Communist agitators incite protestors in Ferguson

[Brian4Liberty]

Nothing surprising here. Outside agitation is standard procedure in so many riots and "revolutions". CNN, as an organization, has basically the same agenda with their hyped coverage.

As the outraged community in Ferguson, Missouri, continues to protest the officer-involved shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown, radical communist revolutionaries from places like Chicago and New York City are seemingly infiltrating the local demonstrations and allegedly attempting to “incite” riots.

A video uploaded on YouTube Tuesday shows Gregory Lee Johnson, a veteran member of the Revolutionary Community Party, riling up a crowd and seemingly discouraging them from listening to police’s advice to calm things down. Watch that video here:
...
St. Louis Alderman Antonio French also took notice of Johnson’s presence at demonstrations in Ferguson on Tuesday. He included a photo of Johnson among a group of men apparently trying to light Molotov cocktails:
...
Also spotted in Ferguson was Revolutionary Community Party operative Travis Morales.
...
Morales was later reportedly among four men from Brooklyn to be arrested in Ferguson:
...
Obviously, it is highly unlikely that Johnson and Morales traveled to Ferguson alone — though it’s unclear how many of their colleagues are currently in the area.

The presence of communist revolutionaries at the demonstrations is not unusual, however. Revolutionaries like Johnson and Morales seek to use chaos and unrest to further their radical agenda to transform America away from its capitalist system.

It was reported that 25 percent of protesters arrested on Monday night were not from Ferguson. These are some the people people CNN has described as “agitators.”
...
More:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...s-in-ferguson/

[CPUd]

This dude is probably playing both sides:

[Brian4Liberty]

This dude is probably playing both sides:

He talks a good game. Seemed like he was inferring that there were government agent provocateurs (maybe it's just the wording), but he didn't identify anyone in particular. The communist infiltrators are on camera and identified, so there's no doubt about them.

[CPUd]

He talks a good game. Seemed like he was inferring that there were government agent provocateurs (maybe it's just the wording), but he didn't identify anyone in particular. The communist infiltrators are on camera and identified, so there's no doubt about them.

He used to run the NBPP, and the infiltrators are probably his own people.

[thoughtomator]

few nights ago I definitely saw "black bloc" types in the melee stirring up $#@!... one of them let loose a molotov on camera

[JK/SEA]

yes, yes....appearences do indeed matter...

[phill4paul]

Nothing good happens in a vacuum. Some militias should have been there. I know that it might have been contentious but, perhaps, it might have created something bigger. Better.

[56ktarget]

Paulites thinking:

Communist/socialist speaks to a crowd= Communist "agitation", inciting riots and "revolution"
Libertarian/Paulites speaks to a crowd= Spreading peace and "liberty"

Lol, cognitive dissonance at its finest. Especially considering their slogan is "rLOVEution", lol.

[DFF]

I've never liked the term "Paulite."

It's a derisive term, akin to "gold bug."

More negative rep coming...which I'm sure you will enjoy.

[Lord Xar]

Paulites thinking:

Communist/socialist speaks to a crowd= Communist "agitation", inciting riots and "revolution"
Libertarian/Paulites speaks to a crowd= Spreading peace and "liberty"

Lol, cognitive dissonance at its finest. Especially considering their slogan is "rLOVEution", lol.

Actually, you sound like a tool. First off, libertarians/Paulites - to the best of my knowledge, aren't traveling to known powder key environments trying to incite violence based on a false premise.

When "one" has to resort to manipulation & skullduggery to incite "revolution", it is pretty clear that the ideology can't stand on it's own. That is communism/socialism.

There is a CLEAR difference in your example, how you can't see it -- well, perhaps THAT is the cognitive dissonance.

See, these directionless "riots" are not real spearpoints for a revolution... that is why the agitators are there. They are trying to corral their useful idiots into THEIR agenda. What is funny, is that the very nature of the problem stems from the very same policies that these "agitators" want more of... they just want more. Policies of dependence, collectivism etc...

See, the spearpoint of discontent can be pointed into the heart of the state - which the commies do NOT want.

[56ktarget]

Actually, you sound like a tool. First off, libertarians/Paulites - to the best of my knowledge, aren't traveling to known powder key environments trying to incite violence based on a false premise.

When "one" has to resort to manipulation & skullduggery to incite "revolution", it is pretty clear that the ideology can't stand on it's own. That is communism/socialism.

There is a CLEAR difference in your example, how you can't see it -- well, perhaps THAT is the cognitive dissonance.

See, these directionless "riots" are not real spearpoints for a revolution... that is why the agitators are there. They are trying to corral their useful idiots into THEIR agenda. What is funny, is that the very nature of the problem stems from the very same policies that these "agitators" want more of... they just want more. Policies of dependence, collectivism etc...

See, the spearpoint of discontent can be pointed into the heart of the state - which the commies do NOT want.

I must have missed the part where communists were creating riots. Try again.

[hotdude]

DHS Is Employing Agent Provocateurs and Are Behind the Events In Ferguson: http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/20...s-in-ferguson/

[acptulsa]

Paulites thinking:

Communist/socialist speaks to a crowd= Communist "agitation", inciting riots and "revolution"
Libertarian/Paulites speaks to a crowd= Spreading peace and "liberty"

Lol, cognitive dissonance at its finest. Especially considering their slogan is "rLOVEution", lol.

It isn't cognitive dissonance until you post vid of a libertarian inciting a riot, anywhere, at any time, ever. Or, at least, it isn't our cognitive dissonance, it's yours.

And remember: No one incited a riot on Bundy's ranch. Indeed, libertarians prevented the federal officials from rioting.

I must have missed the part where communists were creating riots. Try again.

You didn't know the DHS is communist? Obviously, your education concerning Uncle Joe Stalin is sadly lacking.

The good news is you're not guilty of slander. Just libel, that's all.

[Natural Citizen]

I was wondering when Beck's outfit would chime in with their brand of spin.

I hadn't heard of this so will have to do some information searching. While it is certainly possible, we'd do well to remember the mindset or, more specifically, frame pattern that we're dealing with from Beck and his demograph with regard to similar events.

[Brian4Liberty]

Paulites thinking:

Communist/socialist speaks to a crowd= Communist "agitation", inciting riots and "revolution"
Libertarian/Paulites speaks to a crowd= Spreading peace and "liberty"

Lol, cognitive dissonance at its finest. Especially considering their slogan is "rLOVEution", lol.

Where is your video of a "Paulite" inciting riots?

And no where did anyone say that a communist simply talking to people is inciting a riot. But these specific Marxists were doing it.

Using your logic, someone could see a communist kick a dog, and then ask "why do commies kick dogs"?

[Brian4Liberty]

Paulites thinking:

So you must be a "Paulite" by virtue of you posting here...

[acptulsa]

Where is your video of a "Paulite" inciting riots?

And no where did anyone say that a communist simply talking to people is inciting a riot. But these specific Marxists were doing it.

Using your logic, someone could see a communist kick a dog, and then ask "why do commies kick dogs"?

Actually, that brand of alleged logic he she or it was using was more along the lines of seeing a communist kick a dog and asking, 'Why do libertarians kick dogs?' But, you know, if down wasn't up in a progressive's world how could they possibly say Obamacare isn't making the rich richer and the poor poorer?

[56ktarget]

Lol y'all must have missed the Bundy incident. Imagine if communists had prevented federal officials from doing their jobs, y'all would be up in arms in a heartbeat.

[acptulsa]

Lol y'all must have missed the Bundy incident. Imagine if communists had prevented federal officials from doing their jobs, y'all would be up in arms in a heartbeat.

I mentioned the Bundy incident. Hard to mention something one has missed. Libertarians prevented communists from having a riot. I'm sorry you're so butthurt about us believers in liberty deciding those commies with the BLM had no right to riot, but there it is. Non-Aggression and all that.

And, yes, when the commies prevent the other commies from doing their job, it is upsetting. Like when these bureaucrats that you insist are competent and love us and want us to be happy were too busy having an interservice rivalry to put a stop to 9/11/01. Kind of blows any rational person's faith in the whole communist manifesto, know what I mean?

Damn! What happened to those good old days five and six years ago when we got a competent class of troll around here? Things were so much more challenging then.

[Brian4Liberty]

Lol y'all must have missed the Bundy incident. Imagine if communists had prevented federal officials from doing their jobs, y'all would be up in arms in a heartbeat.

Yeah, we missed the part where private businesses were being looted and burned, and where people were throwing Molotov cocktails.

[Natural Citizen]

Where is your video of a "Paulite" inciting riots?

Heh. Lookit what I found...

[56ktarget]

Yeah, we missed the part where private businesses were being looted and burned, and where people were throwing Molotov cocktails.

You must have also missed the part where out of control militia members stopped innocent passerbys on the roads, demanding proof they were legal citizens.

And it isn't a surprise there was no rioting, considering no one got shot unlike in Ferguson.

[acptulsa]

You must have also missed the part where out of control militia members stopped innocent passerbys on the roads, demanding proof they were legal citizens.

Ah, yes. The part where these out of control people confronted passersby, explained to them what was going on, failed to rob them, failed to shoot them, and failed to recruit them to commit violence against anyone else.

And it isn't a surprise there was no rioting, considering no one got shot unlike in Ferguson.

There you go. Commies vs. commies in Ferguson, and people get shot. Commies vs. libertarians in Nevada, and no one gets shot. Absolutely. Wonderful to be able to agree wholeheartedly with you.

Wait a minute. Whose side are you on again? Why are you making this so easy for me?

[Brian4Liberty]

Heh. Lookit what I found...

Nice! Especially since I took the photo (yellow shirt) at the beginning of the video!

[Natural Citizen]

Nice! Especially since I took the photo (yellow shirt) at the beginning of the video!

Huh! No $#@!. I gave you a rep point. This is my favorite video. There is an extended one but I didn't see it.

[56ktarget]

Ah, yes. The part where these out of control people confronted passersby, explained to them what was going on, failed to rob them, failed to shoot them, and failed to recruit them to commit violence against anyone else.



There you go. Commies vs. commies in Ferguson, and people get shot. Commies vs. libertarians in Nevada, and no one gets shot. Absolutely. Wonderful to be able to agree wholeheartedly with you.

Wait a minute. Whose side are you on again? Why are you making this so easy for me?

Lol at the generalization of an entire city as communists. Lol, are you Mccarthy's son or something?

[acptulsa]

Lol at the generalization of an entire city as communists. Lol, are you Mccarthy's son or something?

I didn't say the entire city is a bunch of communists, friend. You're lying, misrepresenting, putting words in my mouth I didn't say, and libeling me again. In other words, you're using the Prog Toolbox.

I classified the communist agitators as communists. And I classified federal employees as communists, because if communism is something other than federal micromismanagement of as much as possible, then I'm going to need six or seven unimpeachable sources to convince me of it. That's what Uncle Joe Stalin called communism, that's what My Man Mao called it, that's what the murderous CheGue called it, and that's what I call it.

Now, link to where I said the whole city was inciting riots, or the whole city was imported from some beatnik pinko hole in Brooklyn, or the whole city is employed by the federal government, or apologize for lying, or just shut up and quit before you get any farther behind.

Those would be my best suggestions. But if you don't want to save face, and prefer for people to think you a fool, that's fine too.

[56ktarget]

There you go. Commies vs. commies in Ferguson, and people get shot.

Fail.

[DevilsAdvocate]

Are these communists able to be appealed to with any sort of logic or reason? Or are they just too far gone, foaming-at-the-mouth crazies who are impossible to reach? It's hard to believe that anybody can cling to such a failed ideology in this modern day and age, and if anybody has the ability to totally crush their point of view it's us libertarian minded folks. What do you think, can we reach these people?

Maybe we can even reach the troll in our midst?

[56ktarget]

Such irony...