is pictured.
    @FireballWhisky/Twitter










    The overseas recall of a batch of U.S. whiskey imported to three Scandinavian countries has focused new attention on an ingredient that has long been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in foods and beverage.


    The issue arose after Finland, Sweden and Norway asked the makers of Fireball whiskey to recall a batch of the liquor that contained a higher amount of the FDA-approved ingredient propylene glycol than is allowed under European regulations, according to a statement from Metairie, Louisiana-based Sazerac, the makers of Fireball.


    While the ingredient is also used in nonedible products including antifreeze, it is considered “generally recognized as safe” by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to be used in food and beverages.



    Motoko Mukai, a principal research scientist at the Department of Food Science at Cornell University, explained that there are different kinds of antifreeze and that the antifreeze that contains propylene glycol is less toxic and more environmentally safe than antifreeze that contains ethylene glycol, which is toxic to humans.
    “I saw a lot of media that it’s found in antifreeze; [propylene glycol] is found in environmentally friendly antifreeze,” she said.
    Mukai said there are limits on the amount of propylene glycol that can be used in foods and liquors, but that it would be extremely difficult to ingest too much of the chemical through food or drink.
    For example, Mukai points out in liquor the chemical can make up to just 50 grams for each kilogram of liquid, or 5 percent. So, she said before a person would get sick from consuming a dangerous amount of the chemical, they would likely get sick from alcohol poisoning.
    Propylene glycol toxicity has only been reported in rare and unusual circumstances including intravenous medications containing propylene glycol and with topically applied medications using the chemical, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    In addition to alcohol, the product is often used in small amounts ice cream, candy and seasonings, Mukai said.
    Sazerac, which makes Fireball whiskey, has defended its product, saying it is “absolutely safe to drink and the use of [propylene glycol] in Fireball creates no health risk whatsoever.”
    The chemical is used as a flavoring ingredient in its whiskey and is used in very small quantities, less than one-eighth of the amount allowed in the United States, the Sazerac group said.
    According to a post on their website, the North American-standard batch of whiskey in question was mistakenly sent to Finland, Sweden and Norway. The company was aware the liquor did not comply with European rules requiring less propylene glycol, a flavoring ingredient.
    Mukai said European regulations do not allow the same level of propylene glycol, which is why the liquor was recalled from three countries. The countries that asked for a recall permit a much lower amount of propylene glycol in their liquor products. She said it is common for companies to have different formulas for products, depending on local regulations.
    The European Union and the United States have different regulations for many chemicals used in common items, including Bisphenol A, which is common in plastics and phthalates, which are common in cosmetics.
    Finland, Sweden and Norway have asked Sazerac to recall the alcohol and send another batch specifically formulated to adhere to European regulations, according to the company website.
    An FDA representative confirmed that the ingredient is approved for use in certain foods and beverages. The chemical can be used for a variety of uses in foods including as a thickener and stabilizer and a flavor agent, according to the FDA website.

    'We endorse the idea of voluntarism; self-responsibility: Family, friends, and churches to solve problems, rather than saying that some monolithic government is going to make you take care of yourself and be a better person. It's a preposterous notion: It never worked, it never will. The government can't make you a better person; it can't make you follow good habits.' - Ron Paul 1988

    Awareness is the Root of Liberation Revolution is Action upon Revelation

    'Resistance and Disobedience in Economic Activity is the Most Moral Human Action Possible' - SEK3

    Flectere si nequeo superos, Acheronta movebo.

    ...the familiar ritual of institutional self-absolution...
    ...for protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment...




  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    A little more information on Propylene Glycol.


    (NaturalNews) Mention Propylene Glycol (PG) to most people and they will probably tell you that it is a toxin. On the other hand, PG comes in more than one formulation, so it needs to be clarified as to which formulation is meant.

    The real question is, does it make a difference which one is used, since it is used in everything from
    hydraulic and brake fluid to snack foods?

    The answer is: it does and it doesn't. It is a toxin regardless of which strength is used. Propylene Glycol is a form of mineral oil, an alcohol produced by fermentation of yeast and carbohydrates. This gives it the designation of carbohydrate when used in foods.

    Because it comes in several grades, PG has been used for a variety of uses. Industrial grade PG is used as an active ingredient in engine coolants and antifreeze; airplane de-icers; polyurethane cushions; paints, enamels and varnishes; and in many products as a solvent or surfactant. In all fairness, it should be stated that PG was only added to anti-freeze to replace Ethylene Glycol. It had been a problem because dogs often lap up puddles of anti-freeze.

    The form most pertinent to this article is the pharmaceutical grade. This is a much less concentrated form of PG and therefore less problematic. That being stated, it is also the controversial form due to its use in products that are either ingested or enter the body through application to the skin. It is commonly used as a solvent in oral, topical and injectable drug products as well as in foods.

    Though the controversy over PG wages on, it is not for lack of research. In fact many studies have been conducted, but results have been contradictory. Possibly this is because the concentration of PG in the formulation studied is not always readily apparent. Regardless, the government agencies involved have deemed it safe: The FDA includes Pharmaceutical grade PG on its Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) list. The World Health Organization also considers it as safe for use.

    Studies on dogs and rats, which were fed doses of PG ranging from two to five grams per kg of body weight per day, showed no links to cancer. The results satisfied the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel enough to conclude that there was no carcinogenic risk with low levels of ingestion of PG. A low level of PG was defined, and as a result, the panel recommended that only PG with a concentration less than 50% should be used in cosmetics.

    Though cancer might not be a concern, it was also found that PG provoked allergic reactions in patients with eczema and other skin allergies, even in formulations of much less than 50%.

    The Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) cites skin, liver and kidney damage that can result from contact with PG, and it gives safe handling instructions, calling it a hazardous substance. Though not specified, this is for the more concentrated industrial grade.

    On the other hand, studies done in vitro tests on mammalian cells revealed that some cells underwent
    mutation. Other research conducted twenty and thirty years ago documented toxic effects after repeated small doses of propylene glycol were ingested or repeatedly applied to the skin. Acute toxicity was found to follow I.V. injection of drugs dissolved in significant amounts of PG.

    In Europe, where the authorities are much more cautious about what is allowable in cosmetics and foods, propylene glycol is limited to mostly non-food uses. What food uses are allowed are very limited.

    The question comes down to more of a quantity issue. In small amounts, used infrequently, propylene glycol may not have negative health effects. If one wants to be on the safe side, though, there are alternatives.

    ...

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/023138_pr...#ixzz3Hjvbg9XR

  4. #3
    Propylene Glycol is also in e-cigarettes. It's also in Ice Cream. It's in a lot of foods in the US. It's also in a lot of toothpastes, deodorants and lotions.
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  5. #4
    The manufacturer says a mix-up caused US recipe whisky to be sent to Europe.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-29847999

    'We endorse the idea of voluntarism; self-responsibility: Family, friends, and churches to solve problems, rather than saying that some monolithic government is going to make you take care of yourself and be a better person. It's a preposterous notion: It never worked, it never will. The government can't make you a better person; it can't make you follow good habits.' - Ron Paul 1988

    Awareness is the Root of Liberation Revolution is Action upon Revelation

    'Resistance and Disobedience in Economic Activity is the Most Moral Human Action Possible' - SEK3

    Flectere si nequeo superos, Acheronta movebo.

    ...the familiar ritual of institutional self-absolution...
    ...for protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment...


  6. #5
    Propylene Glycol
    LD50/LC50:
    RTECS: CAS# 57-55-6: Draize test, rabbit, eye: 100 mg Mild; Draize test, rabbit, eye: 500 mg/24H Mild; Oral, mouse: LD50 = 22 gm/kg; Oral, mouse: LD50 = 20300 mg/kg; Oral, rabbit: LD50 = 18500 mg/kg; Oral, rat: LD50 = 20 gm/kg; Skin, rabbit: LD50 = 20800 mg/kg; Skin, rabbit: LD50 = 20800 mg/kg; .
    Carcinogenicity: Propylene glycol - Not listed as a carcinogen by ACGIH, IARC, NTP, or CA Prop 65.
    Other:
    Ecotoxicity:
    Standard Draize Test: Administration onto the skin (human) = 500 mg/7days (Mild). Standard Draize Test: Administration onto the skin (human) = 104 mg/3 days-Intermittent (Moderate).
    Section 12 - Ecological Information
    Water flea Daphnia: EC50 > 10000 mg/L; 48 Hr; Unspecified Bacteria: Phytobacterium phosphoreum: EC50 = 710 mg/L; 30 min; Microtox test Fish: Goldfish: LC50 > 5000 mg/L; 24 Hr; Unspecified Fish: Guppy: LC50 > 1000 mg/L; 48 Hr; Unspecified
    Ethanol
    LD50/LC50: CAS# 64-17-5: Draize test, rabbit, eye: 500 mg Severe; Draize test, rabbit, eye: 500 mg/24H Mild; Draize test, rabbit, skin: 20 mg/24H Moderate; Inhalation, mouse: LC50 = 39 gm/m3/4H; Inhalation, rat: LC50 = 20000 ppm/10H; Oral, mouse: LD50 = 3450 mg/kg; Oral, rabbit: LD50 = 6300 mg/kg; Oral, rat: LD50 = 9000 mg/kg; Oral, rat: LD50 = 7060 mg/kg;
    CAS# 7732-18-5: Oral, rat: LD50 = >90 mL/kg;
    Carcinogenicity:
    CAS# 64-17-5: ACGIH: A4 - Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen CAS# 7732-18-5: Not listed by ACGIH, IARC, NIOSH, NTP, or OSHA. Epidemiology: Ethanol has been shown to produce fetotoxicity in the embry o or fetus of laboratory animals. Prenatal exposure to ethanol is associated with a distinct pattern of co ngenital malformations that have collecetively been termed the "fetal alcohol syndrome". Teratogenicity: Oral, Human - woman: TDLo = 41 gm/kg (female 41 week(s) after conception) Effects on Newborn - Apgar score (human only) and Effects on Newborn - other neonatal measures or effects and Effects on Newborn - drug dependence. Reproductive Effects: Intrauterine, Human - woman: TDLo = 200 mg/kg (female 5 day(s) pre-mating) Fertility - female fertility index (e.g. # females pregnant per # sperm positive females; # females pregnant per # females mated). Neurotoxicity: No information available. Mutagenicity: DNA Inhibition: Human, Lymphocyte = 220 mmol/L.; Cytogenetic Analysis: Human, Lymphocyte = 1160
    Section 10 - Stability and Reactivity
    Section 11 - Toxicological Information
    Section 9 - Physical and Chemical Properties
    gm/L.; Cytogenetic Analysis: Human, Fibroblast = 12000 ppm.; Cytogenetic Analysis: Human, Leukocyte = 1 pph/72H
    gm/L.; Cytogenetic Analysis: Human, Fibroblast = 12000 ppm.; Cytogenetic Analysis: Human, Leukocyte = 1 pph/72H (Continuous).; Sister Chromatid Exchange: Human, Lymphocyte = 500 ppm/72H (Continuous). Other Studies: Standard Draize Test(Skin, rabbit) = 20 mg/24H (Moderate) S tandard Draize Test: Administration into the eye (rabbit) = 500 mg (Severe).
    It would not be too farfetched to claim that propylene glycol is as dangerous or less dangerous than ethanol. I am not making any such claims but the numbers above may suggest just that.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by luctor-et-emergo View Post
    Propylene Glycol


    Ethanol


    It would not be too farfetched to claim that propylene glycol is as dangerous or less dangerous than ethanol. I am not making any such claims but the numbers above may suggest just that.
    There's only one conclusion from those numbers - it is FAR less dangerous.

    It's under half the toxicity in all the comparisons, as well as present in much lower quantities (5% vs. about 40%).
    The enemy of my enemy may be worse than my enemy.

    I do not suffer from Trump Rearrangement Syndrome. Sorry if that triggers you.

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti-Neocon View Post
    There's only one conclusion from those numbers - it is FAR less dangerous.

    It's under half the toxicity in all the comparisons, as well as present in much lower quantities (5% vs. about 40%).
    I guess my issue with this type of thing is that they're just not selling whisky... or even cinnamon whiskey as they're label states.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whisky

    Lets be frank... they're selling Whisky/propylene glycol blend.

    There is no common understanding via historical accounts, via labeling, or via pop culture that "Whisky" contains propylene glycol. So when you sell something that is 5% by volume TAINTED with something entirely unrelated to "whisky" (as commonly understood) you should have to label it as such (just like you do at a gasoline pump when you get alcohol in your fuel) or it is a fraud.

    I don't think the government should be involved at all in HOW MUCH propylene glycol a manufacturer can add to "whisky".
    I do think the government has a role in insisting that when someone sells something as "whisky", but cut with propylene glycol, they disclose the ratio at the point of sale.




    If someone sold that $#@! to me as pure "gasoline" that would be fraud.





    The same should apply here.
    Last edited by presence; 11-01-2014 at 08:05 AM.

    'We endorse the idea of voluntarism; self-responsibility: Family, friends, and churches to solve problems, rather than saying that some monolithic government is going to make you take care of yourself and be a better person. It's a preposterous notion: It never worked, it never will. The government can't make you a better person; it can't make you follow good habits.' - Ron Paul 1988

    Awareness is the Root of Liberation Revolution is Action upon Revelation

    'Resistance and Disobedience in Economic Activity is the Most Moral Human Action Possible' - SEK3

    Flectere si nequeo superos, Acheronta movebo.

    ...the familiar ritual of institutional self-absolution...
    ...for protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment...




Similar Threads

  1. Irish Whiskey?
    By green73 in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 05-07-2014, 07:10 PM
  2. Do you like whiskey? Try this!
    By Matt Collins in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-16-2011, 08:24 PM
  3. BRILLIANT! Scotch Whiskey.....in a can!
    By amy31416 in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-19-2011, 06:52 PM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-14-2009, 08:06 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-23-2008, 09:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •