I'm not a conspiracy theorist, just a realist. That was planned to almost perfection. Paul should have sidestepped the conspiracy question ... that was a no win question designed to make news again and again. Complete trap question.
However, it was good in this particular debate that he was largely ignored ... Plastic Man Romney and Gooliani hurt each others numbers very bad for the near term. Paul will be more prepared for the attacks the next time. In a debate format he has to get himself on one side of the fence and the others to defend the status quo. Period. Paul has to do what Harry Browne used to do in interview situations against tough guys. I think it may be still up at www.harrybrowne.org, but he used to practice these sound bites and comebacks about ever kind of situation ... libertarian Judo if you will. Harry admitted to me that "I'm really not very fast on my feet", but all that effort made him appear as though he was. Harry literally did a thousand or more interviews with his runs during 96 and 2000. I was a helper with setting some of those up, mainly on radio.
In my opinion, CNN could have given Anderson Cooper the night off and hired Jerry Springer to moderate that one. That whole thing was like a bad joke.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us