New Shocking Details in Michael Brown Investigation

[AuH20]

From hero to zero....Forensics tests nailed the bugger.

http://www.infowars.com/ferguson-civ...eralds-a-thug/

The officer, Darren Wilson, has told the authorities that during the scuffle, Mr. Brown reached for the gun. It was fired twice in the car, according to forensics tests performed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The first bullet struck Mr. Brown in the arm; the second bullet missed.

The forensics tests showed Mr. Brown’s blood on the gun, as well as on the interior door panel and on Officer Wilson’s uniform. Officer Wilson told the authorities that Mr. Brown had punched and scratched him repeatedly, leaving swelling on his face and cuts on his neck.

[Anti Federalist]

Well, that will set the cause of righting police injustices back 100 years and put everybody back into their neat little corners.

Black folks: White devil cop just gonna lie anyways.

White folks: Damn ****** thug deserved it.

FFS, why bother...

[Anti Federalist]

...

[AuH20]

Well, that will set the cause of setting police injustices back 100 years and put everybody back into their neat little corners.

Black folks: White devil cop just gonna lie anyways.

White folks: Damn ****** thug deserved it.

FFS, why bother...

I think more people should look at these things on a case by case basis. The same thing thing happened with the Utah shooting incident. I rushed to judgement thinking that the cops were bat$#@! crazy and iced the kid for no reason until the tape came out & actually cleared the police officers.

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Only thing that changed is two shots fired in the car instead of one. Everything else is the same.

[aGameOfThrones]

the aggressor hasn't changed.

[AuH20]

Only thing that changed is two shots fired in the car instead of one. Everything else is the same.

Why were shots being fired in the police vehicle? That doesn't bode well for the defense of the late Mr. Brown.

[green73]

I think more people should look at these things on a case by case basis. The same thing thing happened with the Utah shooting incident. I rushed to judgement thinking that the cops were bat$#@! crazy and iced the kid for no reason until the tape came out & actually cleared the police officers.

If anybody is a shill at this site, it's you. Seriously.

[AuH20]

If anybody is a shill at this site, it's you. Seriously.

Did you watch the tape?

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...ed-man-n215726

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Why were shots being fired in the police vehicle? That doesn't bode well for the defense of the late Mr. Brown.

It was already generally accepted that there was probably one shot in the vehicle. The forensics showed there were two. I don't see how that changes anything. I don't see how it is "shocking."

[AuH20]

It was already generally accepted that there was probably one shot in the vehicle. The forensics showed there were two. I don't see how that changes anything. I don't see how it is "shocking."

I think this info validates a struggle of some type as opposed to the one sided affair on Wilson's part that has been promoted. That's why it is so shocking since it's not customary to discharge your weapon from your vehicle if you have the upper hand. It leads one to believe that they were indeed grappling.

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

I think this info validates a struggle of some type...

There were at least three eyewitnesses who already gave an account of the struggle. Nothing new there.

as opposed to the one sided affair on Wilson's part that has been promoted. That's why it is so shocking since it's not customary to discharge your weapon from your vehicle if you have the upper hand. It leads one to believe that they were indeed grappling.

The one-sided story was already promoted by "Josie," the anonymous woman who actually got national air time telling a third hand account of what happened.

So I guess this forsenic would now be yet another contradiction of "Josie," the anonymous woman whose story was shown to be lie shortly after it came out. "Josie" said she got the story from Wilson's girlfriend. She told her story with very apparent accuracy and no hesitation.

Josie said Brown grabbed Wilson's gun and then it went off. But Josie said it only went off once, not twice. That contradicts this new evidence. And now we're supposed to believe that Brown grabbed the gun, shot himself in the arm, and then squeezed off another round before he took off.

"Josie's" radio account here. The lies continue to mount: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzBdY6WXeRE

[SeanTX]

There's still the question of whether the one deadly shot was fired as Mike Brown had his hands up trying to surrender.

There's never really been a question about a struggle in/near the police SUV -- just speculation as to how it started and what it involved (whether Wilson really slammed his door into Brown, was Brown actually going for his gun, etc).

We've seen recently on video that at least one cop has shot at someone who had his hands up in the air and posed no threat (the incident where the state trooper shot a man who reached into his vehicle for his wallet). So, the question of whether there was a street execution still remains.

[acptulsa]

Josie said Brown grabbed Wilson's gun and then it went off. But Josie said it only went off once, not twice. That contradicts this new evidence. And now we're supposed to believe that Brown grabbed the gun, shot himself in the arm, and then squeezed off another round before he took off.

Yeah, I'm trying to remember the last time I saw a holster that holds the pistol muzzle up and handle down...

[jkr]

focus and redirect to the walmart murder in beavercreek ohio

killed
for
shoppping
and holding
an
air rifle
in
an open carry state?


l00ks lyke sumone dont no da law

[squarepusher]

the officer shoots Brown at his police car, Brown runs away and the officer shoots him 40 ft away. Is that the "Finish Him" shot? Or the "I fear for my life" shot?

[phill4paul]

Seems to me that the cop still did not follow what was once called force continuum. Even after the initial shots once contact had been broken the shift to an intermediate weapon (baton, pepper spray, Taser, beanbag rounds, Mace) should have been made.
Micheal Brown was unarmed. There is no disputing this fact.

[Anti Federalist]

Seems to me that the cop still did not follow what was once called force continuum. Even after the initial shots once contact had been broken the shift to an intermediate weapon (baton, pepper spray, Taser, beanbag rounds, Mace) should have been made.
Micheal Brown was unarmed. There is no disputing this fact.

This is outmoded thinking comrade.

Brown was a hostile.

Brown was neutralized.

Officer safety was ensured.

High fives all around and RTB.

[Philhelm]

I think more people should look at these things on a case by case basis. The same thing thing happened with the Utah shooting incident. I rushed to judgement thinking that the cops were bat$#@! crazy and iced the kid for no reason until the tape came out & actually cleared the police officers.

Looking at it from a case by case basis, police shouldn't exist to begin with, at least in their current incarnation.

[limequat]

So the LEO is exonerated because Brown was already shot before he got shot again?

Seems legit.

[thoughtomator]

according to government officials briefed on the federal civil rights investigation into the matter.

let me know when a credible source arises

so far, EVERYTHING we have heard from anonymous government sources has turned out to be a total lie.

[amy31416]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Aiyana_Jones

[Brett85]

I think more people should look at these things on a case by case basis.

I think that would just be too rational. We're just supposed to always assume the cops are guilty and not even look at the facts of a case.

[TheTexan]

I think that would just be too rational. We're just supposed to always assume the cops are guilty and not even look at the facts of a case.

+rep. I get that sense as well.

It's almost like the people here only focus on the many eye-witnesses that say the cop shot him with his hands up, and completely ignores this new evidence of an additional bullet being fired in the car. They also seem to just flat-out ignore the cop's own testimony, for whatever reason.

[thoughtomator]

+rep. I get that sense as well.

It's almost like the people here only focus on the many eye-witnesses that say the cop shot him with his hands up, and completely ignores this new evidence of an additional bullets being fired in the car. They also seem to just flat-out ignore the cop's own testimony, for whatever reason.

Where's the evidence? All we have is a report from a newspaper known to lie, attributing a whole host of otherwise unsubstantiated elements to an anonymous source which is not a neutral third party.

This is like trying to sort out a court case and reporting one lawyer's telling of his client's side of the story as straight fact with no skepticism. It's something only someone who desperately wants a particular outcome (or is a complete fool) would do.

[aGameOfThrones]

THE AGGRESSOR WAS NOT THE DEAD GUY.

[Cleaner44]

From hero to zero....Forensics tests nailed the bugger.

http://www.infowars.com/ferguson-civ...eralds-a-thug/

Nothing has changed here. It was never disputed that the officer's gun was discharged in his vehicle.

The real questions are:

Why was the officer stopping Brown and his friend in the first place? We know it was not because he suspected them of any robbery or any reported crime.

Why did the officer shoot so many times at an unarmed person that was moving away from the officer?

Why did the officer shoot at an unarmed person that had his hands in the air and posed no threat to the officer?

[phill4paul]

And of course, evidence is never, ever, nuh-uh, no way, manufactured. It just doesn't happen in America. This case is not like the Trayvon Martin case wherein the state did not have a vested interest. A state's enforcer was involved. So...there is that to consider.

[ChristianAnarchist]

This is not changing much. Whatever the initial confrontation was did the officer shoot someone who was NO LONGER a threat to him?? You know perfectly well if we shot a man running away from us we would be in very hot water. Police seem to get away with this kind of action all the time just by claiming they "feared for their life". Homeowners might fear too, but it's not a defense...

[Anti Federalist]

I think that would just be too rational. We're just supposed to always assume the cops are guilty and not even look at the facts of a case.

If that was true I'd be posting stories of cops shooting in true self defense or at truly aggressive dogs.