Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members
If I didn't know better, then I'd swear I was in a 1984 campaign commercial for Reagan. I know there are plenty of diehards who pine for the old days, but I would not expect this from people who are seemingly educated. I would however, expect it from politicians and others with something to gain by posting such things.
Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members
Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members
Because that makes sense. Sure, the world is the same now as it was when everywhere outside of the Americas was totally ravaged by warfare and the US had to rebuild it all. We should definitely be comparing the rate of growth in our economy today to the rate of growth in the years following World War 2. Yeah. That makes tons of sense.
Literally no one here thinks we have an optimal economic system. Everyone thinks we have too much regulation, too much taxation, and too much corporate involvement in our government. What you're saying, however, is factually untrue and utterly ridiculous. The economy is not declining. The rate of growth is declining. Those are two distinctly different things. And, depending on the timeframes you consider, the rate of growth might not even be declining. It depends which window you choose.
Concept: Synonym. Words/concepts that mean the same thing or nearly the same thing. Slowing rate = declining rate.
You, at first, talk about a single concept, then you later include other concepts. You even goes as far as saying the growth rate might not even be declining. If you want to introduce another chart or dispute the methodology of the chart I posted, then feel free to do that. Your introduction of various measures after insisting on a single one through 95% of your posts is what is ridiculous.
You can measure something at a particular point in time, measure something against a comparable object, measure something over time, etc. I posted a chart showing a slowed growth rate. That it's. Nothing more. Nothing less. The fact that the line slopes downward from left to right is declination. Yes, a slowing rate is synonymous with a declining rate. You might not like it, but your feeling does not negate it.
Again, if you want to dispute the methodology, limitations, etc, then feel free. If you accept the items composing the chart and say that it is inclining, then you might as well reserve those terms indicating feeble-mindedness for yourself.
Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members
Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members
Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members
So how much has the US economy declined in those 50 years as claimed?
Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members
Fixed that for you. And, yes, I personally know men who are counting on this hunting season to help set their families up for the coming year.
That one too. No extra charge. In spite of the fact that your 'arguments' are so utterly bankrupt that you must resort to insults on a continual basis...
Connect With Us