Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 42

Thread: Libertarian ‘Utopia’ Styled After Ayn Rand Book Spectacularly Falls Apart Almost Immediately

  1. #1

    Libertarian ‘Utopia’ Styled After Ayn Rand Book Spectacularly Falls Apart Almost Immediately

    http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/09...t-immediately/

    A community made up of American ex-pats deep in the South American hills of Chile – far away from America’s annoying taxes, healthcare mandate, and legal abortions — was supposed to be a libertarian paradise of rugged individualism. Instead it cost many of the people who bought into it almost everything, and now is buried under lawsuits — a reminder that everything that glitters is not inflation-proof, Ron Paul-backed gold.

    It seems pretty obvious that basing one’s society on a single work of (poorly written) fiction is folly, but for many adherents of Ayn Rand and her seminal book of Objectivist allegorical grandstanding, Atlas Shrugged isn’t just any book. It’s about as close to the Bible that many libertarians have — apart from the Bible, of course. It’s influenced an astounding number of conservative public figures — from Ron Paul to Rand Paul to Ronald Reagan. Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney’s Rand-loving running mate and probable 2016 presidential contender, said it was his favorite book growing up.

    ...

    For the price of $48,500 you too could own a piece of Galt’s Gulch (specifically, one-and-a-half acres of it). Amazingly, people cashed in their retirements and did just that.

    A year later and things have completely unraveled. According to one person who spent a great deal of her savings on this grand experiment, the thing was doomed from the start. Based on her description, what you are left with is the growing sense that this isn’t just a case of arrogant stupidity, this is a downright scam.

    Writing out of The Dollar Vigilante, a website devoted to the libertarian movement, the investor, Wendy McElroy, who describes herself as an individualist anarchist, documents the nightmare of Galt’s Gulch Chile:

    Many have wondered about the status of Galt’s Gulch Chile (GGC), the libertarian community that was planned and sold in lots as a liberty oasis for those who wished to live freedom before they died. My husband and I purchased an option on 1.25 acres in July 2013. Others bought 10- or 25-acre lots and some invested in the agricultural side of the venture; extremely savvy investors committed small fortunes. GGC has been an unexpectedly wild ride since then.

    After throwing in considerable money, McElroy received an email from a concerned friend, essentially calling the entire operation into question. At first McElroy dismisses the email, at the harried assurance of Ken Johnson. Later, it begins to be apparent that the concerned friend was disturbingly on the money (emphasis added).

    There will be no zoning for the 1.25-acre lots or other arrangements of less than 10 acres. GGC is an environmentally protected area and it would take the political movement of heaven and earth to allow a community based on small lots to be officially approved. I had the opportunity to ask a question of the salesman who showed my husband and me “our property.” I claimed it because I fell head over heels for the most beautiful tree I’ve ever seen. I felt an instant connection as though the two of us were old souls who had found each other. I could believe it, I could see it… waking up each morning and having coffee under that tree, telling it about my plans for the day. Months later, in a Skype conference, I asked the then-GGC-alienated salesman, “When you ‘sold’ us the property, when you printed out a photo from your phone that read ‘Wendy’s tree,’ did you know you could not legally sell us the lot you were offering?” He said, “That is correct.”

    Since writing that, the Galt’s Gulch Chile founders have been engaged in a series of increasingly dramatic legal and personal squabbles. Litigation is being thrown around, as are ad hominem attacks. Nearly all of the anger is directed at Ken Johnson. One former co-owner, Jeff Berwick, who happens to run The Dollar Vigilante website, has called Johnson a sociopath and a fraud. A Facebook community has been established calling itself “Galt’s Gulch Chile Rehab and The Exposing of Ken Johnson” to serve as a support group for other investors who felt they were ripped off.

    Meanwhile, Galt’s Gulch owes “hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars to hardware stores [and] service providers” in Chile for work done in preparation for the community. As the pyramid scheme of investors collapses, it seems likely that those workers – many of them poor laborers from small Chilean towns — will go unpaid. The workers being ripped off by the moochers? How very Randian.

    The Grim Reaper lingers nearby. By the end of August, the entire online existence of Galt’s Gulch Chile had been scrubbed from the web. Every promotional YouTube video made to entice suckers freedom-lovers has been taken down. The GGC website comes back with an error message. Ken Johnson is in the wind.

    It’s almost as if basing a community around people who hate other people and don’t want to have to pay for any services that don’t directly and concretely benefit themselves is inherently unstable. Who would have thought?



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    I read the article and I still don't quite understand what actually happened.

  4. #3
    A bunch of folks get scammed, something something, Libertarianism is thus proven a pile of bull$#@!!

    Only in the mind of the hack that wrote this article does the former prove the latter.

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by FreedomFanatic View Post
    I read the article and I still don't quite understand what actually happened.
    P.T. Barnum's law was vindicated again, and libertarians are not above suckerdom.
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    It's a balance between appeasing his supporters, appeasing the deep state and reaching his own goals.
    ~Resident Badgiraffe




  6. #5
    Geeze, what did they expect, a frickin' miracle. So AN example of Ayn's solution didn't work out as hoped, does that invalidate her problem observations and analyses?

  7. #6
    They haven't given up on socialism, fascism, dictatorships, crony-xxx-ism, yet....but libertarianism...
    "When a portion of wealth is transferred from the person who owns it—without his consent and without compensation, and whether by force or by fraud—to anyone who does not own it, then I say that property is violated; that an act of plunder is committed." - Bastiat : The Law

    "nothing evil grows in alcohol" ~ @presence

    "I mean can you imagine what it would be like if firemen acted like police officers? They would only go into a burning house only if there's a 100% chance they won't get any burns. I mean, you've got to fully protect thy self first." ~ juleswin

  8. #7
    The workers being ripped off by the moochers? How very Randian.
    huh?
    All modern revolutions have ended in a reinforcement of the power of the State.
    -Albert Camus

  9. #8
    Staff - Admin
    Houston, TX
    Bryan's Avatar


    Blog Entries
    6
    Posts
    8,672
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Quote Originally Posted by FreedomFanatic View Post
    I read the article and I still don't quite understand what actually happened.
    The author has things complete backwards. The goal to base a community away from undo government regulations failed due to government regulations. GGC was plotted out on land the local government would not allow to be developed.

    Yet the author somehow claims the whole idea is "It’s almost as if basing a community around people who hate other people and don’t want to have to pay for any services that don’t directly and concretely benefit themselves is inherently unstable." Huh?
    This site has a specific purpose defined in our Mission Statement.

    Members must read and follow our Community Guidelines.

    I strive to respond to all queries; please excuse late and out-of-sequence responses.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Gult's Gulch Chile website is actually still up and running.

    http://galtsgulchchile.com/contact-us/

    Here is a more complete story from the man who did (and, it sounds like, is determined to still do) the project, The Dollar Vigilante, Jeff Berwick:

    http://dollarvigilante.com/blog/2014...lch-chile.html

    Here is the conclusion and take-away, as of about a month ago:

    However, if GGC owns the land on which it has been selling lots (which it appears to although Ken Johnson may have recently tried to swap out the land to another company - but even if that is the case that would clearly be illegal and that transaction should be able to be nullified) and if the water rights are confirmed (one lawyer for GGC a year ago told me that the property does have sufficient water rights for the community) then it is quite possible that all the founders, investors and buyers could gain control of the enterprise and it still could be a wonderful community.

    And, in fact, almost every founder, investor and buyer is committed to doing whatever it takes to fix a ton of mismanagement mistakes (which can only be one of two things: complete incompetence or outright fraud). And the group who has founded, invested in and/or bought at GGC is one of the most amazing groups of people I've ever had the pleasure of knowing and they all want to fix this because they believe in the concept and idea and truly want to live amongst each other as neighbors.

    So, in this sense, the fight to create this community has just begun. I have told everyone involved that even though I apparently own nothing of the project I will do everything within my power to fix these problems. This has been a massive weight on my shoulders since the very beginning and not having the ability to have any sort of control of things nor even the ability to tell this story has been one of the most stressful times of my life.

    In essence, all that it would take to repair most of the problems is for Ken Johnson to allow the investors and buyers to gain access and control to their investment (as any normal business would) and allow them to restructure and professionally manage the property which they are fully willing to do. There are literally dozens of amazing, highly qualified individuals who believe in this project and want to do anything they can to make it a success. Unfortunately, whether it is due to paranoia, mental illness or trying to cover up significant fraudulent actions Johnson has shown no willingness to do so and continues to operate in complete secrecy and to treat investors and buyers as enemies.

    This will come to a resolution one way or another. This is not the last you will hear about Galt's Gulch Chile.

  12. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
    The author has things complete backwards. The goal to base a community away from undo government regulations failed due to government regulations. GGC was plotted out on land the local government would not allow to be developed.
    I heard there's a new and active volcano on the oceans floor. If it sticks it's head above water, someone run over there and stick a flag in it!

    -t

  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by tangent4ronpaul View Post
    I heard there's a new and active volcano on the oceans floor. If it sticks it's head above water, someone run over there and stick a flag in it!

    -t
    Something like that was tried. It was called Minerva. The king of Tongo came in and then took it over, as I recall. Maybe it's on the Web, I'll check.

    Update: Minerva Google link bomb-- https://www.google.com/search?q=mine...gbv=2&oq=&gs_l=
    Last edited by Ronin Truth; 09-17-2014 at 08:28 AM.

  14. #12
    "Things like that" -- island projects -- have been tried or done multiple times. Some have had a degree of success. You could read all about it in How to Start Your Own Country. A great book, by the way.

  15. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by helmuth_hubener View Post
    "Things like that" -- island projects -- have been tried or done multiple times. Some have had a degree of success. You could read all about it in How to Start Your Own Country. A great book, by the way.
    I have a copy of that book somewhere. read it long ago.
    Bummer that Loompanics went out of business

    -t

  16. #14
    Viola! and TADA!

    http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-conte...S.-Strauss.pdf

    "Seek and ye shall find, ask and it shall be given, unto thee."

  17. #15
    Very sad. Lots of discussion under Wendy's column about it here in the comments:

    http://www.thedailybell.com/editoria...s-Gulch-Chile/

    Wendy left Dollar Vigilante over it. Berwick takes responsibility here:

    http://dollarvigilante.com/blog/2014...t-30-2014.html
    Based on the idea of natural rights, government secures those rights to the individual by strictly negative intervention, making justice costless and easy of access; and beyond that it does not go. The State, on the other hand, both in its genesis and by its primary intention, is purely anti-social. It is not based on the idea of natural rights, but on the idea that the individual has no rights except those that the State may provisionally grant him. It has always made justice costly and difficult of access, and has invariably held itself above justice and common morality whenever it could advantage itself by so doing.
    --Albert J. Nock

  18. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by ClydeCoulter View Post
    They haven't given up on socialism, fascism, dictatorships, crony-xxx-ism, yet....but libertarianism...
    Socialists like to claim that capitalism doesn't work, and they point to our economic system as proof. But the truth is, actual capitalism hasn't been practiced. So it is with this situation - the claim of libertarianism, but not the practice of it.
    Diversity finds unity in the message of freedom.

    Dilige et quod vis fac. ~ Saint Augustine

    Quote Originally Posted by phill4paul View Post
    Above all I think everyone needs to understand that neither the Bundys nor Finicum were militia or had prior military training. They were, first and foremost, Ranchers who had about all the shit they could take.
    Quote Originally Posted by HOLLYWOOD View Post
    If anything, this situation has proved the government is nothing but a dictatorship backed by deadly force... no different than the dictatorships in the banana republics, just more polished and cleverly propagandized.
    "I'll believe in good cops when they start turning bad cops in."

    Quote Originally Posted by tod evans View Post
    In a free society there will be bigotry, and racism, and sexism and religious disputes and, and, and.......
    I don't want to live in a cookie cutter, federally mandated society.
    Give me messy freedom every time!



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    I'm sorry for all of the people that were taken in by this. The Atlas Society leadership folks moved to New Hampshire as part of the Free State Project. We got to see Atlas Shrugged Part 3 before anyone else, for free. We got to see Atlas Shrugged Part 2 almost before everyone else. They even held the Atlas Summit in Manchester this year, the week before PorcFest.

    For those thinking they can escape the Reach of the US government, unless it collapses or you move to Russia or China, you cannot. The US can do anything it wants to anyone in Chile.
    Lifetime member of more than 1 national gun organization and the New Hampshire Liberty Alliance. Part of Young Americans for Liberty and Campaign for Liberty. Free State Project participant and multi-year Free Talk Live AMPlifier.

  21. #18
    Careful consideration of the legal regulatory environment in which you intend to operate your venture should have been the first step before pitching the project to participants.
    Out of every one hundred men they send us, ten should not even be here. Eighty will do nothing but serve as targets for the enemy. Nine are real fighters, and we are lucky to have them, upon them depends our success in battle. But one, ah the one, he is a real warrior, and he will bring the others back from battle alive.

    Duty is the most sublime word in the English language. Do your duty in all things. You can not do more than your duty. You should never wish to do less than your duty.

  22. #19
    that show was brought to you by the Bankers. This show makes me vomit. That one dude claims to be a Libertarian?...geez......that place is Commune. No way will it ever be a Utopia......

  23. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
    The author has things complete backwards. The goal to base a community away from undo government regulations failed due to government regulations. GGC was plotted out on land the local government would not allow to be developed.
    Exactly, it should have been in Somalia.

    And to be Randian is should have been undisclosed and invite only for people who had really turned their back on the western 'system'. Not a retirement village.
    In New Zealand:
    The Coastguard is a Charity
    Air Traffic Control is a private company run on user fees
    The DMV is a private non-profit
    Rescue helicopters and ambulances are operated by charities and are plastered with corporate logos
    The agriculture industry has zero subsidies
    5% of the national vote, gets you 5 seats in Parliament
    A tax return has 4 fields
    Business licenses aren't a thing
    Prostitution is legal
    We have a constitutional right to refuse any type of medical care

  24. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by idiom View Post
    And to be Randian is should have been undisclosed and invite only for people who had really turned their back on the western 'system'. Not a retirement village.
    It's way more profitable to fleece old rich people.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Pinochet is the model
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Liberty preserving authoritarianism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Enforced internal open borders was one of the worst elements of the Constitution.

  25. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    It's way more profitable to fleece old rich people.
    Those who went Galt turned up empty handed. They burnt their enterprises to the ground and turned their back on everything they had built to sustain the leeches. This whole project was nothing of the sort.
    In New Zealand:
    The Coastguard is a Charity
    Air Traffic Control is a private company run on user fees
    The DMV is a private non-profit
    Rescue helicopters and ambulances are operated by charities and are plastered with corporate logos
    The agriculture industry has zero subsidies
    5% of the national vote, gets you 5 seats in Parliament
    A tax return has 4 fields
    Business licenses aren't a thing
    Prostitution is legal
    We have a constitutional right to refuse any type of medical care

  26. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by idiom View Post
    Those who went Galt turned up empty handed. They burnt their enterprises to the ground and turned their back on everything they had built to sustain the leeches.
    They were raptured to Randian heaven by their messiah, where they will live in objectivist utopia whilst avoiding the tribulations of the mere mortals back on Earth.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Pinochet is the model
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Liberty preserving authoritarianism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Enforced internal open borders was one of the worst elements of the Constitution.

  27. #24
    Yuk yuk yuk. Isn't The Count just so hysterical.

    Wendy McElroy: Aftermath of the GGC Firestorm
    http://www.thedailybell.com/exclusiv...GGC-Firestorm/

    Daily Bell: What have been some of the outcomes of that editorial?

    Wendy McElroy: It set off a firestorm, and I address that in another answer. One salutary outcome: The publicity seems to have cut off the funding of GGC from new buyers or investors. Four people have told me they had been on the verge of writing a check before seeing my article. They thanked me – one thanked me profusely – for hoisting a red flag. It is important to remember that the buyers are often average people who invest their life's savings in a dream of retirement. When that dream bursts, the consequences can be catastrophic. One couple has broken up and no longer speak to each other. One man now lives in his car with his partner and a young child. Saddest of all is a wonderful woman who died last week; I believe the stress of GGC hastened her demise. I should interject right now that Brad and I are fine on all fronts. But this has been a financial blow; it has been an emotional blow as well.

    The best result of the Daily Bell editorial? Until the words were spoken aloud, there could be no healing, no progress toward a solution.
    [...]
    Daily Bell: Some of the response was harsh, indeed. What about the reactions of those who seemed to take pleasure in the difficulties because it is a problem being experienced in the libertarian community? Were you surprised at the anti-libertarian backlash in the feedback and the press?

    Wendy McElroy: Yes, I was, and I should not have been. One of the indications to myself that I'd run out of perspective on GGC was that I was surprised at the viciousness of leftist posters toward me. After all, I'm a human being who has done them no harm. But I had no business being taken aback. I've dealt with gender feminists for years; they literally despise and sometimes go to great lengths to harm women who disagree with them. Heretics are hated more than infidels. In my youth, I spent quite a bit of time around Marxists whom I believe would not have hesitated to line people like me up against a wall and shoot them. And, then, there are the global warming zealots whose idea of communication is a death threat. I don't know whether defending a house-of-cards ideology turns people vicious or merely attracts the already vicious.
    [...]
    Daily Bell: Can you summarize the cites the article received away from The Daily Bell? It attracted considerable attention. Why do you think the article received such wide play?

    Wendy McElroy: The most balanced coverage to date was in the popular independent 'zine Vice, which cleaved closely to the facts without editorializing. By the way, the National Post is supposed to have a story on GGC this weekend or shortly thereafter. And the main figures in the GGC saga have been interviewed for an upcoming article in Newsweek.

    There are various reasons for the stir.

    One is because the name Galt's Gulch raises the specter of Ayn Rand whom many liberals are eager to bash. They point to GGC as a sign that her capitalist ideology is drek and her followers are fools. This is evident from the headlines used by liberal sources. For example, Salon declared, "Ayn Rand's capitalist paradise lost: The inside story of a libertarian scam." The Gawker stated, "Ayn Rand's Capitalist Paradise Is Now a Greedy Land-Grabbing $#@!storm." Addicting Info announced, "Libertarian 'Utopia' Styled After Ayn Rand Book Spectacularly Falls Apart Almost Immediately." The Daily Kos was more restrained with the headline, "Galt's Gulch Chile: The Libertarian Oasis." But the opening sentence belied the restraint, "The Real Manly Men (and even more Manly Women) of Libertarian Genius decided a couple years ago to flee the socialist Hellhole of the United States and create Galt's Gulch..." I could go on and on citing liberal coverage, especially if blogs are included.
    [...]
    Daily Bell: Why do you think there's so much anger, much of it ignorant, regarding libertarianism? The hostility was striking. Why do so many people seem to have trouble with libertarian approaches generally?

    Wendy McElroy: I believe the rise in the level of hostility is due to the increased popularity of libertarianism. We are now perceived as a real political threat. One of my favorite quotes from Mahatma Gandhi is, "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Right now libertarianism is in fighting stage, the one that comes before winning.
    Based on the idea of natural rights, government secures those rights to the individual by strictly negative intervention, making justice costless and easy of access; and beyond that it does not go. The State, on the other hand, both in its genesis and by its primary intention, is purely anti-social. It is not based on the idea of natural rights, but on the idea that the individual has no rights except those that the State may provisionally grant him. It has always made justice costly and difficult of access, and has invariably held itself above justice and common morality whenever it could advantage itself by so doing.
    --Albert J. Nock



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by idiom View Post
    Those who went Galt turned up empty handed
    Except for the big pot o' gold Ragnar Danneskjold had waiting for them all at the Gulch!
    I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States...When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank...You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal, I will rout you out!

    Andrew Jackson, 1834

  30. #26
    Trying to set up something like this in a foreign country with a foreign language and foreign laws and foreign customs makes it that much more difficult to accomplish. At least here in the States most people are relatively familiar with how things work and what sorts of laws they have to deal with.
    "Sorry, fellows, the rebellion is off. We couldn't get a rebellion permit."

  31. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin Truth View Post
    Geeze, what did they expect, a frickin' miracle. So AN example of Ayn's solution didn't work out as hoped, does that invalidate her problem observations and analyses?
    I'm not an objectivist, but I can clearly recognize that this place was nothing like Galt's Gulch. They couldn't own the property because of the presence of a tree? No, this was all scam from the moment the properties were vested. There never was an objectivist society here in the first place to even try and live or die. It was just a pyramid scheme with Objectivist language glued on to the exterior.

    Now I am not an Objectivist, but the above written events say absolutely nothing about the success or failure of a potential objectivist society, it just describes the effects of a scammer, scamming a bunch of objectivists.

  32. #28
    http://www.vice.com/read/atlas-mugged-922-v21n10

    ATLAS MUGGED: HOW A LIBERTARIAN PARADISE IN CHILE FELL APART

  33. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
    I'm not an objectivist, but I can clearly recognize that this place was nothing like Galt's Gulch.
    Yes.

    For one, the people buying in were (mostly) consumers, not producers. They were (mostly) retired, had quite a lot of money by Chilean standards, and thought they could just roll in there and build their version of America in a foreign country. Absolutely nothing in common with Galt's Gulch.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Pinochet is the model
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Liberty preserving authoritarianism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Enforced internal open borders was one of the worst elements of the Constitution.

  34. #30
    Man, this guy...

    http://wendymcelroy.com/news.php?extend.6678

    I said I would make a statement about the highly controversial Jeff Berwick video that emerged over the Labor Day weekend. (For original source on the controversy, click here: Mark Nestmann "Passport Scammer Exposed in Secret Video" on Lew Rockwell. Original video source, click here.) I was prompted to write this post by several queries from friends...and some of them from friends who have more than a passing interest in the matter. I do not have a great deal to say but, what there is, I will state simply, and take no pleasure in doing so.

    I don't know anything that is not already public about the Mexican passport business conducted by Jeff because my involvement with him was 1) as a private investor in Galt's Gulch Chile where I expected to move, and 2) a political commentator on his site the Dollar Vigilante from 2013 - 2014. I had/have no connection to his business ventures and so I had/have no inside knowledge. Sorry. I know there was legal trouble with the issuance of fraudulent passports in Paraguay which led to arrest of an agent there, who is/was said to be working for Jeff, among others. In short, the woman was arrested for running a scam. (This item provides links to the original news sources, which may require Google translate.)

    My husband and I lost a lot of money on Galt's Gulch Chile. Whether or not the dream of community can be recovered...people are still working on it (believe it or not) but Jeff isn't involved. One friend asked if I had requested a refund from Jeff. Yes, I did. No, he didn't.

    Several months ago, I asked Jeff to remove my name from the Dollar Vigilante site, except for the political commentaries I'd published there. He paid me a flat fee for them and that's a contract. Moreover, I'm not much into altering documents, sites, etc. in the quest of revisionism. My reason for backing away from TDV was not connected to passports. Jeff had publicly announced his intention to run for public office under the umbrella of the Libertarian Party of Canada and I didn't want to associate with a site that might serve as a trumpet for an aspiring politician...even if the campaign was a publicity stunt. I told Jeff as much and I might well have written for the site again once the election madness had passed.

    I understand many people have lost money on the Mexican passport packages, which sold for $25,000 each and promised to deliver a passport in record time -- a record time that could not reflect a legal process. (Here is a commentary people should read before considering the 'purchase' of a "second passport.")

    This is a sad situation, at best. I am pleased to be out of the 'drama zone' and I happily return to polishing my new book.
    Based on the idea of natural rights, government secures those rights to the individual by strictly negative intervention, making justice costless and easy of access; and beyond that it does not go. The State, on the other hand, both in its genesis and by its primary intention, is purely anti-social. It is not based on the idea of natural rights, but on the idea that the individual has no rights except those that the State may provisionally grant him. It has always made justice costly and difficult of access, and has invariably held itself above justice and common morality whenever it could advantage itself by so doing.
    --Albert J. Nock

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-13-2016, 09:03 AM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-12-2015, 07:03 PM
  3. For Libertarian Utopia, Float Away on ‘Startup’ Nation
    By jct74 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-01-2014, 10:09 PM
  4. Glenn Beck to 'build' libertarian utopia ala Galt's Gultch?
    By jllundqu in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-31-2013, 06:42 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-21-2008, 11:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •