Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 43

Thread: Reid Stands by Bundy Remarks: They’re ‘Domestic Violent Terrorist Wannabes’

  1. #1

    Reid Stands by Bundy Remarks: They’re ‘Domestic Violent Terrorist Wannabes’


    Senator Harry Reid came under fire for saying Thursday that supporters of Cliven Bundy are “domestic terrorists,” and in a TV appearance today he doubled down. He appeared on local Nevada program What’s Your Point? with Dean Heller, Nevada’s other senator, and stood by his remarks, calling Bundy’s supporters “domestic violent terrorist wannabes.”

    Reid said that Bundy “doesn’t believe that the American government is valid” and doesn’t follow the law, bringing up how hundreds of people showed up armed to defend Bundy to argue that they’re basically engaging in an act of domestic terrorism.

    “600 people came. Armed. They had practice, they had maneuver, they knew what they were doing. They set up snipers in strategic locations with sniper rifles. They had assault weapons. They had automatic weapons… If there ever were an example of people who were domestic violent terrorist wannabes, these are the guys, and I think we should call it that way.”

    Heller said, “What Senator Reid may call domestic terrorists, I call patriots.” Reid shot back, “If they’re patriots, we’re in real trouble.”
    more here.... http://www.mediaite.com/tv/reid-stan...rist-wannabes/
    “The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
    - Josef Stalin



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    I had to raise the volume to listen to this video because Reid's voice was too low and raspy from sucking on old man cock
    A savage barbaric tribal society where thugs parade the streets and illegally assault and murder innocent civilians, yeah that is the alternative to having police. Oh wait, that is the police

    We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home.
    - Edward R. Murrow

    ...I think we have moral obligations to disobey unjust laws, because non-cooperation with evil is as much as a moral obligation as cooperation with good. - MLK Jr.

    How to trigger a liberal: "I didn't get vaccinated."

  4. #3
    $#@! You Harry.

  5. #4
    Reid is the terrorist. He supports urban development and then shrewdly transfers the ecological and other fallout to rural dwellers in adjacent areas. The latest euphemism is "secondary mitigation." Reid and his minions, for example, expect rural dwellers to help create, renew, or replenish water sources that were taken in urban development.

    The rural dwellers object to this transfer of responsibility and Reid supports sending in his troops. They rough up women and pregnant women. That is the very epitome of terrorism.

  6. #5
    “If they’re patriots, we’re in real trouble.”
    ...Well at least he finally got one thing correct in his long pointless political career.

    Apropos, I feel that if Mr. Reid truly believes what he is peddling, with all this talk about domestic terrorism, then he should be brought up on inciting domestic terrorism charges. Rather than trying to tactfully reason the present issue, he is belittling, denigrating, or otherwise trivializing the very real concerns of the very people he considers to be so very dangerous. When standing beneath a towering tree one should take caution to not begin whacking hornet’s nests. A statesman Mr. Reid is certainly not.
    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding one’s self in the ranks of the insane.” — Marcus Aurelius

    They’re not buying it. CNN, you dumb bastards!” — President Trump 2020

    Consilio et Animis de Oppresso Liber

  7. #6
    Notice how when he calls the land "federal land", that he points his hands at himself, like he owns the **&**(( land. Dear God, I hate that POS.
    ================
    Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.

    Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America

    The Property Basis of Rights

  8. #7
    //
    Last edited by LibertyEagle; 04-19-2014 at 02:40 AM.
    ================
    Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.

    Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America

    The Property Basis of Rights

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by LibertyEagle View Post
    Notice how when he calls the land "federal land", that he points his hands at himself, like he owns the **&**(( land. Dear God, I hate that POS.
    I did not catch that. It really is very telling and pretty much says it all.

    If anybody can stomach watching, it's the last few seconds of the video.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    I have a difficult time getting behind a multimillionaire rancher (Cliven Bundy) who inherited a lot of his wealth, as well as getting wealth through Federal Subsidies not only through massive government agriculture programs, but grazing and water use of public lands, which in fact he stopped paying all together. So in fact he is like a welfare queen who is mad that they aren't getting enough free things, had his day in court and lost and now refuses to comply at the barrel of his gun to the legal order. That seems like the opposite of Libertarian principles to me ...

    In addition, he put all those men, women and children's safety at risk to protect his fortune, for his greed, who largely thought they were doing the right thing and standing up for a cause and freedom. Yes, the BLM agents showed up armed, but they are just enforcing the multiple court orders that we in a civilized society strive to live by (rules and laws). Bundy needs to take his issues to court if he thinks he has a real legal standing, essentially he is stealing with the literal barrel of his gun.

    If you really want to get behind Cliven Bundy, then you have to say the Federal Government doesn't exist, so we live in anarchy and is that really what people around here think? If you have ever voted for Ron Paul or a liberty candidate, then you have to admit to the system and you are trying to change it. This situation is just anarchy. Look what happened to Wesley Snipes when he went to jail over not paying his taxes, do the oath keepers and Cliven support him?
    http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11...n-tax-charges/
    We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false. -- William Casey, CIA Director

    Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.-- Mark Twain

    When people like us-- the scum of society-- don't risk our lives when a rare chance comes our way, we become losers at that moment. So courage is the only thing we can rely on.-- Anchan
    Rick Simpson Hemp Oil

  12. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by squarepusher View Post
    I have a difficult time getting behind a multimillionaire rancher (Cliven Bundy) who inherited a lot of his wealth,
    WTF is wrong with someone inheriting wealth? I have to tell you that when someone says something negative about someone inheriting money, that it smacks a lot of jealousy. By the way, that is how farming/ranching has been pretty much since it first started. Land and equipment are handed down and the next generation continues farming/ranching on that land. While many used to have a high net worth because of the land and equipment they owned, they actually lived pretty meagerly. The land and equipment were tools of their trade.
    ================
    Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.

    Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America

    The Property Basis of Rights

  13. #11
    LibForestPaul
    Member

    Wonder who put Harry in the Senate? Oh, wait for it, the peoples of Nevada. Reap what you sow bitches.

  14. #12
    Harry Reid has rewritten the book on low-class and tacky corruption.
    #NashvilleStrong

    “I’m a doctor. That’s a baby.”~~~Dr. Manny Sethi

  15. #13
    Square, how can you be a member of this site since 08 and have an opinion like that? You're mad because he inherited 14hr days? Because he inherited day after day of backbreaking work? It's not all sunshine and lolipops kid, Cliven works his ass of everyday maintaining that land and his herd and his ranch. THAT is why he and others are fighting back. Not to protect an inheritance. I am disappointed, for real.
    "The issue is that you to define the best candidate solely based upon what they stand for." - CaptLouAlbano

    This is the mindset trying to take hold on RPF.

    "Kelly Thomas did this to himself." - FrankRep

  16. #14
    “If they’re patriots, we’re in real trouble.”
    Yes,, they are.
    and yes,, you are.



    And there are a lot more of them than you know.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  17. #15
    Terrorists like to kill people and take hostages, am I right?

    ...and no one is after Mr. Reid? He sleeps peacefully in his bed at night beside his wife, does he not?

    Methinks he is using inflammatory statements in order to control the debate. We can say what we like here, we can discuss and debate; so long as the folks gathered around the Bundy ranch continue to barbecue and camp out without killing people or taking hostages, they are not terrorists.

    It's really a shame that so many Americans do not understand the rights the Constitution safeguards for them. If more people did, however, Reid wouldn't have time to make his inflammatory statements.

    Patriots really do like their rights, and that includes the right Reid has to say stupid $#@!. Patriots will not deprive a man of life or liberty without due process. No one is advocating violence, save Reid. I say that makes him the domestic terrorist.
    Last edited by NorfolkPCSolutions; 04-19-2014 at 10:10 AM.
    “The people of the various provinces are strictly forbidden to have in their possession any swords, bows, spears, firearms, or other type of arms. The possession of these elements makes difficult the collection of taxes and dues and tends to permit uprising, therefore, the heads of the provinces, official agents, and deputies are ordered to collect all weapons mentioned above and turn them over to the government.”

    Toyotomi Hideyshi, Shogun, August 29, 1558




  18. #16
    This is why I made my thread the other day.

    So Harry is lying here when he says it is Federal land? Why isn't anyone debating him calling him out on that if it is Nevada land? Why isn't anyone calling out that the BLM was formed AFTER Nevada already had rights to the land? They picked the worst guy to debate Reid on this by design.

    Hell lets take it a step further and say the Native Americans actually own the land before any of us got here.

    Those simple questions are not being injected into any debate I watch. If the above is true, it needs to be hammered over and over again.
    Last edited by muh_roads; 04-19-2014 at 10:25 AM.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by squarepusher View Post
    I have a difficult time getting behind a multimillionaire rancher (Cliven Bundy) who inherited a lot of his wealth, as well as getting wealth through Federal Subsidies not only through massive government agriculture programs, but grazing and water use of public lands, which in fact he stopped paying all together. So in fact he is like a welfare queen who is mad that they aren't getting enough free things, had his day in court and lost and now refuses to comply at the barrel of his gun to the legal order. That seems like the opposite of Libertarian principles to me ...

    In addition, he put all those men, women and children's safety at risk to protect his fortune, for his greed, who largely thought they were doing the right thing and standing up for a cause and freedom. Yes, the BLM agents showed up armed, but they are just enforcing the multiple court orders that we in a civilized society strive to live by (rules and laws). Bundy needs to take his issues to court if he thinks he has a real legal standing, essentially he is stealing with the literal barrel of his gun.

    If you really want to get behind Cliven Bundy, then you have to say the Federal Government doesn't exist, so we live in anarchy and is that really what people around here think? If you have ever voted for Ron Paul or a liberty candidate, then you have to admit to the system and you are trying to change it. This situation is just anarchy. Look what happened to Wesley Snipes when he went to jail over not paying his taxes, do the oath keepers and Cliven support him?
    http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11...n-tax-charges/
    "IF GOD DIDN'T WANT TO HELP AMERICA, THEN WE WOULD HAVE Hillary Clinton"!!
    "let them search you,touch you,violate your Rights,just don't be a dick!"~ cdc482
    "For Wales. Why Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world. But for Wales?"
    All my life I've been at the mercy of men just following orders... Never again!~Erik Lehnsherr
    There's nothing wrong with stopping people randomly, especially near bars, restaurants etc.~Velho

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Paladin69 View Post
    This is why I made my thread the other day.

    So Harry is lying here when he says it is Federal land? Why isn't anyone debating him calling him out on that if it is Nevada land? Why isn't anyone calling out that the BLM was formed AFTER Nevada already had rights to the land? They picked the worst guy to debate Reid on this by design.
    Harry Reid is a collectivist authoritarian here. He isn't so much as lying as he is advocating fascist policy. He is dead set that the Federal Government owns the land. They. do. not. Period. But even with all of the evidence he does not care. None of them do. They'll shoot down those who cannot otherwise be imprisoned or fined into compliance. Compliance of their non-law and bureaucratically enacted decrees, that is.

    Everyone is calling him out on it. How does the Federal Government own 90% of Nevada? How does it own 48% of Arizona? They don't. They don't own any land absent military bases and Washington DC and even then, the ownership is not that of the government. It is of the people's. It's my goddamn Fort, after-all am I not robbed weekly to pay for it? This while the ticks of DC develop intricate means to avoid taxes while simultaneously digging my pockets for every cent they can discover?

    Why isn't anyone calling out that 264,000,000 acres of the most valuable land has been squandered by an unconstitutional bureaucracy? Why don't they speak of the corrupt deals in which the Federal bureaucrats were lobbied by barons to have their worthless property dictated part of an ever growing National Park? The Fifth Amendment requires them to be compensated, after all. Well they were purposely given land with value far exceeding the property that was confiscated from them. This is aside from their schemes of acquiring thousands of acres, building their property, having the surrounding area labeled Federal Land and prohibiting anyone else from building or living there.

    Oh wait, they have.

    Hell lets take it a step further and say the Native Americans actually own the land before any of us got here.
    They did. What, because the establishment of our government, we had some right to murder or dispel those already here? What happened to the American Indians was a shame. I'm not quite sure what you are getting at. (hopefully not anything along the lines of what squarepusher was getting at)

    Those simple questions are not being injected into any debate I watch. If the above is true, it needs to be hammered over and over again.
    What right does the Federal Government have to control 90% of Nevada's land? It isn't a matter of "if." I don't care how many people in this country think otherwise.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump

  22. #19
    That's so upside down I don't even know where to start.

    ETA -

    "There have been a lot of people criticizing Clive Bundy because he did not pay his grazing fees for 20 years. The public is also probably wondering why so many other cowboys are supporting Mr. Bundy even though they paid their fees and Clive did not. What you people probably do not realize is that on every rancher's grazing permit it says the following: "You are authorized to make grazing use of the lands, under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management and covered by this grazing permit, upon your acceptance of the terms and conditions of this grazing permit and payment of grazing fees when due." The "mandatory" terms and conditions go on to list the allotment, the number and kind of livestock to be grazed, when the permit begins and ends, the number of active or suspended AUMs (animal units per month), etc. The terms and conditions also list specific requirements such as where salt or mineral supplements can be located, maximum allowable use of forage levels (40% of annual growth), etc., and include a lot more stringent policies that must be adhered to. Every rancher must sign this "contract" agreeing to abide by the TERMS AND CONDITIONS before he or she can make payment. In the early 90s, the BLM went on a frenzy and drastically cut almost every rancher's permit because of this desert tortoise issue, even though all of us ranchers knew that cow and desert tortoise had co-existed for a hundred+ years. As an example, a family friend had his permit cut by 90%. For those of you who are non ranchers, that would be equated to getting your paycheck cut 90%. In 1976 there were approximately 52 ranching permittees in this area of Nevada. Presently, there are 3. Most of these people lost their livelihoods because of the actions of the BLM. Clive Bundy was one of these people who received extremely unfair and unreasonable TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    Keep in mind that Mr. Bundy was required to sign this contract before he was allowed to pay. Had Clive signed on the dotted line, he would have, in essence, signed his very livelihood away. And so Mr. Bundy took a stand, not only for himself, but for all of us. He refused to be destroyed by a tyrannical federal entity and to have his American liberties and freedoms taken away. Also keep in mind that all ranchers financially paid dearly for the forage rights those permits allow - - not rights to the land, but rights to use the forage that grows on that land. Many of these AUMS are water based, meaning that the rancher also has a vested right (state owned, not federal) to the waters that adjoin the lands and allow the livestock to drink. These water rights were also purchased at a great price. If a rancher cannot show beneficial use of the water (he must have the appropriate number of livestock that drinks and uses that water), then he loses that water right. Usually water rights and forage rights go hand in hand. Contrary to what the BLM is telling you, they NEVER compensate a rancher for the AUMs they take away. Most times, they tell ranchers that their AUMS are "suspended," but not removed. Unfortunately, my family has thousands of "suspended" AUMs that will probably never be returned. And so, even though these ranchers throughout the course of a hundred years invested thousands(and perhaps millions) of dollars and sacrificed along the way to obtain these rights through purchase from others, at a whim the government can take everything away with the stroke of a pen. This is the very thing that Clive Bundy single handedly took a stand against. Thank you, Clive, from a rancher who considers you a hero."
    Quote Originally Posted by squarepusher View Post
    I have a difficult time getting behind a multimillionaire rancher (Cliven Bundy) who inherited a lot of his wealth, as well as getting wealth through Federal Subsidies not only through massive government agriculture programs, but grazing and water use of public lands, which in fact he stopped paying all together. So in fact he is like a welfare queen who is mad that they aren't getting enough free things, had his day in court and lost and now refuses to comply at the barrel of his gun to the legal order. That seems like the opposite of Libertarian principles to me ...

    In addition, he put all those men, women and children's safety at risk to protect his fortune, for his greed, who largely thought they were doing the right thing and standing up for a cause and freedom. Yes, the BLM agents showed up armed, but they are just enforcing the multiple court orders that we in a civilized society strive to live by (rules and laws). Bundy needs to take his issues to court if he thinks he has a real legal standing, essentially he is stealing with the literal barrel of his gun.

    If you really want to get behind Cliven Bundy, then you have to say the Federal Government doesn't exist, so we live in anarchy and is that really what people around here think? If you have ever voted for Ron Paul or a liberty candidate, then you have to admit to the system and you are trying to change it. This situation is just anarchy. Look what happened to Wesley Snipes when he went to jail over not paying his taxes, do the oath keepers and Cliven support him?
    http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11...n-tax-charges/
    Last edited by Anti Federalist; 04-19-2014 at 05:35 PM.

  23. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by squarepusher View Post
    In addition, he put all those men, women and children's safety at risk to protect his fortune, for his greed, who largely thought they were doing the right thing and standing up for a cause and freedom. Yes, the BLM agents showed up armed, but they are just enforcing the multiple court orders that we in a civilized society strive to live by (rules and laws). Bundy needs to take his issues to court if he thinks he has a real legal standing, essentially he is stealing with the literal barrel of his gun.
    King's Land, King's Grant, King's Court...c'mon, you're just trolling now.

    So, who is the "perfect" victim of government oppression that "we" should coalesce around?

  24. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    King's Land, King's Grant, King's Court...c'mon, you're just trolling now.

    So, who is the "perfect" victim of government oppression that "we" should coalesce around?
    Wesley Snipes.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump

  25. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by kcchiefs6465 View Post
    Wesley Snipes.
    Let's wait and see how he does in the Expendables 3.
    "IF GOD DIDN'T WANT TO HELP AMERICA, THEN WE WOULD HAVE Hillary Clinton"!!
    "let them search you,touch you,violate your Rights,just don't be a dick!"~ cdc482
    "For Wales. Why Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world. But for Wales?"
    All my life I've been at the mercy of men just following orders... Never again!~Erik Lehnsherr
    There's nothing wrong with stopping people randomly, especially near bars, restaurants etc.~Velho

  26. #23
    Account Restricted. Admin to review account standing


    Posts
    28,739
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Quote Originally Posted by kcchiefs6465 View Post
    Wesley Snipes.
    I don't think he even asked for help. Hell, he's never even said anything publicly or joined an anti-tax organization. It's hard to help people who won't help themselves.

  27. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    I don't think he even asked for help. Hell, he's never even said anything publicly or joined an anti-tax organization. It's hard to help people who won't help themselves.
    Wesley Snipes Freed--Tax Lessons Remain

    Wesley Snipes is out of prison. TMZ broke the story that the Federal Bureau of Prisons quietly released him April 2. He’s not in the wind, though, but was transferred to the New York Community Corrections Office for home confinement until July 19th. Death and Taxes has photos of the halfway house. See Wesley Snipes released from prison, under house arrest.

    What a ride it’s been, starting in 2006. Mr. Snipes was convicted of three misdemeanor counts of failing to file tax returns in 2008. Sentenced to McKean Federal Correctional Institution, a medium-security prison in Pennsylvania, he reported December 9, 2010. He finished at the adjacent prison camp, a minimum security Club Fed as inmate number 43355-018.

    During 1999 through 2001, Snipes avoided $7 million in taxes but I’ll bet he would have paid it willingly had he known what was coming. Whatever you may think of Mr. Snipes, it seems clear he was led astray. Snipes followed an accountant and an anti-tax advocate down a dangerous path, but it was still his responsibility.

    The advisers claimed they did not legally have to pay taxes. One of Snipes’ original defenses was that he was relying on Eddie Ray Kahn and Douglas P. Rosile. They were convicted by the same jury of tax fraud and conspiracy and both got longer prison terms than Mr. Snipes. Still, Snipes must have been surprised by the trial, which was shorter than anticipated.

    Snipes was such a well-known figure and high earner—about $40 million from 1999 to 2004—that not paying taxes was hard to fathom. The big victory for Snipes was that he was acquitted of felony tax fraud and conspiracy and only convicted of misdemeanor charges. See Wesley Snipes Turns 50 In Prison But Didn’t File False Tax Return. But that meant up to 3 years, which he got.

    Snipes appealed, argued his sentence was unreasonable, and even claimed he couldn’t get a fair trial in Ocala, Florida because of his race. Even the U.S. Supreme Court turned him down. Post prison, I imagine Mr. Snipes might dispense the following advice, though these are my assumptions, not his words:

    Don’t Argue Our Tax System is Voluntary. This is self-explanatory. Forget it.

    Don’t Use Off-beat Definitions of Income. Don’t argue wages, tips, and other compensation received for personal services are not income. Avoid saying Federal Reserve Notes are not income or that only foreign-source income is taxable, making domestic income exempt. This has variations, but this is what ensnared Mr. Snipes.

    Don’t Argue Over Terms in the Tax Code. Avoid arguing that a taxpayer is not a “citizen” of the U.S. and thus not subject to tax laws. Avoid claiming the U.S. consists only of the District of Columbia, federal territories, and federal enclaves. Don’t argue that only employees of the federal government are subject to federal income tax.

    Steer Clear of Constitutional Claims. Arguments based on the First, Fifth, Thirteenth and Sixteenth Amendments to our Constitution include such “nice try” claims as: Taxpayers can refuse to pay income taxes on religious or moral grounds by invoking the First Amendment; Federal income taxes constitute a “taking” without due process; and compelled compliance with federal income tax laws is servitude violating the Thirteenth Amendment.

    Don’t Assert Fictional Legal Theories. Avoid these “fictional” claims: The IRS is not an agency of the U.S. (You lose.) Taxpayers are not required to file a federal income tax return because the instructions to Form 1040 and tax regulations don’t display an OMB control number as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. (No again.) Don’t claim you’re a church. Don’t buy “untaxing” trusts or other deals that sound like infomercials.

    Be Careful Relying on Others. This may be the most important lesson of all. If something sounds too good to be true, it may be. Stay free, Wesley.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwo...essons-remain/
    [....]

    Snipes had been paying millions in federal income taxes when, according to prosecutors, he accepted the arguments of his two co-defendants, an accountant and an anti-tax ideologue. In lengthy filings to the IRS, the three defendants claimed they did not legally have to pay taxes, citing an obscure section of the tax code that establishes that foreign sources of income for U.S. citizens are taxable.

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/p...asion/2057455/
    Wesley Snipes would have taken all of the help he could have gotten. Generally speaking, your speech is restricted during the trial process. He couldn't come out and say what he may have wanted to for fear that the maximum sentence would have been handed to him. And as well, it is clear he doesn't much care for being robbed.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by LibForestPaul View Post
    Wonder who put Harry in the Senate? Oh, wait for it, the peoples of Nevada. Reap what you sow bitches.
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bl.../2620865/posts

  30. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by LibForestPaul View Post
    Wonder who put Harry in the Senate? Oh, wait for it, the peoples of Nevada. Reap what you sow bitches.
    Goddammit are you going to blame me for Mac Thornberry or John Cornyn if and when I get steamrolled over? I didn't vote for him. Do you think Cliven Bundy voted for Reid?

  31. #27
    Maybe Reid should stand by the militia when he says that.
    #NashvilleStrong

    “I’m a doctor. That’s a baby.”~~~Dr. Manny Sethi

  32. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by squarepusher View Post
    I have a difficult time getting behind a multimillionaire rancher (Cliven Bundy) who inherited a lot of his wealth, as well as getting wealth through Federal Subsidies not only through massive government agriculture programs, but grazing and water use of public lands, which in fact he stopped paying all together. So in fact he is like a welfare queen who is mad that they aren't getting enough free things, had his day in court and lost and now refuses to comply at the barrel of his gun to the legal order. That seems like the opposite of Libertarian principles to me ...
    I challenge you to refuse your heirs their inheritance in your will. I challenge you to make a living as a rancher without being a "multimillionaire". And if you live in a city, I challenge you to stop using the subsidy that your local government provides to steal water from other people and their lands. As usual, most "principled" libertarians are just as hypocritical as the people they criticize.

  33. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by fr33 View Post
    Goddammit are you going to blame me for Mac Thornberry or John Cornyn if and when I get steamrolled over? I didn't vote for him. Do you think Cliven Bundy voted for Reid?
    Thank you!

  34. #30
    according to reid i am a terrorist to. well, i have been ever since the patriot act i suppose.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 123
    Last Post: 04-22-2014, 08:19 AM
  2. 96% of MSNBC viewers believe Bundy is a domestic terrorist.
    By RPfan1992 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 04-19-2014, 08:35 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-18-2014, 01:12 PM
  4. Sen. Reid calls supporters of Nevada rancher Bundy 'domestic terrorists'
    By Right Wing in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-18-2014, 08:18 AM
  5. DHS to treat farmers like terrorist wannabes
    By XNavyNuke in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-10-2008, 11:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •