Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 91 to 91 of 91

Thread: Darren Wilson is Stressed and in Hiding and can't leave his home

  1. #91
    Quote Originally Posted by FreedomFanatic View Post
    So, when you are absolutely certain that someone committed murder, and yet you vote to let them go free... what do you think a person who does this deserves? If you beat someone to death on camera, what do you think the appropriate punishment for that is?

    My post was more rhetorical lashing than anything as obviously nobody involved with that scenario is going to be held accountable in this life, but still...
    One abetting the mistrial of a murderer ought not be subject to any result (especially not murder by stoning... regardless of what, hypothetically, in a world of certainties, they'd deserve).

    There are many reasons for this. The most of which being you know not of the motivation of people voting that a given person is not guilty or guilty and that you are as, not being an omnipotent being as, ignorant, ill advised, biased, and short sighted as the juror who possibly wished to vote to acquit because of reason A, B, or C.

    It spits in the face of due process if upon a given verdict the jury is to fear that their result will be second guessed to the point of them being murdered (they'll vote in a manner than they otherwise would), and furthermore, in many ways, unseen but predictably realized, it would bastardize the system of 'justice' much more so than it is. It is bad enough a judge's threats are considered to be viably acted upon when directing the jury to judge the facts of the case and not the law (though they often are acted upon... and that fear, when a judge speaks or directs a juror a certain way corrupts the current system immeasurably) but to have the possibility of death for either an errant verdict or a purposely false one is a slippery slope upon which no Free Man would not even wish to crouch upon. The fear that would propagate throughout the judicial system would infest minor incidents on up to jury trials. The judge would be empowered in their direction, the jury trial becoming more of a farce than it is now.

    I understand you aren't technically advocating such a system but by God think before you post. Brandon Rob yourself of freedom referring to things in such a foolish manner, whether right or wrong. Though your previous post (the one I originally responded to) was disturbing.
    Last edited by kcchiefs6465; 08-28-2014 at 11:37 PM.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234


Similar Threads

  1. Why Darren Wilson was right ...
    By RonPaul4Prez2012 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 483
    Last Post: 08-17-2015, 09:35 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-07-2014, 12:27 AM
  3. Darren Wilson and the Protocols of Official Exoneration
    By Occam's Banana in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-26-2014, 04:09 PM
  4. Darren Wilson came from disbanded Police Dept
    By Brian4Liberty in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-24-2014, 11:30 PM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-19-2014, 10:53 AM

Select a tag for more discussion on that topic

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •