Who in California dares elect such moronic fools into its public offices? Why, why, oh why!On a three-day trade mission to Mexico, California governor Jerry Brown talked… “We can see how some are fearful of children walking across the border,” Brown said at the signing of a voluntary climate-change agreement with Mexico’s Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, according to the Journal. “What will they think when millions of people are driven north from the parched landscapes of a world degraded by intensifying climate change?”
Brown reportedly spoke of California’s relationship with Mexico as older than the one his state has with the “government in Washington.” Brown pledged to do whatever he could do to aid the Central American unaccompanied alien children arriving in his state and proclaimed his support for additional shelters for the illegal-immigrant children in California.
Actually, California was ruled by Mexico only from 1821 until 1846, when Mexico won its independence from Spain in 1821, before that it had remained largely under Spanish rule (i.e., Conquistadors and Jesuits), until when in 1848 Mexico signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, turning California (including portions soon to either become or expand the borders of Texas—1845, Nevada—1864, Colorado—1876, Wyoming—1890, Utah—1896, Arizona—1912, and New Mexico—1912) into a United States territory until it received sovereign statehood in 1850 as America’s 31st state.
The illegals that are now poring into the states by the thousands—through no less than the willfully negligent and intended failure of the Executive—are being transported inside the borders of the United States not from Mexico, but through Mexico from Guatemala—which is its own independent nation. So Governor Brown needs to first get his facts straightened out prior to chomping down on his own stupidity while in public.
Finally, so far as the matter of “climate change” is concerned, with exception to commenting that the climate changes four times a year, with respect to the exacting rotational axis of earth throughout each year or arguing over smog pollution and air quality, the debate on arguing over anthropological global warming, the greenhouse effect, the so-called “climate change” debate has been utterly destroyed and exposed for the “Blood and Gore” fraud that it aptly is. One only makes themselves out to be a scaremongering simpleton otherwise (As if the people of a tropical climate are at all concerned over the occasional abnormally hot year here and there.)
Certainly, why must our politicians base support in argument for their kind of sought after tyranny on fictional movies such as “The Day After Tomorrow”? Would such be just, that such a fool might be recalled?
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us