Why are they bad?
Reply With Quote
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Why are they bad?
I don't know, V. Opinions vary, I suppose. Let's wait for a few. Whataya say?
This oughtta be a hoot.
Here's a good start...
Koch ally to introduce Monsanto-backed bill to bar state GMO labeling laws
Last edited by Natural Citizen; 04-21-2014 at 07:51 PM.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_brothers
Lefties don't like them because they help conservative orgs/PACS compete against the unions and their funneling of money to democrats.
Last edited by FSP-Rebel; 04-21-2014 at 08:37 PM.
Deflection... taking the focus off of the USUAL SUSPECTS; Banks, the FED, Military Industrial Complex, and Government Whores.
Nothing is done in this nation without the authorization or force of the US Government.
The American Dream, Wake Up People, This is our country! <===click
"All eyes are opened, or opening to the rights of man, let the annual return of this day(July 4th), forever refresh our recollections of these rights, and an undiminished devotion to them."
Thomas Jefferson June 1826
Rock The World!
USAF Veteran
Q. Who are the Koch brothers?
A. They are by far the largest backs of libertarian and liberty Republican causes in the world.
Q. Why are the Koch brothers so bad?
A. Because they not only like liberty, they have donated 100s of millions of dollars to help stop statism/bring about liberty.
Lifetime member of more than 1 national gun organization and the New Hampshire Liberty Alliance. Part of Young Americans for Liberty and Campaign for Liberty. Free State Project participant and multi-year Free Talk Live AMPlifier.
Maybe a lot of it is that some groups foster a lot of hate that gets picked up by people wanting to fit into the pack. The same sort of thing catches a lot of people up and going against the John Burch Society. Read a little up on the brothers yourself. I think I'm more with them than against. Even when I'm against them I think I still respect them.Originally Posted by Vanguard101
The thing is I'm thinking there are more than just the one pack. In fact perhaps you don't need to be part of one and find yourself a lone wolf.
A lot of us did just that in the sixties only to find ourselves amongst a whole giant world of people that thought just like us. The times are prime now for another awakening.
http://photos.imageevent.com/stokeyb...singleTiny.jpgClick to embiggenhttp://photos.imageevent.com/stokeyb...yvaluetiny.jpgClick to embiggenhttp://photos.imageevent.com/stokeyb...strialtiny.jpgClick to embiggen
Ok I coulda sworn I read somewhere that libertarians hated them LOL.
Why doesn't Rand use them as a big donor?
BS.
I just showed you (merely 1) instance in which they have merged with industry and some politicians on their payrole to manipulate our political process of representation in a manner that disfranchises both the people as well as states rights.
Liberty my ass. Liberty for whom? Certainly not the people.
I've said many times that libertariansim serves as the stalking horse for fascism itself, and it does, and here you've reminded me of the phenomenon first hand.
Last edited by Natural Citizen; 04-21-2014 at 11:20 PM.
Mandatory GMO labeling laws aren't exactly pro-liberty, but that issued has been covered before.
The Koch brothers are okay ideologically. They certainly aren't featherweights when it comes to libertarian radicalism and I don't doubt that they sincerely believe in the message.
Some libertarians dislike them though because they have a different vision on how the liberty movement should promote itself. I myself have some disagreements on how they conduct themselves and certainly don't like how they support the Republicans. I wouldn't say they aren't libertarian though. They are, they simply have different views on how to promote it and that is okay.
Progressives hate them, although much of the hate is unwarranted. I'll grant progressives that the Koch's industries do sketchy things at times and we shouldn't whitewash these deeds. At the same time the Kochs must be properly noted for their favorable views on personal liberty issues such as same-sex marriage.
P.S. There is also a subset of libertarians who dislike the Kochs because they tried to take over the Cato Institute a while back.
P.P.S. And of course there are libertarians who dislike the Kochs for ever funding the Cato Institute. And so forth and so forth.
But we're not done covering it. The Koch network just partnered with Monsanto and Congressman Mike Pompeo to introduce industry backed legislation that dictates that human beings don't have the right to ever know or ask what they consume into their bodies and that states have no say so in it either. This is treason on behalf of Pompeo and corruption of our political processes for representation in the highest regard. And, I'd add, a violation of basic human rights. There cannot be liberty without choice. Ever. This is anti-liberty for the people. The only liberty that I, for one, can gather from this skullduggery is for a few elites to freely disfranchise the citizens for whom these reprentatives or sellouts, to be clear, were elected to represent as well as states rights. This is corporate repatriation of the sovereignty of entire nations in it's earliest stages where the U.S. is the only place in which they can grasp a foothold for these industries prior to expanding abroad via the TPP. And, as we see, they'll certainly show no regard for the rights of the people during the process. They'll disfranchise the right of the people in a country minute, as this industry sponsored legislation demonstrates, and not lose a seconds sleep over it.
How is this liberty in any way for the people who seek a means to actually choose what they eat? It's not. And all it really does is protect the industry from the free market. This is mercantilism. And during a time when the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement is hardly whispered in the so called libertarian community. It's political malfeasance.
Heck, we've only begun. The issue is hardly covered at all. It seems to me that many in the so called libertarian community either turn a blind eye to disfranchisement, corruption and treason as long as their favorite politicians get paid along the way or simply aren't competent to know what the issue truly entails in scope. This idea that the issue has been covered and that no more questions should be asked is disingenuous at the very least.
Last edited by Natural Citizen; 04-21-2014 at 10:30 PM.
I guess some people don't like Young Americans for Liberty, Students for Liberty, Americans for Prosperity, ALEC, Drug Policy Alliance or whatever it is, Reason, the Libertarian Party, CATO and the ACLU. If you want all of the groups to go away, hate the Koch brothers. If you care anything about liberty in the US, love the Koch brothers. The choice is yours. I certainly won't try to force your hand.
Last edited by Keith and stuff; 04-21-2014 at 11:15 PM.
Lifetime member of more than 1 national gun organization and the New Hampshire Liberty Alliance. Part of Young Americans for Liberty and Campaign for Liberty. Free State Project participant and multi-year Free Talk Live AMPlifier.
Media created boogeymen for the left. The right, of course, has George Soros for their 2 minute hate.
I don't hate them or love them either.
Mapping the Influence of Koch Cash
2010 cycle...
The Koch brothers’ congressional empire...
House
Adams, Sandy (R-FL) $5,000 Republican Florida
Barletta, Louis J. (R-PA) $5,000 Republican Pennsylvania
Benishek, Daniel J. (R-MI) $5,000 Republican Michigan
Berg, Rick (R-ND) $5,000 Republican North Dakota
Black, Diane Lynn (R-TN) $2,500 Republican Tennessee
Canseco, Francisco (R-TX) $2,500 Republican Texas
Chabot, Steve (R-OH) $10,000 Republican Ohio
Denham, Jeff (R-CA) $5,000 Republican California
Dold, Robert (R-IL) $5,000 Republican Illinois
Duffy, Sean P. (R-WI) $10,000 Republican Wisconsin
Duncan, Jeff (R-SC) $2,500 Republican South Carolina
Farenthold, Blake (R-TX) $5,000 Republican Texas
Fincher, Steve (R-TN) $10,000 Republican Tennessee
Flores, William (R-TX) $2,500 Republican Texas
Gardner, Cory (R-CO) $10,000 Republican Texas
Gibbs, Bob (R-OH) $5,000 Republican Ohio
Gowdy, Trey (R-SC) $5,000 Republican South Carolina
Griffin, Tim (R-AR) $7,500 Republican Arkansas
Griffith, Morgan (R-VA) $5,000 Republican Virginia
Guinta, Frank (R-NH) $5,000 Republican New Hampshire
Hanna, Richard L. (R-NY) $5,000 Republican New York
Harris, Andy (R-MD) $10,000 Republican Maryland
Hartzler, Vicky (R-MO) $5,000 Republican Missouri
Hayworth, Nan (R-NY) $5,000 Republican New York
Heck, Joe (R-NV) $10,000 Republican Nevada
Herrera, Jaime (R-WA) $5,000 Republican Washington
Huelskamp, Tim (R-KS) $7,500 Republican Kansas
Huizenga, Bill (R-MI) $2,500 Republican Michigan
Hultgren, Randy (R-IL) $5,000 Republican Illinois
Hurt, Robert (R-VA) $5,000 Republican Virginia
Kelly, Mike (R-PA) $5,000 Republican Pennsylvania
Kinzinger, Adam (R-IL) $5,000 Republican Illinois
Lankford, James (R-OK) $5,000 Republican Oklahoma
Long, Billy (R-MO) $1,000 Republican Missouri
Meehan, Patrick L. (R-PA) $7,500 Republican Pennsylvania
Mulvaney, John Michael “Mick’’ (R-SC) $5,000 Republican South Carolina
Noem, Kristi Lynn (R-SD) $5,000 Republican South Dakota
Nugent, Richard B. (R-FL) $2,500 Republican Florida
Palazzo, Steven (R-MS) $5,000 Republican Mississippi
Pearce, Steve (R-NM) $10,000 Republican New Mexico
Pompeo, Mike (R-KS) $10,000 Republican Kansas
Quayle, Ben (R-AZ) $5,000 Republican Arizona
Renacci, James B. (R-OH) $5,000 Republican Ohio
Ribble, Reid (R-WI) $5,000 Republican Wisconsin
Rigell, Scott (R-VA) $5,000 Republican Virginia
Rivera, David (R-FL) $10,000 Republican Florida
Roby, Martha (R-AL) $5,000 Republican Alabama
Ross, Dennis (R-FL) $10,000 Republican Florida
Runyan, Jon (R-NJ) $5,000 Republican New Jersey
Schilling, Bobby (R-IL) $5,000 Republican Illinois
Schweikert, David (R-AZ) $5,000 Republican Arizona
Scott, Austin (R-GA) $5,000 Republican Georgia
Scott, Tim (R-SC) $2,500 Republican South Carolina
Southerland, Steve (R-FL) $5,000 Republican Florida
Stivers, Steve (R-OH) $10,000 Republican Ohio
Tipton, Scott (R-CO) $2,500 Republican Colorado
Walberg, Tim (R-MI) $10,000 Republican Michigan
Webster, Daniel (R-FL) $5,000 Republican Florida
Womack, Steve (R-AR) $2,500 Republican Arkansas
Woodall, Rob (R-GA) $2,500 Republican Georgia
Yoder, Kevin W. (R-KS) $10,000 Republican Kansas
Young, Todd (R-IN) $5,000 Republican Indiana
Senate
Ayotte, Kelly A. (R-NH) $10,000 Republican New Hampshire
Blunt, Roy (R-MO) $10,000 Republican Missouri
Brown, Scott P. (R-MA) $5,000 Republican Massachusetts
Coats, Daniel R. (R-IN) $10,000 Republican Indiana
Hoeven, John (R-ND) $10,000 Republican North Dakota
Johnson, Ron (R-WI) $10,000 Republican Wisconsin
Kirk, Mark (R-IL) $15,000 Republican Illinois
Moran, Jerry (R-KS) $10,000 Republican Kansas
Paul, Rand (R-KY) $5,000 Republican Kentucky
Portman, Rob (R-OH) $10,000 Republican Ohio
Rubio, Marco (R-FL) $10,000 Republican Florida
Toomey, Pat (R-PA) $10,000 Republican Pennsylvania
Source: Center for Responsive Politics.
Bankrolling state politicians
Alabama $43,500
Alaska $38,613
Arizona $5,000
Arkansas $60,500
California $1,149,500
Delaware $1,800
Florida $249,195
Georgia $500,355
Idaho $500
Illinois $11,000
Indiana $2,500
Iowa $131,150
Kansas $478,270
Kentucky $3,500
Louisiana $218,291
Maine $11,100
Michigan $1,500
Minnesota $98,160
Mississippi $163,600
Missouri $2,375
Nebraska $5,000
Nevada $6,000
New Mexico $26,500
New York $274,700
North Carolina $19,000
Ohio $56,050
Oklahoma $197,375
Oregon $141,863
Pennsylvania $39,000
South Carolina $20,700
Texas $740,570
Virginia $273,402
Washington $94,050
Wisconsin $160,185
Total $5,224,803
Source: “KOCH INDUSTRIES Overview Map,” available at http://www.followthe-
money.org/database/natnoteview.phtml?u=1457&y=0&ince=1&incs=1.
Gubernatorial Elections
Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) received $76,000 from the Koch network
Gov. Mary Fallin (R-OK) received $5,000 from the Koch network
Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) received $87,000 from the Koch network
Gov. Terry Branstad (R-IA) received $5,000 from the Koch network
Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) received $43,000 from the Koch network
Gov. Tom Corbett (R-PA) received $5,000 from the Koch network
Gov. John Kasich (R-OH) received $22,000 from the Koch network
Gov. Mike Beebe (D-AR) received $4,000 from the Koch network
Gov. Sam Brownback (R-KS) received $20,000 from the Koch network
Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter (R-ID) received $500 from the Koch network
Gov. Nathan Deal (R-GA) received $15,600 from the Koch network
Gov. Mark Dayton (D-MN) received $250 from the Koch network
Gov. Susana Martinez (R-NM) received $10,000 from the Koch network
Source: National Institute for Money in State Politics
Bankrolling and influencing the U.S. Congress...
House Energy and Commerce Committee - single-largest oil-and-gas donor to members of the committee, giving $279,500 to 22 Republicans on the committee and $32,000 to five of its Democrats.
2010 Midterm Elections - Koch network spent $2.1 million last cycle...almost $2 million of which went to Republicans.
Since 1990 - Koch network has donated $11 million to federal candidates. $9.8 million of which went to Republicans.
Voter-organizing arm of the Koch empire - Americans for Prosperity, The Americans for Prosperity Foundation, FreedomWorks,
Action Groups and Think Tanks - Koch nonprofit organizations records show they have given at least $85.9 million to the following over the last decade...
Cato Institute, Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research, Citizens for a Sound Economy 2, Environmental Literacy Council, George Mason’s Mercatus Center, Property and Environment Research Center, Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Center for Equal Opportunity,
Heritage Foundation, Institute for Energy Research, Institute for Humane Studies, Atlas Economic Research Foundation, Bill of Rights Institute, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Youth Entrepreneurs of Kansas, Citizens for Congressional Reform Foundation, Institute for Justice, Frontiers of Freedom Institute, Reason Foundation,Texas Public Policy Foundation, National Foundation for Teaching Entrepreneurship,The Phillips Foundation, Federalist Society,John Locke Foundation, Institute for the Study of Human Origins,Fund for American Studies, American Enterprise Institute & Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, James Madison Institute, Manhattan Institute, John W. Pope Center for Higher Education Policy, Washington Legal Foundation, Young America’s Foundation, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, Leadership Institute, Foundation for Research on Economics & the Environment, American Council on Science & Health, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Laffer Center for Global Economic Growth, National Center for Policy Analysis, Association of Private Enterprise Education, American Legislative Exchange Council, Commonwealth Foundation for Public Policy Alternatives, Capital Research Center, Center for Independent Thought, Tax Foundation,National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) Legal Foundation, Independent Women’s Forum, Carbon Dioxide & Global Change Center, International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics,Mackinac Center for Public Policy, Acton Institute, Market Based Management Institute, Fraser Institute, Media Institute, Pacific Research Institute, Heartland Institute, American Council for Capital Formation, Goldwater Institute, George C. Marshall Institute, Institute for Research on the Economics of Taxation, Libertarian Review Foundation, Americans for Tax Reform, Students in Free Enterprise, Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions, Center for Excellence in Education, Center for Freedom & Prosperity Foundation,Ayn Rand Institute, National Tax Limitation Foundation,International Policy Network, North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Free Enterprise Education Institute, Atlantic Legal Foundation, South Carolina Policy Council for Political Economy, Center for Individual Rights, Media Research Center, Texas Justice Foundation, Future of Freedom Foundation, Foundation for Economic Education, Pacific Legal Foundation, National Taxpayers Union Foundation, Foundation for Human Development, Institute for Policy Innovation, American Spectator, Critical Review Foundation, Galen Institute, Hudson Institute
Source: Tax records for the Claude R. Lambe Charitable Foundation, David H. Koch Charitable Foundation, and the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation, available at guidestar.org for 2009 and compiled on Media Matters Action Network website for prior years.
Koch Industries:
Flint Hills Resources, LP - markets petroleum products, including asphalt, base oils, gasoline, jet fuel, diesel, and heating oils.
The Koch unit operates refining complexes in Alaska (North Pole), Minnesota(Pine Bend Refinery in Rosemount), and Texas (Corpus Christi). In addition,Flint Hills Resources also operates the Wisconsin pipeline, which carries products from the company’s Twin Cities-area refinery to terminals in Junction City, Waupu, Madison, and Milwaukee, and operates the MSP Airport line that delivers jet fuel to the Minneapolis/St. Paul airport. In Texas, the unit operates the Texas Pipeline system, which runs from Corpus Christi to the San Antonio, Austin, Bastrop, Waco, and Dallas/Fort Worth markets, and the DFW Airport line that delivers jet fuel from the Fort Worth-area terminal to the Dallas/Fort Worth airport. Flint Hills also operates ethanol plants in Menlo and Shell Rock, Iowa, that pro-duce 220 million gallons of ethanol annually. It is a leading producer of chemicals and related products with manufacturing facilities in Illinois, Michigan, and Texas.
It has an interest in a base lube oil facility in Louisiana as well as interests in a biodiesel feedstock development company in California. According to its website, Flint Hills produces fuels that power most of Texas, the Midwest, and the Alaska interior. The asphalt it produces is used across the Midwest and Alaska.
Koch Supply & Trading, LP - Koch Supply & Trading provides risk management in crude oil, refined petroleum products, natural gas, and other commodities. The company is an indirect subsidiary of Koch Industries. Koch Supply & Trading has locations in Houston, New York City, and Wichita as well as London, Geneva, Singapore, India, and the Netherlands.
According to its website, products traded by Koch Supply & Trading include: crude oil; refined products and derivatives; natural gas liquids; natural gas, power, and emissions; metals; financials including foreign currency, interest rates, and exchange-traded commodities; and freight.
Koch Pipeline Company - Koch Pipeline Company is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Koch Industries. Many of the pipelines and terminal facilities it operates are owned by Flint Hills Resources. Koch Pipeline owns or operates 4,000 miles of pipeline to 5 Center for American Progress Action Fund | the Koch Brothers transport crude oil, refined petroleum, natural gas liquids, and other chemicals. It
operates proprietary and common carrier crude oil pipelines that deliver to refining centers in the Midwest and Texas.
Koch Pipeline operates the 540-mile South Texas system, which moves domestic crude oil to Corpus Christi. And units of the Koch subsidiary own pieces of other pipelines. For instance, the Koch Alaska Pipeline owns 3 percent of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, and another Koch company owns 28 percent of the Colonial Pipeline Company.
Georgia-Pacific - Georgia-Pacific became a wholly owned subsidiary of Koch Industries in 2005 after the two brothers paid $21 billion to take over the company and take it private. Georgia-Pacific is a manufacturer and marketer of “tissue, packaging, paper, pulp, and building products and related chemicals.”
Georgia-Pacific’s North American brands include: Quilted Northern (toilet paper), Angel Soft (toiletpaper), Brawny (paper towels), Sparkle (paper towels), Soft ‘n Gentle (toiletpaper), Mardi Gras (paper towels), Vanity Fair (paper napkins), and the Dixie
brand of tabletop products.
Georgia-Pacific has facilities in 27 states, including 25 in Georgia; 18 in Florida; 14 in Mississippi; 13 in California and Oregon; 10 in Arkansas and North Carolina; nine in Texas; eight in Alabama, South Carolina, and Wisconsin; seven in Virginia; five in Michigan and Tennessee; four in Ohio; three in Iowa, Pennsylvania, and Washington; two in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, New
Jersey, and New York; and one in Massachusetts, Oklahoma, and West Virginia.
INVISTA B.V. - INVISTA, formerly DuPont Textiles and Interiors, is an independently managed but wholly owned subsidiary of Koch Industries. Koch subsidiaries acquired INVISTA from E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company in 2004 and it was combined with Koch affiliate KoSa. INVISTA is a producer of nylon, span- dex, and polyester polymers and fibers. The materials go into clothing, carpets,
luggage, plastic bottles, and car interiors. Its products include LYCRA fiber, STAINMASTER carpet, ANTRON carpet fiber, and COOLMAX fabric.
Koch Chemical Technology Group, LLC - Koch Chemical Technology Group and its affiliates manufacture and sell pollution-control equipment. Affiliates include: Koch-Glitsch, LP; Koch Membrane Systems, Inc.; Koch Heat Transfer Company, LP; John Zink Company, LLC; Optimized Process Designs, Inc.; and Koch Knight LLC.
Koch Mineral Services, LLC - Koch Minerals and its affiliates are among the largest dry-bulk commodity handlers. It markets or trades 40 million tons of product per year. Koch Minerals also has direct or indirect subsidiaries that collectively are one of the world’s largest
producers and marketers of nitrogen fertilizers.
Those companies include: Koch Nitrogen Company (Koch Fertilizer), LLC; Koch Nitrogen International, Sárl and Koch Fertilizer Canada.
Koch Nitrogen and its affiliates have personnel in Wichita; Brandon, Manitoba; Geneva; London; Cayman Islands; Paris; and Beijing.
They also have international operations and interests in Venezuela, Manitoba, and Trinidad and Tobago.
Matador Cattle Company - Matador Cattle Company is a key division of Koch Agriculture Company and an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Koch Industries.
The company operates ranches that together comprise 425,000 managed acres, of which 240,000 are deeded acres, and support 15,000 cattle in production herds.
It operates three ranches: Beaverhead in Montana, Matador in Texas, and Spring Creek in Kansas.
Given the array of industries in which Koch Industries is involved, from energy to agriculture to timber, all of which fall under government oversight, what agency is in charge of regulation and what regulations are enforced are of great importance to the companies’ bottom line.
Since Koch Industries deals in commodity trading, for example, they have a business interest in whether the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has the resources to ensure oil speculators play by the rules. And given its oil-and-gas interests, they have a business interest in whether the Environmental Protection Agency has the resources to crack down on polluters to ensure public health.
Source: “Koch Industries, Inc. - Locations,” available at http://www.kochind.com/locations.asp.
Last edited by Natural Citizen; 04-21-2014 at 11:35 PM.
So good or bad?
Neither good or bad. They seem to act in order to benefit their self interest. Some people don't like them because they are rich and donate to political causes. They aren't as strict in their support of a philosophy as many of us are and seem to support a more gradual progress towards liberty.
You can read Natural Citizen's posts about them. He has an agenda against GMOs so he wants to use force to make people label their products if they have or don't have GMOs. Maybe he has an axe to grind with fossil fuels too. I don't know. But I don't have philisophically a problem with either.
From a pro-liberty financial donations point-of-view, they are the 2 best people to ever walk the Earth.
Last edited by Keith and stuff; 04-22-2014 at 09:17 AM.
Lifetime member of more than 1 national gun organization and the New Hampshire Liberty Alliance. Part of Young Americans for Liberty and Campaign for Liberty. Free State Project participant and multi-year Free Talk Live AMPlifier.
Bad history...
The Kochtopus vs. Murray N. Rothbard
Unfortunately, the efforts of the Kochtopus against the Mises Institute have continued to the present. The current campaign for the presidency of Ron Paul has secured for libertarian ideas a greater public hearing than ever before. But owing to Paul's long association with Rothbard and Rockwell, his campaign had little appeal to Cato. High officials of Cato cooperated with James Kirchick's malicious smears against him in The New Republic. (After his losing Senate campaign to Phil Gramm, Paul had been employed by Koch as chairman of Citizens for a Sound Economy, but his contract was not renewed. Like Rothbard, Ron Paul is a man of principle and would not compromise on his advocacy of the gold standard and opposition to the Federal Reserve System. Charles Koch did not want this: such measures would hardly help him gain influence with the Republican Party, to which, if I am not mistaken, he and his brother are the largest private contributors.Further, Paul would have no part of Koch's efforts to have the CSE, beneath free market rhetoric, lobby to promote legislation beneficial to his business interests.) It should come as no surprise that Matt Welch, the new editor of Reason, has published a viciously negative piece against Rockwell and Paul. Koch is a large funder of the magazine, and, as Murray Rothbard learned to his cost, he expects those he funds to obey his dictates.
Rand Paul for Peace
Agreed. I'm a bit surprised by the way some are gushing over these guys. Yes, they donate heavily to Republican candidates - some of which trickles down to Liberty candidates. However, I'm not convinced by a long shot that the Koch Brothers are interested in Ron Paul type Liberty. In fact, I believe the LAST thing these guys would want is Liberty in the form that many here would like.
They want what all men of power want... more power and more influence. Sometimes that power and influence benefits so-called liberty candidates, other times it serves the almighty dollar.
I don't particularly care about the Koch brothers or their money. They do donate a ton of money to charities, hospitals, and the like... which is good. I just think there is too much hype about them. They have money and want/have a wide sphere of influence... who cares?
-Major General Smedley Butler, USMC,There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.
Two-Time Congressional Medal of Honor Winner
Author of, War is a Racket!
- Diogenes of SinopeIt is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours.
because they are not progressive billionaires like Warren Buffett and Bill Gates.
They may not be progressive, but being billionaires like Buffet, Gates, and Soros, they also want what every other billionaire wants: power and influence. Some things should never be for sale, no matter what one's political ideology is.
Because if you don't hate them your progressive friends won't think you're cool anymore.
QFT.
Lots of people are so stuck in the phony left/right paradigm.
“The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner
I think it's a "she," but check this out:
Apparently she has issues with libertarianism too. And let's not forget that she has proudly claimed that all her "news" comes from a communist propaganda station.I've said many times that libertariansim serves as the stalking horse for fascism
Did you know that one of them was the Libertarian Party's vice - presidential candidate once?
AND if you don't worship the ground they walk on, your "conservative" friends won't think you're cool anymore. There is no problem with them being rich. The problem comes when they use their money, power and influence to get the government to do their bidding. IF the were such liberty lovers, they would have donated more than 0 dollars to Ron Paul's presidential runs. Billionaire who claim they are liberty lovers and yet can't even max out $2,500 towards Ron Paul's campaigns.
And then they destroyed the LP and Cato by removing the philosophical principles from these groups.
Can you please explain this statement?
Thanks.
All modern revolutions have ended in a reinforcement of the power of the State.
-Albert Camus
Exactly this.
"One thing my years in Washington taught me is that most politicians are followers, not leaders. Therefore we should not waste time and resources trying to educate politicians. Politicians will not support individual liberty and limited government unless and until they are forced to do so by the people," says Ron Paul."
Posting Permissions
Connect With Us